Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MineralMan; neverdem
IIRC, Picasso started the abstract ball rolling with cubism and Pollack followed shortly with abstract expressionism. Either way I think they are both great examples of art that defies word and explanation.

I love abstract painting and modern art in general (specific pieces, of course, not all), but I can't for the life of me explain why (even to myself).

Les Demoiselles d'Avignon, 1907.


7 posted on 10/30/2005 10:34:36 AM PST by Dark Skies ("A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants." -- Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Dark Skies

I enjoy the moderns, too, both the semi-representational stuff like Picasso's and the non-representational art of Pollack and others.

I suspect that the original poster does not share that appreciation. Thank goodness there's room for varied tastes in art.


8 posted on 10/30/2005 10:38:18 AM PST by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: Dark Skies
IIRC, Picasso started the abstract ball rolling with cubism and Pollack followed shortly with abstract expressionism.

IIRC, my art teacher, for a core requirement course I needed to take in college, would say Paul Cezanne got that ball rolling.

The Bay

11 posted on 10/30/2005 11:04:18 AM PST by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson