[Marano NYC]

I have a sense you are correct.

However, my nephew who is a liberal dragged me into the farce of a film.

The cycle of violence is an old argument and you break the cycle by winning .

Law enforcement is not an option as offered by the film. The Europeans protected terrorists as long as the violence was restricted to the Middle East.

The KGB did protect terrorists as portrayed in the film. The role of the KGB in training terrorists was not explored at all.

European leftist terrorists did work with Islamic terrorists. Rarely mentioned was so did Hollywood's beloved Sandanistas.

Munich was a bad film with a stupid premise . The part about non politicals selling information was bunk. Leftists sell each other out for a price .

[demkicker]

All great points, thanks.

Spielberg: "But it does not excuse the act when you ask what the motives of the perpetrators were and show that they were also individuals with families and a history.... Understanding does not mean forgiving. Understanding does not mean being soft, it is a courageous and strong stance."

Spielberg reminds me of that gopher game where they pop up only to get clubbed. WHY would anyone but a leftist idiot care about a terrorist, his family and their history????? Who but a left winged moonbat would want to "examine" them?

Spielberg better start using some sandpaper on that thin skin of his. What's good for the goose is good for the gander. He's the one wanting us to examine and understand the terrorists and their families. So it should not surprise him that the public has every right to examine HIM and his MOTIVES. I have a sneaky feeling that before it's all said and done, Mr. Spielberg will regret having made Munich.