Replies

"Fat, toxic toads---evolved longer legs than those behind the front lines, report biologists. The alarming discovery---raises the possibility that under the right conditions, animal evolution can happen in just decades, not eons."

The Darwinists just never stop with the nonsense do they? We've already been taken down this primrose path by Darwin himself. He observed that the beaks of the Galapagos Island finches grew in the area of tenths of a milimeter as a result of draught. This, he claimed, was proof of 'natural selection' and 'evolution'. It was ballyhood around Darwinist circles as great evidence of 'evolution' for a century. Trouble for Darwinists is, that it has been discovered that the beaks return to normal size as soon as the drought is over, meaning it is merely a built-in adaption process, not 'evolution'.

Then there was the peppered moth 'evolution' evidence. The 'scientists' showed photos of moths that had seemingly changed colors to adapt to the environmental pollution caused by the industrial revolution, (soot, etc). The Darwinists declared the moths rapidly changed colors to avoid being seen and eaten, (hence 'natural selection'). Problem this time for the Darwinists was that the moths were faked, and they were glued to the trees by 'scientists'.

Then of course there was the earlier nonsense about the human fetus having "fish gills" and a "tailbone", which turned out to be the ear canal and the spine, (which developed before the legs did).

Need I mention the facts about Piltdown Man,

or "Archaeoraptor", (named "Piltdown Bird' because a donosaur's tail was glued to the bird)?

Need I mention the facts about Piltdown Man,

Oh, OK. I guess that means that evolution is false.

[Need I mention the facts about the evangelist Jim Jones]

Oh, OK. I guess that means that faith in God is false.

"Archaeoraptor", (named "Piltdown Bird' because a donosaur's tail was glued to the bird)?

Oh, OK. I guess that means the evolution is false.

[Marjoe, the fake evangelist named after "Mary and Joseph" and wrote the tell all book about the revival preaching "business".]

Oh, OK. I guess that means that faith in God is false.

We could continue this for awhile.

"He observed that the beaks of the Galapagos Island finches grew in the area of tenths of a milimeter as a result of draught. This, he claimed, was proof of 'natural selection' and 'evolution'."

No, he said it was evidence, not proof.

"The 'scientists' showed photos of moths that had seemingly changed colors to adapt to the environmental pollution caused by the industrial revolution, (soot, etc)."

No, they didn;t say this. They said that there were two different color variations, a light and a dark colored moth. The dark colored variety increased in numbers when the bark was darker, and light variety increased in number when it was lighter. This is a demonstration of natural selection.

"The Darwinists declared the moths rapidly changed colors to avoid being seen and eaten, (hence 'natural selection')."

You are completely misinformed. They said no such thing.

" Problem this time for the Darwinists was that the moths were faked, and they were glued to the trees by 'scientists'."

No, the studies were real. In one photo, two moths were shown together, a dark one and a light colored one. They were glued to the tree to get a good picture, as the only point in this particular photo was to show the two color strains. The rest of the photos were of single moths that were not glued to the trees and were found in the wild as they were. Please, read up a little before you say such foolish things.

"Then of course there was the earlier nonsense about the human fetus having "fish gills" and a "tailbone", which turned out to be the ear canal and the spine, (which developed before the legs did)."

Early human embryos DO have features that in fish turn into gills. And we DO have a tail-bone.

" Need I mention the facts about Piltdown Man,"

True, since it was a hoax uncovered by evolutionists.

" or "Archaeoraptor", (named "Piltdown Bird' because a donosaur's tail was glued to the bird)?"

This was NEVER accepted by science and was faked not by scientists but by fossil sellers in China.

He observed that the beaks of the Galapagos Island finches grew in the area of tenths of a milimeter as a result of draught.

Then they should have drunk bottled beer. Sheesh!

Trouble for Darwinists is, that it has been discovered that the beaks return to normal size as soon as the drought is over, meaning it is merely a built-in adaption process, not 'evolution'.

Spoken like a man who hasn't figured out Icons of Evolution is properly shelved under 'fiction'.

Anyone who wants to see this and the rest of the Crudaer's idiocy rebutted, read this

(Also, it reveals that Crusader's 'knowledge' of this area comes from reading one completely discredited book, written by a Moonie cultist.)

Need I mention the facts about Piltdown Man

Science has built-in mechanisms to flesh out and expose frauds.

Howzabout Religion? Name one rigorous mechanism that religion has to expose frauds.

I mean just look at the LDS -- started by a fraud and now one of the largest churches around. Scientology, ditto.

The Kettle in the Glass House.

This is how the acceptance of Darwin as actual science has dumbed down the masses: unfortunately, kids and adults read this garbage and actually believe it supports evolution. I bet if someone would challenge this in the courts, those brilliant justices would support the author and call it legitimate science.
Oh, and I guess if our kids are'nt taught this junk, they could never be "real scientists'

At first I thought this was from The Onion!