Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Last week Brit Hume looked right into the camera and lied to us about Bush's poll numbers. On one night, he reported with a mocking tone that See-BS had over loaded its poll by 12 points of Democrats and therefore produced a suspect document reporting a very low approval number for Bush.

The very next night, Hume looked right at us and reported that the Fox poll had Bush at about the same low number and just skipped telling us that the Fox poll over polled Democrats by 10 points. He probably thinks that there is a big difference between overpolling Democrats by 12 points or 10 points. I don't.

What has happened to Fox? They are atarting to take us for granted. I now watch on Hume's show. H&C is a joke.

1 posted on 03/10/2006 9:54:10 AM PST by jmaroneps37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: jmaroneps37

Who is Chris Wallace?


2 posted on 03/10/2006 10:00:55 AM PST by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

There is hope.. Tony Snow has been hinting at 'some things to come' at FOX for him a new show.

Now he is relegated to his saturday morning show, but I'd LOVE to see him in a weeknight position, or a chunk of time sunday afternoon.


3 posted on 03/10/2006 10:02:17 AM PST by FreedomNeocon (I'm in no Al-Samood for this Shi'ite.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

They did their best to suppress the Swift Boat Veterans. I think election drama is good for the talking head business.


4 posted on 03/10/2006 10:02:22 AM PST by Wristpin ("The Yankees announce plan to buy every player in Baseball....")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

This over sampling issue is a real puzzle. The problem is that pollsters can not construct their sample base on party registration. It is self reported.

Thus in a period when the current president's numbers are down, more people will claim to be of the opposite party meaning the sample should not match the sample at the last election. On the other hand the old media is corrupt and we can not trust them to commission an honest poll. Thus, my view is we can never know what Bush's actual popularity is now.


7 posted on 03/10/2006 10:06:41 AM PST by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37
Is Chris Wallace stupid or lazy?

The two are not mutually exclusive. It's quite possible that he is both stupid and lazy.

8 posted on 03/10/2006 10:09:50 AM PST by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

I know Brit Hume and Chris Wallace you're no Brit Hume.

He belongs at CBS not FNC!


9 posted on 03/10/2006 10:10:21 AM PST by McGruff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

I like Chris Wallace and I really like Brit Hume. Neither is stupid. Take it easy! Jeez!!


11 posted on 03/10/2006 10:11:25 AM PST by loreldan (Lincoln, Reagan, & G. W. Bush - the cure for Democrat lunacy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

Brit Hume doesn't lie. He's the best in the business. I saw that clip and the #'s were not "at about the same low number". The poll he discussed, had the #'s at least 8-12 points higher. You are the one lying.


12 posted on 03/10/2006 10:13:41 AM PST by petercooper (Cemeteries & the ignorant - comprising 2 of the largest Democrat voting blocs for the past 75 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

Here is my "generic" take on most talking heads: they exhibit below average intelligence...that's why they are called talking heads. They read other people's writing, they report on other people's doings, and they maintain their jobs at the behest of other people.

Some exhibit a certain glibness and fluency with words but then so do totally illiterate people from stone age societies in New Guinea.


13 posted on 03/10/2006 10:19:37 AM PST by eleni121 ('Thou hast conquered, O Galilean!' (Julian the Apostate))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

39%

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,144315,00.html



FOX News/Opinion Dynamics Poll Methodology


Weighting

Generally, Fox News poll results are not weighted. The national probability sample, if conducted properly, should accurately reflect national attitudes. However, particularly because the survey is often conducted over only two nights (limiting the opportunity for callbacks), some demographic deviation is possible. Opinion Dynamics Corporation has a constantly updated database of demographic information about the national samples and, if one should deviate significantly from past averages, weighting is used to bring the sample into conformity with other samples.


http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,95854,00.html


15 posted on 03/10/2006 11:28:06 AM PST by petercooper (Cemeteries & the ignorant - comprising 2 of the largest Democrat voting blocs for the past 75 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: jmaroneps37

His voice just grates on me and I get overly excited when his guests ramble and on. Nothing about his style appeals to me. The only reason why I watch is because my husband loves to make fun of Juan Williams. 8-)


16 posted on 03/10/2006 1:16:10 PM PST by kcbc2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson