Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 03/22/2006 12:29:04 PM PST by John Galt's cousin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: John Galt's cousin

I know it has to do with a speech that Lawrence Summers gave..he was President of Harvard, I think...

I am SURE a freeper will help more than me, though, sorry.


2 posted on 03/22/2006 12:31:41 PM PST by Txsleuth (Bush-Bot;WaterBucket Brigader;and fan of defconw;Cboldt is my mentor!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Galt's cousin

Rush Limbaugh often talks about this.


3 posted on 03/22/2006 12:33:02 PM PST by DTogo (I haven't left the GOP, the GOP left me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Galt's cousin

http://www.statcan.ca/Daily/English/991220/d991220a.htm


4 posted on 03/22/2006 12:33:13 PM PST by mnehring (http://abaraxas.blogspot.com/.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Galt's cousin

Sorry dude. All the research is done by feminist researchers that don't care if that's the case or not.


5 posted on 03/22/2006 12:35:51 PM PST by Rockitz (Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Galt's cousin

Try here:

http://www.google.com/search?q=women+pay+experience&sourceid=opera&num=75&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8

I'm going to have plastic surgery done so I'll stop looking so much like a search engine.


6 posted on 03/22/2006 12:36:25 PM PST by KarinG1 (Some of us are trying to engage in philosophical discourse. Please don't allow us to interrupt you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Galt's cousin

Bookmarking, as lurker son is preparing term paper on this exact subject.


7 posted on 03/22/2006 12:39:44 PM PST by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Galt's cousin

Look here.....

http://www.iwf.org/issues/issues_list.asp?sType=73


8 posted on 03/22/2006 12:43:00 PM PST by goodnesswins ( "the left can only take power through deception." (and it seems Hillary & Company are the masters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Galt's cousin
A better discussion is in Walter Block's paper, "Discrimination: An Interdisciplinary Analysis" (available in PDF). His essential argument is that the inequality disappears if you correct for married women leaving the workforce, entering late, etc.
9 posted on 03/22/2006 12:45:06 PM PST by Shalom Israel (Actually, it's all done with mirrors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Galt's cousin
Mrs. Schlafly may be of some help.
try one of these Eagle Forum searches.

...and your friend might also avail herself of Phyllis Schlafly's books.

10 posted on 03/22/2006 12:48:33 PM PST by jla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Galt's cousin

Try "Why Men Earn More: The Startling Truth Behind the Pay Gap And What Women Can Do About It" by Warren Farrell.

In it, Farrell compares the starting salaries for women and men with Bachelor’s Degrees in 26 categories of employment, from investment banker to dietician. Women are paid equally in one category; in every other category, their starting salaries exceed men’s. A female investment banker’s starting salary is 116 percent of a man’s. A female dietician’s is 130 percent; that is, $23,160 compared to $17,680.

Next, Farrell analyzes the data that does reflect a wage gap. But rather than seeing oppression in the data, he perceives free choice. He argues: women commonly prefer jobs with shorter and more flexible hours to accommodate the demands of family. Compared to men, they generally favor jobs that involve little danger, no travel and good social skills. Such jobs generally pay less.

According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, full-time men clock an average of 45 hours a week, while women put in 42 hours. Men are more than twice as likely as women to work at least 50 hours a week.

Women’s lifestyle choices partly explain their absence from certain professions, especially dangerous ones. Men represent 92 percent of all occupational deaths. Why? Because if you look at a list of the most hazardous occupations -- fire fighting, truck driving, construction, and mining -- they have 96-98 percent male employees, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

I started looking into this information because, as a female engineer, I didn't see any difference in the pay between my male and female coworkers - except for those that chose to take time off from work for children, chose not to accept jobs that required travel, chose not to pursue higher degrees... It was all a matter of choice, so their whining about how unfair it all was really made me angry (among both men and women)!


13 posted on 03/22/2006 12:52:37 PM PST by Serenissima Venezia (U.S. a 3rd world soon: not educating enough scientists/engineers and being invaded by illegals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Galt's cousin
The reality is IF women were actually paid less (75% of what a man makes is around the typically figure thrown out) simply for being a "women".....what those of this mindset are suggesting economically is....that businesses could cut their labor costs by almost a third!! simply by hiring women.

If this were evenly remotely true....there wouldn't be an employed man...nor an unemployed women in America.

The reality is there is a whole range of tangible reasons why people are paid more or less. Simply being a "women" isn't one of them.

17 posted on 03/22/2006 12:58:09 PM PST by SevenMinusOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John Galt's cousin
I have a male friend who's a stay at home dad because his wife makes a lot more money than he did.

Your pay depends on your position, the field you get into, whether or not you are a contractor or a full employee of a company. Also, I've worked in companies where raises were automatic and I've worked for companies where they aren't. It's not just whether you are female. Sometimes women don't ask for what they really want (sound familiar guys!) and then they get mad because they coulda, shoulda, woulda asked, but didn't. And then they complain that the raise they got was crappy too!
19 posted on 03/22/2006 1:37:22 PM PST by kcbc2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson