Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Are we in a Gold Bubble
19 April 2006 | Jim Verdolini

Posted on 04/19/2006 11:08:46 AM PDT by Jim Verdolini

Are we in a Bullion Bubble? Gold and silver are rocketing to new highs. Look at the trend:

Monday Gold was over $604 and silver $13.33. By the end of the day Gold was $618. Tuesday it was Gold $620 and Silver $13.55. This Morning Gold $624.90 and Silver $14.16. Right now Gold is $632.70 and Silver $14.54!

I have read that there are two major things, in addition to oil prices, causing the rise. For Gold it has to do with a rumor that China plans to convert a small bit of their dollar reserves to Gold. For silver, there is a rumor that the metal will be traded differently and more vigorously. If China was to convert only 3% of their dollar reserves to gold, that would be the entire worlds production for a year!

I bought my wife a small gold crucifix last month. The chain supporting it was so frail that it broke in less than 2 weeks. I replaced it with a more serious chain and the store gave me a $20 credit on the flimsy old chain that weighs about nothing.


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: bahog; chatroom; gold; nolink
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-109 next last
To: Toddsterpatriot
And another thing....

The "$850 gold" episode is immutably linked the the "$50 silver" episode which creamed the Hunt Bros. In that episode, the Hunts were leveraged to the hilt (big mistake) and the COMEX changed the margin requirements...which, by the way, the COMEX just did on silver a few days ago. The change in margin req'mnets by the COMEX forced the Hunts to liquidate large amounts of silver and a price waterfall ensued. All I am really pointing out is that these things that happened "long ago" are very hazy in peoples' memories and there's a lot of shall we say "folk tales" surrounding them.

I've been pounding the table on silver since sub-$6 and it's rare I don't get a "Hunt Bros" comment. But really, it's fundamentally based. Silver can NOT be pulled out of the ground, environmentally permitted, refined, molded into ingots, checked into COMEX warehouses, etc etc for $6. Can't be done. $6 is flat out intrisically less money than it costs to get the stupid stuff to where someone can see it and hold it...or use it...or hoard it. I mean, that's 2 stinking lattes, or whatever. Same story w/$260 gold. It would be as if I was selling a house that could be rented for 2x the (fully amortized, not fantasy) mortgage payment or would cost 2x to re-create. It is a fundamental pricing imbalance awaiting only an awakening market to extinguish and correct. Now....can all that stuff be done (wrt pulling Ag/Au out of the ground) at Ag = $14.6 and Au = $640. I don't know. I don't think it's grossly, horribly overpriced.

NOW, however, there is clearly an entirely new mechanism taking over the precious metals markets, and it appears to be adding to whatever has driven the prices up to their already high points. It has elements of being a frenzy, for sure. But geez, how much money has been created in the poast few years in real estate...? Nobody complained when their houses tripled in value.

I have a good summary of the Hunt story, but I don't have a link, only a three page piece of blather...which is nevertheless worth reading. I will try to fetch the link & post here.

61 posted on 04/19/2006 1:39:55 PM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (Funny taglines are value plays.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Attention Surplus Disorder

I have a good friend who's father bought 10,000 oz of silver at around $18 during the Hunt fiasco. His mistake was in not selling when he mad a killing. Instead he rode out the crash..he ended up with 10,000 oz of silver in his basement for decades. All gone now.


62 posted on 04/19/2006 1:45:53 PM PDT by Jim Verdolini (We had it all, but the RINOs stalked the land and everything they touched was as dung and ashes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Jim Verdolini

Hunt story link: Longish, but pretty much worth reading.

http://www.buyandhold.com/bh/en/education/history/2000/hunt_bros.html


63 posted on 04/19/2006 1:47:18 PM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (Funny taglines are value plays.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Jim Verdolini

That was a lot of dough back then; and there are plenty of similar stories from that era. I was not active in the market at that time.

Very very very few folks were able to unload their silver anything near $50. The buyers were simply overwhelmed and stopped buying. One of the reasons why PM fans like myself think there is far less downside in the POG/POS is that the buying appears to be secular, broadbased, worldwide, etc etc, vs generated by one weirdo and all the folks who wanted to try to ride on that one weirdos' coattails.


64 posted on 04/19/2006 1:50:20 PM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (Funny taglines are value plays.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: simon says what
Other than 1981, what other times are you referring to Gold being in a bubble in the past ?

From the end of February, 1975 through September, 1975, gold fell from about $185 to about $129 -- a loss of about 30% -- and by September, 1976, the price bottomed out at about $104 -- a loss of almost 45% off the 1975 high.

In February, 1983, gold topped out at about $510, but seven months later, gold was in the $365 range for a loss of nearly 29%, and by February, 1985, gold was down to about $285 for a total loss during that period of about 44%.

From 1833 until 1971, the price of gold grew 97.6% or a mere .71% a year, and while not a bubble, gold failed miserbly to keep pace with inflation or equity investments.

Would you like me to keep going?

65 posted on 04/19/2006 1:56:02 PM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
Time in a gold thread before mention of fiat money (ooooooh!): 2 minutes 37 seconds.

“The legal tender quality [of money] is only valuable for the purposes of dishonesty.”

- Salmon Chase, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, former Secretary of the Treasury

66 posted on 04/19/2006 2:47:44 PM PDT by AdamSelene235 (Truth has become so rare and precious she is always attended to by a bodyguard of lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: AdamSelene235

Gold!

67 posted on 04/19/2006 2:53:13 PM PDT by Petronski (I love Cyborg!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos
From the end of February, 1975 through September, 1975, gold fell from about $185 to about $129 -- a loss of about 30% -- and by September, 1976, the price bottomed out at about $104 -- a loss of almost 45% off the 1975 high.

In February, 1983, gold topped out at about $510, but seven months later, gold was in the $365 range for a loss of nearly 29%, and by February, 1985, gold was down to about $285 for a total loss during that period of about 44%.

The peaks in 1975 and 1983 were part of the overall 1981 peak bubble price of $850/oz as you can see from the chart below.

From 1833 until 1971, the price of gold grew 97.6% or a mere .71% a year, and while not a bubble, gold failed miserbly to keep pace with inflation or equity investments.

From 1833 until 1971 the price of Gold was set by law and backed the Dollar. It did not trade as an investment and cannot be compared to equity investments. In 1971, Richard Nixon closed the Gold Window and removed the Dollar from the Gold Standard.

Would you like me to keep going?

Please do. What other "many, many" times in history has Gold been in a bubble?

68 posted on 04/19/2006 3:25:07 PM PDT by simon says what
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: bjs1779
Strongly suggest, if you intend to trade minis, that you trade at CBoT and NOT at NYMEX. CBoT is completely electronic with an excellent matching engine, and CFTC complaints about these two contracts have been essentially nil.

This is NOT the case on NYMEX, sadly. NYMEX is lagging badly in e-tech, so badly in fact that they just signed a deal with CME, none other, to put the NYMEX e-contracts on CME's Globex.

69 posted on 04/19/2006 3:56:21 PM PDT by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Attention Surplus Disorder
They just changed it again today. Spec initial margin on SI is now $5063/contract, up $675.

NYMEX margin change

70 posted on 04/19/2006 4:49:09 PM PDT by SAJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: SAJ
Do you have the margin and maintenance on crude oil and unleaded gas? Just wondering if they are playing equal or not. Thanks.
71 posted on 04/19/2006 5:23:11 PM PDT by bjs1779
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: american spirit
Lord knows what else)?

pandemic bird flu, mumps, aids, terrorists, placenta chomper Tom Cruise, Katie Holmes, AL GORE, Howard Dean....

72 posted on 04/19/2006 6:09:44 PM PDT by Revelation 911 (God is love, Love endures forever, Love God, Love your neighbor,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: A Balrog of Morgoth

"We'll never see the end of fiat money. That's wishful thinking."

FIAT has only been around since 1971. Real money (PM) has been around for 000's of years. Are you going to restate or stick with your nonsense statement.


73 posted on 04/19/2006 7:01:06 PM PDT by hubbubhubbub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: getsoutalive

"Nope, we are watching the slow death of fiat money. Short term, sure its probably run too far too fast, but expect 4 digits in the gold price in the not too distant future."

$1000 Au by 2012


74 posted on 04/19/2006 7:02:32 PM PDT by hubbubhubbub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot

"That's right. We don't make nothin' no more!!"

Yawn, the gdp number includes the money made on importing goods and selling them at a substantial mark up. Hence the Wal-Mart model. It has nothing to do with what we manufacture anymore. C'mon, you are smarter than that young man.


75 posted on 04/19/2006 7:36:45 PM PDT by mr_hammer (They have eyes, but do not see . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
"That's right. We don't make nothin' no more!!"

Yawn, the gdp number includes the money made on importing goods and selling them at a substantial mark up. Hence the Wal-Mart model. It has nothing to do with what we manufacture anymore. C'mon, you are smarter than that young man.

One more thing, it also includes medical services rendered. All those Medicare Medicaid numbers are also put into the mix. Where do those dollars come from? You got, good Ole Uncle Sam's basement printing press.

The fallacy of the service economy is crumbling quickly, same as the fallacy that illegal immigration is good for us. More neo-con dribble proving to be just that, dribble!
76 posted on 04/19/2006 7:44:53 PM PDT by mr_hammer (They have eyes, but do not see . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
So what happened when gold went from $850 to $250?

Currencies were inflating.

Gold is a hedge, not an investment. It's a storehouse of value that has remained relatively consistent. If currencies are looking weak, you take a 15% position or so to offset the decline. When the dollar starts to look strong, you sell your gold and go back to the currencies.

77 posted on 04/19/2006 8:04:04 PM PDT by Mr. Jeeves ("When the government is invasive, the people are wanting." -- Tao Te Ching)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: mr_hammer
Yawn, the gdp number includes the money made on importing goods and selling them at a substantial mark up. Hence the Wal-Mart model.

Substantial mark up? You're joking? WalMart made 6% before taxes on their sales. Less than 4% after taxes. Let me guess, public school math?

It has nothing to do with what we manufacture anymore. C'mon, you are smarter than that young man.

Let me guess, you think China's $1.8 trillion GDP means they're beating America and our $13 trillion GDP?

78 posted on 04/19/2006 8:32:21 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jeeves
Currencies were inflating.

So when gold dropped to 30% of its peak price, you could buy more than 3 times the amount of goods with the inflated dollar? That's funny!!

It's a storehouse of value that has remained relatively consistent.

Right. $850 down to $250. Consistent.

79 posted on 04/19/2006 8:36:13 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Labyrinthos

You asked "Insurance bet against what?"

Answer: Wild, rampaging Weimar inflation. Collapse of credit markets. Personal disasters like bankruptcy, seizure of assets, etc.

I hope none of this ever happens to me or to you but . . .

In the meantime, my metals have appreciated about 6 or 7 X since I bought them. The numismatic value of the coins has soared in the last couple of years. And each day lately I've grinned when I checked the spot.


80 posted on 04/19/2006 10:12:26 PM PDT by NaughtiusMaximus (Join me! Every night I pray for Global Warming . (And I think it's beginning to work.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-109 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson