Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[Don Feder] The Da Vinci Code: Blasphemy Hits the Big Screen
Human Events ^ | May 19, 2006 | Don Feder

Posted on 05/19/2006 6:28:58 PM PDT by rhema

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last
To: ExtremeUnction
I am a conservative, practicing Catholic, and my wife and I plan to see the movie this weekend.

I'm a conservative, practicing Christian. And I'm not going anywhere near it. In case you haven't noticed, this thing has taken on a life of its own, FAR more than "just entertainment." You will of course do what you like, as is your right, but don't kid yourself that it's "just a movie." The book opens with a foreword that essentially says, "I've researched this to the ends of the Earth and all the principles are true."

In case you missed the stats in this and other articles, people are believing this crap. It's proselytizing and it's the kind that will land countless souls squarely in hell. Satan is thrilled with the movement and rest assured he and his minions have helped it along. Be sure to help him some more with your dollars.

MM

21 posted on 05/19/2006 6:47:49 PM PDT by MississippiMan (Behold now behemoth...he moves his tail like a cedar. Job 40:17)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ExtremeUnction

Why? Because everyone else does? Do you feel you have to belong, connect to the mainstream culture by reading such kitschy trash and seeing a bad movie (check out the reviews on rottentomatoes.com)? Would you feel left out if you didn't read the book, didn't watch the movie? These are serious and I hope not mocking questions. Confession: I didn't start watching Seinfeld until last year in re-runs (and I don't watch anything else.) Never felt left out. No, I'm not a better person of better Christian than you. It's just I don't understand this rush to be part of the mob consuming cultural products aimed at the lowest common denominator of taste. No Kenny G, no Garth Brooks, no Brown, no Tom Clancy for this cat. Let's aim high, let's at least aspire...


22 posted on 05/19/2006 6:48:23 PM PDT by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ExtremeUnction
Because I do not think that it blasphemes our Lord. That's it! Because you are so upset, I now plan to take my family and my kids, AND THEIR FRIENDS to the movie. All Catholic school kids. All exposed to the movie. THE HORROR!!

I wont see the movie because I have already read Holy Blood and Holy Grail years ago and it is just a rehash. I also don't support Hollywood much anymore.

23 posted on 05/19/2006 6:48:43 PM PDT by frogjerk (LIBERALISM: The perpetual insulting of common sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ExtremeUnction
Men seeking spiritual wholeness came to the Temple to visit priestesses -- or hierodules -- with whom they made love and experienced the divine through physical union

You're taking kids to a movie with ideas like this?

Whatever...up to you of course.

24 posted on 05/19/2006 6:49:08 PM PDT by Siena Dreaming
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: rhema

Why not subtitle it...'A work of Hollywood fiction'. I think that would be more accurate.


25 posted on 05/19/2006 6:49:38 PM PDT by stuartcr (Everything happens as God wants it to.....otherwise, things would be different.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk

What part of "fiction" don't you get? I just finished reading the book, it is not well-written and certainly not worth all the hype that certain people seem to like to stir up over it. At best, it is a paperback to read while waiting for a flight.


26 posted on 05/19/2006 6:52:29 PM PDT by Gorobei
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: rhema
I have to disagree with Don Feder this time. This is fiction and based on a novel. It does NOT claim to be historical fact. If it was, Christians would have the right to properly take offense. Here we have speculation about Jesus and his supposed French descendents. One can understand that Dan Brown's thriller makes for exciting escapist summer reading. And reviews have said the movie isn't as good as the book. Yeah, Hollywood presents a lot of liberal drivel. But no one buys a ticket to see a movie to hear a message but to be entertained.

(Denny Crane: "Every one should carry a gun strapped to their waist. We need more - not less guns.")

27 posted on 05/19/2006 6:53:08 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robwin
Thank you for posting that. I haven't read anything by Don Feder for far too long a time, and that was excellent. His assessment of "The Code" as a terrible piece of literature was spot on, but I particularly loved this line: "This would be amusing, were it not so disgusting. Jews daily pray for the rebuilding of the Holy Temple. For what -- so men can "experience the divine" by getting a little nookie?"

I've sorely missed Feder, who's always struck me as a rightful heir to writers like Ambrose Bierce.

28 posted on 05/19/2006 6:55:07 PM PDT by rhema ("Break the conventions, keep the commandments." -- G. K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMan
I'm a conservative, practicing Christian. And I'm not going anywhere near it.

Amen. As a Catholic, it would be a grievous sin for me to support an effort that slanders my Savior and his bride the Church.

I read "Holy Blood, Holy Grail" years ago and it was one reason that lead me back to my faith (because research on the theories and "facts" within were dubious at best). But I would never have read the book if I was already a practicing Catholic because of the blasphemes contained in it.

29 posted on 05/19/2006 6:56:43 PM PDT by frogjerk (LIBERALISM: The perpetual insulting of common sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Gorobei
What part of "fiction" don't you get? I just finished reading the book, it is not well-written and certainly not worth all the hype that certain people seem to like to stir up over it. At best, it is a paperback to read while waiting for a flight.

If someone wrote a "fictional" tale about your best friend with all kinds of wild accusations wouldn't you stand up for him/her?

30 posted on 05/19/2006 6:58:04 PM PDT by frogjerk (LIBERALISM: The perpetual insulting of common sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: rhema
At least Christians can take comfort in the fact that their's isn't the only faith maligned and misrepresented by Brown's book.

Of course Judaism is the other religion that is maligned.

I wonder why he didn't include Islam? Oh, that's right, he wants to be alive to write a sequel.

31 posted on 05/19/2006 6:58:35 PM PDT by Clink ("Government is not the solution, government is the problem".--Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMan

Hi Chop, it's your former stock watching buddy, how are you.
I haven't read the book, and I won't be going to see the movie.


32 posted on 05/19/2006 6:59:16 PM PDT by psjones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Clink
I wonder why he didn't include Islam? Oh, that's right, he wants to be alive to write a sequel.

A fatwa can put an awful crimp in your lifestyle.

33 posted on 05/19/2006 7:02:33 PM PDT by rhema ("Break the conventions, keep the commandments." -- G. K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Gorobei
What part of "fiction" don't you get?

What part of "this lame excuse has been refuted on this forum numerous times" you don't understand? Short version: I'm going to write a novel in which you appear as a murderous pedophile. Fiction, you shouldn't object. At the very least do try to refute the refutations. There are certain rules governing fiction writing, that you "it's FICTION, people" don't seem to be aware of, while the rest of us, whom you take for complete idiots, do. We can accept that it's fiction, we have (big surprise!) known it all along, and still protest and critique. D'uh Vinci Code violates these rules, while Gore Vidal's novel about Abraham Lincoln (and many other historical novels) doesn't. A little edumacation goes a long way.

34 posted on 05/19/2006 7:03:05 PM PDT by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: ExtremeUnction

You seem to want to force people to go see this dreck.


35 posted on 05/19/2006 7:03:08 PM PDT by Fudd Fan (DemocRATs- the CULTURE OF TREASON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Clink
I wonder why he didn't include Islam? Oh, that's right, he wants to be alive to write a sequel.

And Feder has adroitly figured out what it'll be: "Resist the urge to determine just how bad it is by buying a ticket. You'll only be rewarding the perpetrators -- perhaps encouraging The Da Vinci Code: Part II, wherein Dan Brown reveals that Jesus was really married to Lazarus."

36 posted on 05/19/2006 7:05:17 PM PDT by rhema ("Break the conventions, keep the commandments." -- G. K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: frogjerk
I read "Holy Blood, Holy Grail" years ago and it was one reason that lead me back to my faith (because research on the theories and "facts" within were dubious at best). But I would never have read the book if I was already a practicing Catholic because of the blasphemes contained in it.

I'm a voracious reader, fifty or more novels a year plus my daily Bible reading. I tried reading one of Brown's earlier books, DIGITAL FORTRESS, I think, and the writing was so juvenile I only made it a few pages before setting it aside. I decided to give him another shot and took DVC with me on a cruise as my primary read. His writing was marginally improved and the story held my attention. Until he gradually shifted out of storytelling mode and into blasphemous preaching. At which time I tossed it into the Pacific.

MM

37 posted on 05/19/2006 7:09:33 PM PDT by MississippiMan (Behold now behemoth...he moves his tail like a cedar. Job 40:17)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: psjones

Jones!

How are you??

MM


38 posted on 05/19/2006 7:09:56 PM PDT by MississippiMan (Behold now behemoth...he moves his tail like a cedar. Job 40:17)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
But no one buys a ticket to see a movie to hear a message but to be entertained.

Fahrenheit 911 wasn't entertainment and it sold $222 million world wide.

39 posted on 05/19/2006 7:11:34 PM PDT by frogjerk (LIBERALISM: The perpetual insulting of common sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: rhema

And allow me, as another Jew, to weigh in with Feder in total agreement.


40 posted on 05/19/2006 7:11:47 PM PDT by Pharmboy (Democrats lie because they must)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson