Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

North American Union Already Starting to Replace USA
HumanEventsOnline ^ | May 30, 2006 | Jerome R. Corsi

Posted on 05/30/2006 10:01:14 AM PDT by NapkinUser

In March 2005 at their summit meeting in Waco, Tex., President Bush, President Fox and Prime Minister Martin issued a joint statement announced the creation of the “Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America” (SPP). The creation of this new agreement was never submitted to Congress for debate and decision. Instead, the U.S. Department of Commerce merely created a new division under the same title to implement working groups to advance a North American Union working agenda in a wide range of areas, including: manufactured goods, movement of goods, energy, environment, e-commerce, financial services, business facilitation, food and agriculture, transportation, and health.

SPP is headed by three top cabinet level officers of each country. Representing the United States are Secretary of Commerce Carlos Gutierrez, Secretary of Homeland Security Michael Chertoff, and Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. Representing Mexico are Secretario de Econom�Fernando Canales, Secretario de Gobernaci󮠃arlos Abascal, and Secretario de Relaciones Exteriores, Luis Ernesto Derbéz. Representing Canada are Minister of Industry David L. Emerson, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Public Safety, Anne McLellan, and Minister of Foreign Affairs Pierre Stewart Pettigrew.

Reporting in June 2005 to the heads of state of the three countries, the trilateral SPP emphasized the extensive working group structure that had been established to pursue an ambitious agenda:

In carrying out your instructions, we established working groups under both agendas of the Partnership – Security and Prosperity. We held roundtables with stakeholders, meetings with business groups and briefing sessions with Legislatures, as well as with other relevant political jurisdictions. The result is a detailed series of actions and recommendations designed to increase the competitiveness of North America and the security of our people.

This is not a theoretical exercise being prepared so it can be submitted for review. Instead, SPP is producing an action agreement to be implemented directly by regulations, without any envisioned direct Congressional oversight.

Upon your review and approval, we will once again meet with stakeholders and work with them to implement the workplans that we have developed.

And again, the June 2005 SPP report stresses:

The success of our efforts will be defined less by the contents of the work plans than by the actual implementation of initiatives and strategies that will make North America more prosperous and more secure.

Reviewing the specific working agenda initiatives, the goal to implement directly is apparent. Nearly every work plan is characterized by action steps described variously as “our three countries signed a Framework of Common Principles …” or “we have signed a Memorandum of Understanding …,” or “we have signed a declaration of intent …” etc. Once again, none of the 30 or so working agendas makes any mention of submitting decisions to the U.S. Congress for review and approval. No new U.S. laws are contemplated for the Bush administration to submit to Congress. Instead, the plan is obviously to knit together the North American Union completely under the radar, through a process of regulations and directives issued by various U.S. government agencies.

What we have here is an executive branch plan being implemented by the Bush administration to construct a new super-regional structure completely by fiat. Yet, we can find no single speech in which President Bush has ever openly expressed to the American people his intention to create a North American Union by evolving NAFTA into this NAFTA-Plus as a first, implementing step.

Anyone who has wondered why President Bush has not bothered to secure our borders is advised to spend some time examining the SPP working groups’ agenda. In every area of activity, the SPP agenda stresses free and open movement of people, trade, and capital within the North American Union. Once the SPP agenda is implemented with appropriate departmental regulations, there will be no area of immigration policy, trade rules, environmental regulations, capital flows, public health, plus dozens of other key policy areas countries that the U.S. government will be able to decide alone, or without first consulting with some appropriate North American Union regulatory body. At best, our border with Mexico will become a speed bump, largely erased, with little remaining to restrict the essentially free movement of people, trade, and capital.

Canada has established an SPP working group within their Foreign Affairs department. Mexico has placed the SPP within the office of the Secretaria de Economia and created and extensive website for the Alianza Para La Securidad y La Prosperidad de Améica del Norte (ASPAN). On this Mexican website, ASPAN is described as “a permanent, tri-lateral process to create a major integration of North America.”

The extensive working group activity being implemented right now by the government of Mexico, Canada, and the United States is consistent with the blueprint laid out in the May 2005 report of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), titled “Building a North American Community.”

The Task Force’s central recommendation is the establishment by 2010 of a North American economic and security community, the boundaries of which would be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter. (page xvii)

The only borders or tariffs which would remain would be those around the continent, not those between the countries within:

Its (the North American Community’s) boundaries will be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter within which the movement of people, products, and capital will be legal, orderly, and safe. Its goal will be to guarantee a free, secure, just, and prosperous North America. (page 3)

What will happen to the sovereignty of the United States? The model is the European Community. While the United States would supposedly remain as a country, many of our nation-state prerogatives would ultimately be superseded by the authority of a North American court and parliamentary body, just as the U.S. dollar would have to be surrendered for the “Amero,” the envisioned surviving currency of the North American Union. The CFR report left no doubt that the North American Union was intended to evolve through a series of regulatory decisions:

While each country must retain its right to impose and maintain unique regulations consonant with its national priorities and income level, the three countries should make a concerted effort to encourage regulatory convergence.

The three leaders highlighted the importance of addressing this issue at their March 2005 summit in Texas. The Security and Prosperity Partnership for North America they signed recognizes the need for a stronger focus on building the economic strength of the continent in addition to ensuring its security. To this end, it emphasizes regulatory issues. Officials in all three countries have formed a series of working groups under designated lead cabinet ministers. These working groups have been ordered to produce an action plan for approval by the leaders within ninety days, by late June 2005, and to report regularly thereafter. (pages 23-24)

Again, the CFR report says nothing about reporting to Congress or to the American people. What we have underway here with the SPP could arguably be termed a bureaucratic coup d’etat. If that is not the intent, then President Bush should rein in the bureaucracy until the American people have been fully informed of the true nature of our government’s desire to create a North American Union. Otherwise, the North American Union will become a reality in 2010 as planned. Right now, the only check or balance being exercised is arguably Congressional oversight of the executive bureaucracy, even though Congress itself might not fully appreciate what is happening.

Mr. Corsi is the author of several books, including "Unfit for Command: Swift Boat Veterans Speak Out Against John Kerry" (along with John O'Neill), "Black Gold Stranglehold: The Myth of Scarcity and the Politics of Oil" (along with Craig R. Smith), and "Atomic Iran: How the Terrorist Regime Bought the Bomb and American Politicians." He is a frequent guest on the G. Gordon Liddy radio show. He will soon co-author a new book with Jim Gilchrist on the Minuteman Project.


TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: aspan; bloodinthestreets; bushtreason; cfr; chickenlittle; corsi; crapola; cuespookymusic; doomedweredoomed; freetrade; jumptheshark; mexico; morethorazineplease; nafta; northamerica; northamericanunion; propaganda; spp; theboogeyman; theskyisfalling; tinfoil; trade
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 381-385 next last
To: SteveMcKing

The thing we ought to be doing is voting out anyone in Congress, Republican or Democrat, who is a CFR member. There are a bunch of them. It only took 14 senators to kill the whole filibuster confrontation. Instead of having the gonads to take it to a vote, they weaseled out. These CFR elites need to be stripped of their power by the people. It doesn't take a majority of them to control Congress. It takes just enough of them to keep a majority from happening.

As far as presidents go, Bush (41), Clinton, Carter, and Nixon were all CFR members or members of the Trilateral Commission. If you want to know why it doesn't make a difference if the Dems or Republicans are in power, there's your answer right there. It totally "creeped me out" to watch the 2000 election get argued all the way to the Supreme Court with CFR/Trilateralists James Baker and Warren Christopher representing the sides.


41 posted on 05/30/2006 3:24:27 PM PDT by gregwest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Rockitz
This isn't rocket science- Follow the money and you'll find the truth

Bump! So true.

42 posted on 05/30/2006 3:24:45 PM PDT by calcowgirl ("Liberalism is just Communism sold by the drink." P. J. O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl

whoops, maybe!


43 posted on 05/30/2006 5:36:59 PM PDT by Constantine XIII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl; jeffersonschild

Thanks for the ping, calcowgirl. Jeffersonschild, you'll be interested in this article, too.

I just happened to read through the document to which he refers earlier today. He's right, there's absolutely nothing in it which states any of this is a recommendation, or conditioned upon approval by the representatives and senators of the American people. It only refers to "stakeholders", business interests and other elite politicos.


44 posted on 05/30/2006 6:29:29 PM PDT by nicmarlo (Bush is the Best President Ever. Rah. Rah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Czar; Borax Queen; janetgreen; Smartass; JustPiper; La Enchiladita; DumpsterDiver

ping; another corsi article.


45 posted on 05/30/2006 6:31:05 PM PDT by nicmarlo (Bush is the Best President Ever. Rah. Rah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo

Thank you.


46 posted on 05/30/2006 7:21:57 PM PDT by Borax Queen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Borax Queen

yw


47 posted on 05/30/2006 7:31:14 PM PDT by nicmarlo (Bush is the Best President Ever. Rah. Rah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Fruitbat

"It's absurd with two diametrically opposed economic nations such as the U.S. and third world Mexico."

It's very simple, thru massive mexican imigration Bush eliminates the American middle class and lowers the standard of living to that of Mexico and the mexicans do the same to Canada and when everyone is equal it happens very easily.

Read the last part of NAFTA, it's spelled out.


48 posted on 05/30/2006 7:37:11 PM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dalereed

You're right, that's exactly where this is headed.


49 posted on 05/30/2006 7:40:19 PM PDT by Fruitbat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: dalereed

BTW, which part specifically?


50 posted on 05/30/2006 7:45:47 PM PDT by Fruitbat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Fruitbat

The last 2 pages of the 43 page summary for Congress that was put out before it was voted on.


51 posted on 05/30/2006 7:51:46 PM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser

So..what should we do to stop it?


52 posted on 05/30/2006 7:52:53 PM PDT by Recall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NapkinUser

So..what should we do to stop it?


53 posted on 05/30/2006 7:52:58 PM PDT by Recall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dalereed

Do you know where it is in the actual agreement?

Also, have you got a link to the summary?


54 posted on 05/30/2006 7:53:10 PM PDT by Fruitbat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Fruitbat

I couldn't get a copy of it, I read it in the Congressmans Office when it was a bill.

I pointed it out to him and his answer was that it was meaningless and wouldn't ever happen, He voted yes!


55 posted on 05/30/2006 8:23:21 PM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
Thanks for ping nic...
    Tree Frog
56 posted on 05/30/2006 8:52:48 PM PDT by Smartass (Vaya con Dios - And forgive us our trash baskets as we forgive those who put trash in our baskets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Smartass

yw (cute frog)


57 posted on 05/30/2006 8:55:44 PM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo

:o)


58 posted on 05/30/2006 9:04:43 PM PDT by Smartass (Vaya con Dios - And forgive us our trash baskets as we forgive those who put trash in our baskets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: nicmarlo
The naysayers will be shocked when they take the time to read the facts and then finally realize what this President and his cronies have in store for America.

Bush isn't smart enough to have planned this, he's just the sock puppet carrying out the orders from the big boys.

59 posted on 05/30/2006 9:12:36 PM PDT by janetgreen (BUSH FIDDLES WHILE AMERICA IS INVADED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: janetgreen
The naysayers will be shocked when they take the time to read the facts and then finally realize what this President and his cronies have in store for America.

They won't find out though until it's too late, because they'd rather laugh, scoff, and ridicule than educate themselves. Indeed, Bush isn't the puppeteer in this.

60 posted on 05/30/2006 9:15:53 PM PDT by nicmarlo (Bush is the Best President Ever. Rah. Rah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 381-385 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson