Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vitamin C: Cancer cure?
Philadelphia Inquirer ^ | 6/18/2006 | Marie McCullough

Posted on 06/18/2006 4:24:27 PM PDT by wjersey

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last
To: bigdcaldavis

Yeah. I don't know all the details, but things are in the works for a hell of a lot more problems than most people could ever imagine. They've totally fallen for it all-hook, line, and sinker. And mostly because of the thinking that what Lincoln did to our country was right. During his administration, 40,000 or more people were imprisioned or never heard from again. And that exact same thing will happen(with numbers proportionate to the population) because organizations like the FDA and FTC have already enslaved many to drugs in foods, ads, etc... More blatant enslavement will come through the influx of illegals and the fact that they are so uncivil, and unwilling to become civil. They are totally ripping society apart. And it is all so very unconstitutional but so was our country's Civil War...


41 posted on 09/02/2006 4:58:58 PM PDT by Mrs. Darla Ruth Schwerin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Darla Ruth Schwerin
Well, the "Ministry Of Truth" (the history revisionists over the past 140 years) want us to believe that the Civil War was fought to end slavery, when the REAL reason for the Civil War was to end states' rights. I don't condone slavery, but the constant violations of states' rights is a direct violation of the 10th Amendment. I guess the Ministry Of Truth wants us to believe that the 10th Amendment doesn't exist...just like what the real Ministry Of Love did in 1984.
42 posted on 09/02/2006 7:35:20 PM PDT by bigdcaldavis (Xandros : In a world without fences, who needs Gates?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: bigdcaldavis

Yeah, Slavery had absolutely NOTHING to do with it. Lincoln even said he could care less whether it ended or stayed. The "Slavery Issue" was instituted during reconstruction when probably even more damage was done to the South. It was strictly to put the black population in the "carpetbagger/woe is me" mentality. The North put the unqualified in charge, and disenfranchised those who knew what was going on.

And, that's exactly right. It was to put an end to state's rights which would end the rights of the state's people to address their grievances, and make the federal government "The Boss". Well, a mighty fine job was done. And everyone knows the federal government is, "The Boss" today...


43 posted on 09/03/2006 6:49:43 AM PDT by Mrs. Darla Ruth Schwerin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Darla Ruth Schwerin

Did you know that "conservative" Dwight D. Eisenhower called Fidel Castro "the Abraham Lincoln of the Caribbean"?


44 posted on 09/04/2006 9:35:01 PM PDT by bigdcaldavis (Xandros : In a world without fences, who needs Gates?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: bigdcaldavis

No. But that is a very appropriate name for slave meister, Castro...

It also proves that many in our government know of Lincoln's shenanigans and choose to do nothing about it other than watch the wind blow. They knew all along that the Historical books were laden with muck about WTBS and neglected to adequately inform a soul about the real Lincoln and his tyrrannical behavior. It also says a great deal regarding the differences between Republicans and Democrats-which are minimal, at best...


45 posted on 09/05/2006 12:24:58 PM PDT by Mrs. Darla Ruth Schwerin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Darla Ruth Schwerin
I actually misquoted the source...it was actually "the Abraham Lincoln of Latin America". I heard the exact quote on Martial Law 9/11: Rise of the Police State. That documentary makes me have an even stronger dislike of communists...I try not to hate because Jesus said "if you hate someone, you have already committed murder in your heart" and therefore violate "Thou shalt not kill".
46 posted on 09/11/2006 3:06:39 PM PDT by bigdcaldavis (Xandros : In a world without fences, who needs Gates?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: bigdcaldavis

I totally agree regarding, "Thou shalt not hate." I simply spend a minute or two, detesting the enemy. All the disgust comes to the surface then I simply turn it over to God, for he knows all men's hearts and I do not, nor do I care to know what most are thinking. I would probably lose my breakfast if I knew.

Regarding the misquote; It probably doesn't matter because it is still quite obvious that many are aware of Lincoln's maniacial rants, and they do nothing about it. I am quite certain many of the problems in today's society are a result of the continuation of Lincoln's invasion of the South. Because people know it was immoral, and that gives rise to hate group after hate group. And still our government is so fond of the centralized power, they don't give a rip about the problems created by it...


47 posted on 09/11/2006 6:06:49 PM PDT by Mrs. Darla Ruth Schwerin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Darla Ruth Schwerin

Well, anyway, you will never hear mainstream media talking about Codex Alimentarius and Healthy People 2010 because mainstream media is nothing more than the propaganda arm of the NWO. The only people I've heard talking about Codex are Pastor Butch Paugh and Alex Jones, both on their respective radio shows on GCN.

I have a blog on MySpace which exposes the false paradigm between PETA and the Center For Consumer Freedom. (News flash, people. The Center For Consumer Freedom only cares about Big Food companies increasing their profits, not the well-being of Joe Average.)

Just about everybody in PETA has ties to communism. Communism was created by the globalist bankers (the chieftains of the NWO) to con the serfs back into serfdom.

Remember the "hate crime laws" they tried to pass in Congress? Those laws would have made it a federal felony to merely hurt the feelings of "protected groups". If those laws had passed, you know that other "alternative" groups (such as wiccans, satanists, animal rights activists, and hardcore vegan activists) would have sought "protected group" status, meaning that eventually it would have been a federal felony to refer to PETA as the "Vegan Taliban".

The ACLU? They were founded by communists. When the group was founded, the founder actually stated the goal for the ACLU : "Communism is the goal". They're not for civil liberties. They are for "equeal treatment for all". Unfortunately, "equal treatment for all" can be construed to mean "equal ENSLAVEMENT for all". If one day a federal law were to be passed which would require mandatory microchip implants for sex offenders or "guest workers", the ACLU would demand either do away with chip implants altogether or chip ALL citizens. Since it would probably cost more to remove the chips than to chip everybody, guess which option the government would choose. I'm sure PETA wouldn't hesitate to cooperate with the ACLU over the issue of the NAIS (National Animal Identification System), which will require ALL animals (livestock and pets) to have microchip implants. Like I said, "equal treatment for all" can also mean "equal enslavement for all".

To be for freedom, you have to be for freedom 100%. Anything less, and you're for tyranny.


48 posted on 09/12/2006 12:18:37 PM PDT by bigdcaldavis (Xandros : In a world without fences, who needs Gates?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: bigdcaldavis

Believe me, I know all those organizations are evil. All of it seems to be coming like a tidal wave. That is what leads me to believe we are in the ends times and God sees all the evil these people are doing. There are a huge number of folks who care not for their own souls, which only reinforces that hell will be a heavily populated place. Many are choosing their ultimate destiny by worshipping an idol...


49 posted on 09/12/2006 12:44:56 PM PDT by Mrs. Darla Ruth Schwerin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: cathyval

My father was diagnosed with stage 4 colon cancer and given 6 months to live. He took Vitamin C (20 grams/day) along with certain other nutrients and He survived nearly 4 years in good health. EVERY single doctor and oncologist was against our trying this despite the reams of scientfic papers supporting it. I concluded that the Peter Principle is highly active in the medical profession.

It was life changing experience-I now work in the field of nutrition and chronic disease. The top 2 factors in health are no great mystery:
1) Real Nutrition=real health (you MUST be able to cook to avoid stuffing yourself with anti-nutrients of fast food)
2) Caloric reduction (reduce the 3,800 calories of the Standard American Diet (SAD) to at most 2,000 calories. The body can do this without cravings as long as the food you do eat is real.

Implementing these two simple things in our lives, (rather than universal Hillarycare) is the easiest and most effective measure to ensure the health of our families.


50 posted on 09/11/2007 12:53:42 PM PDT by Antioch (Benedikt Gott Geschickt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson