I'm not sure I agree with the "contempt of court" charge, here. Note to self: resist the urge to ever do the same thing...
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
To: beezdotcom
in college, when i made about 3 grand, i wrote a check to the IRS with "for killing innocent babies" in the memo line.
never heard a peep from them.
To: beezdotcom
In any sufficiently mature society, "civil servant" is semantically equivalent to "civil master." -- Robert A. Heinlein.
3 posted on
06/27/2006 11:53:42 AM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Islam Factoid:After forcing young girls to watch his men execute their fathers, Muhammad raped them.)
To: beezdotcom
Isn't that freedom of speech? I can't believe they'd put forth the time and effort to charge him with contempt. Gutsy guy....I like him!
4 posted on
06/27/2006 11:53:53 AM PDT by
derllak
To: beezdotcom
He is just telling it like it is.
He has a First Amendment right to do so.
If the check is good the State has no complaint.
Write me a good one and I could care less what you put in the remarks.
5 posted on
06/27/2006 11:54:19 AM PDT by
sgtbono2002
(The fourth estate is a fifth column.)
To: beezdotcom
I'm looking at my check. It says "for__________________" If he had put speeding, could that have been used as an admission of guilt?"
6 posted on
06/27/2006 11:54:23 AM PDT by
CindyDawg
To: beezdotcom
Thin-skinned gov't workers wielding their power.
7 posted on
06/27/2006 11:54:26 AM PDT by
Mr. Mojo
To: beezdotcom
I'm looking at my check. It says "for__________________" If he had put speeding, could that have been used as an admission of guilt?"
8 posted on
06/27/2006 11:54:32 AM PDT by
CindyDawg
To: beezdotcom
I kinda' think there is a free speech argument that could be made about that memo line.
10 posted on
06/27/2006 11:55:10 AM PDT by
capt. norm
(W.C. Fields: "The time has come to take the bull by the tail and face the situation".)
To: beezdotcom
Oh how I miss the good old United States of America where we were free.
11 posted on
06/27/2006 11:55:20 AM PDT by
Just A Nobody
(NEVER AGAIN..Support our Troops! www.irey.com and www.vets4Irey.com - Now more than Ever!)
To: beezdotcom
I don't see why this could be considered a crime. Personally, I think that the guy is a sign of the times--an example of rudeness overtaking our society. On the other hand, the courts really need to keep their eye on the ball. They've got a lot of problems to deal with that are more significant than this one, and let's face it, they've earned the level of disrespect they've gotten.
To: beezdotcom
I wonder if they would have gone after him had he not used the S-Bomb.
16 posted on
06/27/2006 11:56:27 AM PDT by
dfwgator
(Florida Gators - 2006 NCAA Men's Basketball Champions)
To: beezdotcom
If he had the words "Bull $hit Money Grab" printed on all his checks would he still be in trouble?
19 posted on
06/27/2006 11:57:41 AM PDT by
msnimje
(There is no way we can lose if we stay in Iraq and no way we can win if we cut and run.)
To: beezdotcom
"Tell me, your honor, what would be a proper method to express for this court the contempt it so richly deserves?"
20 posted on
06/27/2006 11:57:49 AM PDT by
atomicpossum
(Replies must follow approved guidelines or you will be kill-filed without appeal.)
To: beezdotcom
Well, it's nice to see the ACLU doing something good for a change.....
21 posted on
06/27/2006 11:58:22 AM PDT by
Red Badger
(Follow an IROC long enough and sooner or later you will wind up in a trailer park..........)
To: beezdotcom
Was the check written to "The city of ....." or was it written to "Clerk of courts for .....".
If it's to the city he's off scott free, if it's to the clerk of courts he'd better start praying the ACLU guy/gal knows what the hell he/she is doing with respect to arguing first amendment rights cases.
Mind you I think what he did was great and that this is a BS (to use his words) charge in the first place.
23 posted on
06/27/2006 11:59:12 AM PDT by
Bikers4Bush
(Flood waters rising, heading for more conservative ground. Vote for true conservatives!)
To: beezdotcom
I've used the expression "legal theft" in the memo line.
That check is my property (only the funds that it transfers do they take possession of) and to be returned to me for my records after it is cashed. I'd think we could write whatever we want (except for obscenities, perhaps, which could be construed as harassing public workers).
24 posted on
06/27/2006 11:59:22 AM PDT by
Ghost of Philip Marlowe
(Liberals are blind. They are the dupes of Leftists who know exactly what they're doing.)
To: beezdotcom
I worked Law Enforcement for a lot of years. I was never a big ticket writer, but it is part of the job. Many a time the person on the receiving end would make a smart ass comment or mumble curses. I was always taught to let it go. They are venting anger. Usually they are angry at themselves for making a mistake. Some are angry because they got caught. AS long as they are not creating a scene, so what. The court could have cashed the check and the whole thing would have disappeared. The check writer knows why he got the ticket. He was just venting. In a very peaceful way I might add. Some judges are too thin skinned for the job. I'd say this judge is a piece of sh@t. Wanna bring me judgy boy?
29 posted on
06/27/2006 12:01:29 PM PDT by
MPJackal
("If you are not with us, you are against us.")
To: beezdotcom
Let's see: The New York Times can divulge and publish details of secret activities designed to track down terrorists and it's "Freedom of Speech". A citizen expresses his feelings about the operations of a branch of government and it's "Contempt of Court". Somehow I don't believe that is what the Framers of the Constitution intended.
To: beezdotcom
I used the phrase, "Village Gestapo", once.
To: beezdotcom
How dare he offend the rulers? He better learn his place in society. His job is to pay taxes, follow all laws that the rulers decide to enforce when they decide to enforce them and do as he is told while he recites 'yes masters' with out ever looking at them. Hopefully, the judge will explain all this to him before he collects his additional fine.
34 posted on
06/27/2006 12:05:25 PM PDT by
paul51
(11 September 2001 - Never forget)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson