Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

‘Superman’ is back on track
MSNBC ^ | June 27, 2006 | John Hartl

Posted on 06/27/2006 8:26:41 PM PDT by jamesm113

Few big-screen franchises have fallen so far or so fast as Superman, who has been absent from multiplexes for nearly two decades. “Superman Returns” provides a most satisfying resurrection, especially for those who have always regarded the Superman story as a Christ allegory.

The first two Christopher Reeve films were big hits with critics and the public in 1978 and 1981. But it’s hard to find anyone with a kind word for “Superman III” (1983) or “Superman IV: The Quest for Peace” (1987), both of which were so out to lunch that Superman retreated to television with “Smallville,” “Superboy,” an animated series, and “Lois & Clark: The New Adventures of Superman.”

Throughout the 1990s, and especially after Reeve had a paralyzing and ultimately lethal accident, it looked like television was where the franchise would stay. It certainly did in the 1950s, when George Reeves played the Man of Steel on a weekly basis.

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: bryansinger; moviereview; superman; supermanreturns

1 posted on 06/27/2006 8:26:43 PM PDT by jamesm113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: jamesm113
especially for those who have always regarded the Superman story as a Christ allegory.

Oh, brother.

2 posted on 06/27/2006 8:37:47 PM PDT by newgeezer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jamesm113

I could care less about the "franchise". No one ever considers the comic books.

That said. Is it a good film?

And does it film the origin story yet AGAIN?

Why is it none of the Bond films showed how James Bond or ANY of the villians got where they were in life?

James Bond was ALWAYS James Bond. Goldfinger, Pussy Galore, Blofield, et al were ALWAYS bad guys.

Too much background SLOOOOOOOOOOOOWS these films down. It's not important. Too much plot getting in the way of the story.


3 posted on 06/27/2006 8:42:55 PM PDT by weegee (If fetal tissue is non-viable, then why are they trying to use it to stimulate cell production?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee

Just looking at the picture they posted shows it's gonna be a boring film. I like how Clint Eastwood does it at the end of Heartbreak Ridge. He sees his woman, she smiles, they walk off together. Doe he kiss her? No! Because Clint doesn't do those pansy roles that Tobey Maguire and the like would do.


4 posted on 06/27/2006 8:51:51 PM PDT by jamesm113
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jamesm113

Truth, Justice and the Rest of that Stuff?? Yuck!

Pray for W and Our Freedom Fighters


5 posted on 06/27/2006 8:53:55 PM PDT by bray (Hey Zaqueeri, say hello to Hitler, Stalin and Mohamhead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jamesm113

I just saw it today and this was an excellent movie, I consider it better than even the first one.


6 posted on 06/28/2006 2:52:22 PM PDT by Brett66 (Where government advances – and it advances relentlessly – freedom is imperiled -Janice Rogers Brown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson