Posted on 07/05/2006 5:21:34 AM PDT by conservativecorner
Corsi is a card-carrying lifetime member of both groups.
Whoa! You tell me. What is this, 20 questions? Why do I have to respond? I am making no assertions about anything. You are all-knowledgable about the NAU, you tell me.
But Bush III will be in office. Son, Clinton's wife will in 2010. Best bud's.(LOLOL)
The father of NAFTA couldn't get it passed, so son, Clinton did. Just keeping it in the family.
The plan was in place long before that. In fact, NWO maps were made in 1941 Map=Proof Of Evil Plan.
It is forbidden knowledge, as you can see from the website, so keep it under your toup.
Dang! Where the hell's the New York Times now that we need them?
I didn't blame the new world order on him. I said he was the first one I had ever heard mention it. All of this crap goes back to the League of Nations.
Here's the info:
2nd Annual Inland Ports Across North America
(IPANA) Conference San Antonio, Texas
October 11-13, 2006
"Make plans to join NASCO and San Antonios Free Trade Alliance for the 2nd Annual IPANA Conference being held on October 11-13, 2006 at the historic Menger Hotel. Please check the NASCO web site for updates about the conference.
IPANA provides inland ports with a unique conference focused on port development, security, industry trends and infrastructure issues. This conference provides port projects that are in the conceptual stage to fully operational projects with an opportunity to hear and learn from industry experts directly and network with other port officials, shippers, brokers and other conference attendees.
Last year over 120 people participated in the conference representing various port projects in Mexico, Canada and the U.S. We expect this years conference to double in size. The focus of this years conference is Rail. We have invited Mr. Michael Haverty, CEO of Kansas City Southern, to serve as the keynote speaker."
Also, are you planning on attending any of the TTC's 54 open meetings in Texas from now through August?
What happens? The black-helicopter fruitcakes act as though it's an issue of first impression. The same people that were beating this to death years ago (here, I mean) are beating it to death again, and acting as though they don't remember doing it the first time.
I should add that, if I ever write a book, I want Corsi's publisher's marketing staff to flog it for me.
You are correct that Reagan couldn't get NAFTA passed, but he had to deal with a Democrat-controlled Congress. Not sure what you mean by Clinton being Reagan's son, however.
You are a little late. I have have already posted the site showing the 54 locations and dates on a number of threads.
I don't guess you will be at any meetings since you are from Utah.
You obviously didn't get the memo. The CFR is a shadow government. It's got all kinds of freemasons and illuminati members.
It's the boogeyman of all boogeymen.
It hides under your bed at night plotting THE END OF SOVEREIGNTY AS WE KNOW IT.
Well, now you know it goes way back to The Scary Map, and maybe you'll be more skeptical of conspiracies.
By the way, Bush 41 first mentioned the phrase "New World Order" in a speech on Sept. 11, 1990, which has conspiracy theorists in an "eleven years to the day!" tizzy.
Now, you know Reagan never mention the North American Free Trade agreement while he was in office. He only mention a vision just like Goldwater did in 1964.
The first mention of the North American Free Trade Treaty and the New World Order was done by you free traders mentor, George H. Bush. Now, why don't you free traders like to claim George H. Bush as your mentor? LOLOLOL
Well, I must not have heard that speech.
We live on a continent whose three countries possess the assets to make it the strongest, most prosperous and self-sufficient area on Earth. Within the borders of this North American continent are the food, resources, technology and undeveloped territory which, properly managed, could dramatically improve the quality of life of all its inhabitants.It is no accident that this unmatched potential for progress and prosperity exists in three countries with such long-standing heritages of free government. A developing closeness among Canada, Mexico and the United States--a North American accord--would permit achievement of that potential in each country beyond that which I believe any of them--strong as they are--could accomplish in the absence of such cooperation. In fact, the key to our own future security may lie in both Mexico and Canada becoming much stronger countries than they are today.
No one can say at this point precisely what form future cooperation among our three countries will take. But if I am elected President, I would be willing to invite each of our neighbors to send a special representative to our government to sit in on high level planning sessions with us, as partners, mutually concerned about the future of our continent. First, I would immediately seek the views and ideas of Canadian and Mexican leaders on this issue, and work tirelessly with them to develop closer ties among our peoples. It is time we stopped thinking of our nearest neighbors as foreigners.
Ronald Reagan, November 13, 1979.
You never know. I think it would be interesting. I'll keep ya posted.
At last, now we know where Bush 41 got his "vision thing".
That's going to leave a mark.
But, Reagan didn't actually say the phrase "North American Free Trade Treaty". He said "North American Accord", which is the same thing, of course, but I don't think tex will buy it.
By the way, if anyone wants to get into the "real meetings", not the fake meetings for the rubes mentioned above, just sign up for my newsletter ( $2500/year) and you'll receive the locations and also the secret handshake needed to get in.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.