And by your response, you show no intellect. What part of the article do you wish to refute with facts, if any? Name calling qualifies you for DU, and not Free Republic where we have discussion and dialog without the name calling.
We do plenty of name-calling at FR.
What part of "IT'S A FREAKING ROAD" do you not understand?
Actually, we seem to have more name calling and pissing matches than discussion now. Too many want to attack someones position rather than simply prove them wrong. That being said, I would like to see more information from both sides of the issue before I make any decisions. I know certain forces twist the truth and the facts to get their way. I also understand the insidious nature of government. This whole road thing stinks of either propaganda or NWO.
The article was fine in that the grammar was good and there were very few spelling errors. I'd been looking for more than that; I'd hoped that Corsci would offer specific reasons why we shouldn't update our roads. Speaking as a civil engineer (with a registration certificate signed by Ronald Reagan), I can say that today's Interstate system is as inappropriate for this era as the state highway system (eg. route 66) was in the '50's --not withstanding Henry Ford's original endorsement.
We need modern roads so we can be free and so we can defend ourselves. Corsci doesn't want this and doesn't explain why.