Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Gay State Conservative
One could understand such a thing if divorce proceedings hadn't been initiated...that is,if the recipient was his secret girlfriend...but that doesn't seem to be the case here.

Thank you, the previous case was a "secret girlfriend" situation
12 posted on 07/08/2006 6:42:39 AM PDT by HangnJudge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: HangnJudge
Thank you, the previous case was a "secret girlfriend" situation

Do you mean that the case described in the original post was a "secret girlfriend" situation? If you do,I guess that in the very strictest sense of that term,his wife *was* his secret girlfriend because her existence hadn't been revealed to the new "fiance".

But were he and his wife living together at the time? Were they sleeping together? Divorce proceedings *had* been initiated..and were almost complete.

Unless there's something that I'm missing here..or that hasn't been disclosed in the article...I'm not sure that she has the *moral* right to keep the ring.

13 posted on 07/08/2006 7:02:15 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson