Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
To: Texaggie79
This is why women should change all the soiled diapers.
2 posted on
07/12/2006 2:01:59 PM PDT by
MeanWestTexan
(Many at FR would respond to Christ "Darn right, I'll cast the first stone!")
To: Texaggie79
Whose poop is Drudge ... naaah. Too easy.
To: Texaggie79
4 posted on
07/12/2006 2:02:26 PM PDT by
garyhope
("In vino veritas" Especially a good red wine with a nice grilled steak and baked potato.)
To: Texaggie79
And we pay for this 'crap' with our taxes!
Literally!
5 posted on
07/12/2006 2:03:32 PM PDT by
Bigh4u2
(Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
To: Texaggie79
Was this happily paid for with our tax dollars?
To: Texaggie79
I'd love to read the research proposal that was submitted on this topic and beat out the competition. And what do you suppose the funding agency was soliciting proposals to study?
To: Texaggie79
I've been changing diapers continuously for the past five years. Call it 6000 diapers, conservatively.
Suffice to say I have no sense of smell left now, at all.
10 posted on
07/12/2006 2:03:54 PM PDT by
Eepsy
(Hocus pocus alamagocus!)
To: Texaggie79
To: Texaggie79
too much time on someone's hand
12 posted on
07/12/2006 2:04:23 PM PDT by
woofie
("Romper, bomper, stomper, boo. Tell me, tell me, tell me do.Magic mirror, tell me today.)
To: Texaggie79
In a new study, 13 mothers were asked to sniff soiled diapers belonging to both their own child and others from an unrelated baby.We might assume they were paid to do this (why would they do it otherwise?), and this would definitely be a winner in the all-time "And You Think Your Job Stinks!" category.
14 posted on
07/12/2006 2:05:00 PM PDT by
xJones
To: Texaggie79
mothers were asked to sniff soiled diapers belonging to both their own child and others from an unrelated baby.mmmmmm where do I sign up for that?
16 posted on
07/12/2006 2:05:28 PM PDT by
Texaggie79
(Did I just say that?)
To: Texaggie79
It just may be possible that we evolved from that #2.
Countless mutations over a long period of time...hey, who knows?
18 posted on
07/12/2006 2:06:21 PM PDT by
Seeking the truth
(0cents.com - Freep Stuff & Pajama Patrol Stuff)
To: Texaggie79
WAY MORE information than necessary.
To: Texaggie79
Well, I prefer chanel No.5 and White Shoulders on my favorite women...but, to each his own.
20 posted on
07/12/2006 2:07:39 PM PDT by
EagleUSA
To: Texaggie79
A similar but unrelated item: 500 managers and executives took part in a double blind study in which it was conclusively determined that each preferred the smell of his own poop, in particular over that of his subordinates...
24 posted on
07/12/2006 2:12:59 PM PDT by
Hegemony Cricket
(Rugged individualists of the world, unite!)
To: Texaggie79
Hmmm.. As the father of three, I know I've cleaned up messes, in diapers and outside of them, without a second thought. But if I had to do this for anyone but my kids, I couldn't do it. No way. I always thought that maybe the mind just blocks any real thought in those situations, so that you do what needs to be done. But maybe this study has hit on the answer -- I could clean up the messes because I found my kids' stuff less revolting.
To: Texaggie79
I'm sure there's something to this.... because my poop smells better than everyone elses too!
27 posted on
07/12/2006 2:17:20 PM PDT by
MarineBrat
(Muslims - The "flesh eating bacteria" version of humans.)
To: Texaggie79
Did they note if the mothers breast fed or not?
28 posted on
07/12/2006 2:17:51 PM PDT by
dhs12345
To: Texaggie79
Who funded this trash?
More "evolutionary" theories?
Ridiculous and disgusting.
30 posted on
07/12/2006 2:19:00 PM PDT by
nmh
(Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God) !)
To: Texaggie79
One smart man and he felt smart.
Two smart men and the both felt smart.
Three smart men and they all felt smart.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson