 |
iPod |
| Send FReepmail if you want on/off iPing list WARNING: This is a high-volume Ping list. Turn your headphones down |
|
| The List of Ping Lists | |
Posted on 11/19/2006 12:25:48 AM PST by Swordmaker
And they'll sit on the large screen version as long as it takes them to get the new hybrid touchscreen right. Unlike MS and the entire satellite industry around Windows, Apple isn't willing to ship something that's half-baked out the door because "market experts" demand that they do it.
They're taking their time and they're doing it right.
We have at least one FReeper that works on the iPod for Apple doing software (might be a company contracting with Apple). He's explained it a number of times.
You obviously never had to support that POS.
No, I think I was about 9 when it was released. Maybe that's why I loved it... ;-P
It should also be noted that while the screen is physically slightly bigger than the iPod's, it contains the exact same number of pixels. So you're not getting any extra screen real estate, and you also get the added benefit of having most of your videos stretched out of proportion. Go Microsoft!
Actually, what I'd like to see is an AM tuner. I think it's pretty self-evident that the reason most people carry around MP3 players is to avoid generic FM radio in the first place; besides, if you want to listen to the radio, you can do that with a Walkman that costs $15 and has the tuner built into the headphones. But at least an AM tuner would let me quickly switch over and get a talk radio fix if I felt the need.
|
iPod |
| Send FReepmail if you want on/off iPing list WARNING: This is a high-volume Ping list. Turn your headphones down |
|
| The List of Ping Lists | |
Egad.
I read that whole thing and the Zune -- that really really really is a problem.
It should also be noted that while the screen is physically slightly bigger than the iPod's, it contains the exact same number of pixels. So you're not getting any extra screen real estate, and you also get the added benefit of having most of your videos stretched out of proportion.It's the size not the resolution that is important because the video content isn't able to take advantage of any higher resolution. If what you said is true, people would watch standard (not HD) TV on iPod-sized devices. Go Apple Fanboys!
They seem to be. It might not be sarcasm, though, but irony.
I love the Shuffle, it's just what I need, no more, no less.
Well, it makes zero difference to me which device wins out. With that said, the iPod has dominated for years. Just because the Zune realizes extremely short-term market success in the niche crowd of people who must have something before everyone else does not make it a market winner. Only time will tell. People should monitor for useful market data over three, six, and twelve month windows rather than attempting to draw meaningful conclusions from a single, likely-anomalous data point.
And they'll sit on the large screen version as long as it takes them to get the new hybrid touchscreen right. Unlike MS and the entire satellite industry around Windows, Apple isn't willing to ship something that's half-baked out the door because "market experts" demand that they do it.Wow, the ignorance of this comment is staggering. Here are a few of Apple computers duds:
The real danger to innovation is a dearth of competition. Apple is a publicly traded company, in business to make money for the shareholders. Give them a monopoly and they will raise prices and stop spending money on innovation.
Actually, the iTunes store sells their video at 640x480. They claim it's so that it will look better when you pipe your videos from your iPod to a TV, but most people believe they're just planning ahead for the 6G iPod. My original comment stands: The Zune's screen, while slightly bigger, is no better, and will just stretch many videos out of their aspect ratio.
Go Apple Fanboys? Well, if that's how you wish to define "the entire consumer base of planet Earth," be my guest.
Go Apple Fanboys? Well, if that's how you wish to define "the entire consumer base of planet Earth," be my guest.No, it's how I define people like you that seem to feel it is some sort of religion rather than just another company selling products.
Hey, if Microsoft would bother to make a better product, I'd buy it.
Hey, if Microsoft would bother to make a better product, I'd buy it.I hear ya. Quite frankly, I'd be happy with my current device (a 3G iPod) if I could play the content I purchased from iTMS on other devices (like my Tivo). However, I don't think we'll get there until someone takes away a sizable percentage of Apple's market share. Microsoft is the only company I see with the marketing muscle to pull that off. I also think they are in a good position to leverage their other platforms (XBox, Media Center), assuming Apple doesn't get there first.
Uh, at the distances you watch either the Zune's or the iPod's screens, the slightly smaller screen on the iPod would look the same size as the Zune's simply by holding it about 1 inch closer to your eyes. These are not large screen HD TVs, you know.
<<
Apple Newton
>>
I use my Newton every day. I especially love the GPS module I use when kayaking.
Msoft does suck. Look at Explorer -- MS has 20 billion in cash and can't hire someone who can read and understand the CSS specification. I do Web design for a living and 50% of my work is making stuff work with that sh*tty Explorer browser.
Zune on Amazon.com Sales Rank: #44 in Electronics (See http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/new-for-you/top-sellers/-/electronics/all/ref=pd_dp_ts_e_1/103-9152512-0225443 )
Get this turkey while it’s still getable.
~~~~~~~~~~
Apple holds 4 of the 5 top positions.
Heh heh... and I thought this was another "fear, uncertainty, doubt" article. :'D
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.