Skip to comments.
London Stock Trader Urges Move to 'AMERO'
World Net Daily ^
| 11/28/06
| Jerome R. Corsi
Posted on 11/28/2006 6:10:53 AM PST by Kimberly GG
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 261-264 next last
To: Kimberly GG
It's that they know it's true, support the OBL agenda, and don't want it discussed. Attacking any legitimate article or proof is SOP.Bump.
41
posted on
11/28/2006 7:28:24 AM PST
by
Paul Ross
(Ronald Reagan-1987:"We are always willing to be trade partners but never trade patsies.")
To: MadIvan
You said you couldn't find Steve Previs on the internet.
Why are you calling me a kook? Because you were wrong?
42
posted on
11/28/2006 7:29:58 AM PST
by
hedgetrimmer
(I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
To: woodbutcher
I don't know if you've noticed, but Fox is a true lame duck, his successor just waiting for the term of office to begin and Bush only has a couple of busy years left.
I guess they'd better get this thing moving, huh? It's so hard to run the conspiracy, though, what with all of you meddling kids!
43
posted on
11/28/2006 7:31:33 AM PST
by
AmishDude
(Mark Steyn is my hero.)
To: MadIvan
It's rubbish. See post 37.
Regards, Ivan
It is my belief that the instability of the Mexican government, its corruption, the craziness displayed in their last election, the Canadian governments latest idea of partitioning itself so there is a French nation within Canada, will make the Amero idea too dangerous and idea and it will die a natural death.
However, that said, it is a very serious matter that our president would even attend a meeting at which such a discussion would be on the agenda.
He should have told them to scratch it or he would go ride his horse at the ranch.
So the question again is why did he even discuss it? The Amero, open borders and the super highway from Mexico to Canada; three ideas in combination that are worrisome.
They may never happen, but the question again is why do we have people in high places even considering it? Do we have the right people? You expect this from nutty university professors, not the president
To: hedgetrimmer
I told you exactly what parameters I used. I didn't find Steve Previs that way.
Secondly, you are by reputation (and my experience) an anti-free trade kook who probably believes in this Amero nonsense.
Ivan
45
posted on
11/28/2006 7:31:44 AM PST
by
MadIvan
(I aim to misbehave.)
To: woodbutcher
The single currency idea for NAFTA had its heyday, so far as I can tell, around 1999 - 2000, when a series of discussion papers were passed around. This was, remember, when people thought the Euro was going to be a benefit to Europe's economies. Given what a disaster the Euro has been for countries like Italy, that view has since been revisited. I think what the Bank of Canada said (dated Winter 2005 / 2006) is correct - that America has no interest in re-cooking a failed recipe.
Regards, Ivan
46
posted on
11/28/2006 7:34:09 AM PST
by
MadIvan
(I aim to misbehave.)
To: Kimberly GG
GREAT IDEA. We switch to the "Amero", and leave all the chumps holding " US Dollar Securities" holding the bag! Buy did we play those foreigners as chumps or what? /sarc
47
posted on
11/28/2006 7:34:46 AM PST
by
Kozak
(Anti Shahada: " There is no God named Allah, and Muhammed is his False Prophet")
To: TheRobb7; Kimberly GG
I'll vote for "move to chat" LOL ........... your VOTE doesn't matter at all, this is The North American Community.
;-)
48
posted on
11/28/2006 7:36:28 AM PST
by
beyond the sea
( Whiskey For My Men, Beer For My Horses)
To: July 4th
"Yeah, the US is just going to up and drop the world's most prominent brand for something that no one's ever heard of."
I think the Germans and the French felt very much the same about the Mark and the Franc, respectively. What currency are they using these days?
The only thing constant is change. If the "leaders" decide we're going to be an American union, we're powerless to stop them.
49
posted on
11/28/2006 7:54:53 AM PST
by
brownsfan
(It's not a war on terror... it's a war with islam.)
To: MadIvan
50
posted on
11/28/2006 7:56:07 AM PST
by
texastoo
("trash the treaties")
To: texastoo; MadIvan
This dude is no slouch and neither is his company.This company is small potatoes.
Jefferies International Limited has in excess of $2 billion of investment assets under management.
51
posted on
11/28/2006 8:08:39 AM PST
by
Toddsterpatriot
(If you agree with EPI, you're not a conservative!)
To: Wolverine
And 75 percent of people in the United States and Canada, and two-thirds of Mexicans, support the development of a North American security perimeter. The U.S., Mexican, and Canadian governments remain zealous defenders of an outdated conception of sovereignty even though their citizens are ready for a new approach. Propaganda for the masses, nothing but lies. I would guess that the ONLY nation who want a "new approach" with open borders is Mexico. The people who spread this crap think that if they say it often enough, people will believe it.
No one does, and everyone should be calling the guy in the White House, who wants this, and their Senators and Reps who hopefully will fight against this insanity.
To: Toddsterpatriot
This company is small potatoes.So, is this a crime or is it a reputable company?
53
posted on
11/28/2006 8:27:30 AM PST
by
texastoo
("trash the treaties")
To: MadIvan; All
Hello, my name is AmishDude and I'm here to talk to you about the NORTH AMERICAN UNION or NAU. You may be familiar with some of our previous work: the moon landing, Area 51 and, of course, the Kennedy assassination. Our shining moment.
We here at the NAU want to change the way you look at international conspiracies. We want to be your kind of cabal.
We are a diverse group. So many of you perceive us as being a bunch of Jewish bankers. But that's not true. Some of us are Swiss bankers and others are Jewish lawyers.
Not only that, we are looking to make sure that you, the little people, are involved in your conspiracies. For example, the NAU wants your input on our new AMEROs. While those of us who run the conspiracy can't afford to have our faces seen, we want to know whose faces should be on the currency: Santa Ana? Jefferson Davis? The Maple Leaf?
We want to address the concerns of our subjects, uh, citizens. Think of us as YOUR overlords. We aren't just a nameless, faceless cabal.
...
Well, we are, but we're YOUR nameless, faceless cabal and we want you to think of us in the same warm and fuzzy way that you think of mom.
Who secretly works for us.
54
posted on
11/28/2006 8:27:35 AM PST
by
AmishDude
(Mark Steyn is my hero.)
To: Toddsterpatriot
If this guy is an executive, their potatoes will get even smaller.
55
posted on
11/28/2006 8:29:29 AM PST
by
AmishDude
(Mark Steyn is my hero.)
To: texastoo
It's a reputable company that's been around for 40+ years.
Just because one trader says something silly, doesn't give it any more credence than if Willie Green said it. I could walk down the hall and get 10 traders to say this guy is an idiot.
56
posted on
11/28/2006 8:31:39 AM PST
by
Toddsterpatriot
(If you agree with EPI, you're not a conservative!)
To: Kimberly GG
Kooky Corsi and World Nut Daily - Damn if we could ONLY have Joe Farah and Tom Tancredo weigh in on this issue it would be a NAU circle jerk!!!
Woohoo!!!
57
posted on
11/28/2006 8:34:06 AM PST
by
MikefromOhio
(Prayers for my cousin Jeff and his family.)
To: texastoo
Read post 37 and what the Bank of Canada had to say about it. Then, go away.
I understand banking and monetary policy pretty well, which you do not. I repeat, anyone who thinks there will be an Amero in the near future is a barking loon.
Ivan
58
posted on
11/28/2006 8:38:43 AM PST
by
MadIvan
(I aim to misbehave.)
To: Toddsterpatriot
I think we should give the academics who discussed this idea back in 1999 and 2000 a call; we should tell them that apparently some people consider them all powerful and are indeed going to determine monetary policy in the future.
Regards, Ivan
59
posted on
11/28/2006 8:40:48 AM PST
by
MadIvan
(I aim to misbehave.)
To: Kimberly GG
"...will have a big impact on everybody's life, in Canada, the U.S. and Mexico."
That's the understatement of the year. A common currency won't raise Mexico up--it will only bring the living standards in the U.S. down. We don't even have a common currency now, and parts of America are sinking into third world status.
60
posted on
11/28/2006 8:42:23 AM PST
by
rottndog
(WOOF!!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 261-264 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson