Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: wolfcreek

"I see the Medved fans jumped on this thread like flies on a chit wagon. It's not that they think the NAU is a conspiracy freaks wet dream, it's because the NAU is theirs."

Of course they did and of course it is "theirs", which is why my question above is being intentionally ignored. Nonetheless, I would venture to guess that were I to do a bit of research, I imagine Jerome Corsi would have been considered quite the hero around here, having seen to it that GWB won the '04 elections. The fact that he's been relegated to 'conspiracy theorists' by the forces that be, consistent with the perfectly timed attacks every time the subject is mentioned and the moving of the threads, can only lead to the conclusions that indeed it "is theirs" and FR is supporting the efforts.

What isn't clear is why they are ashamed to admit it.


32 posted on 01/02/2007 3:07:00 PM PST by Kimberly GG (PATRIOTS MARCH TO "TAKE BACK AMERICA" (www.lframerica.com ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: Kimberly GG
consistent with the perfectly timed attacks every time the subject is mentioned

You consider criticism of a thread that is posted "perfectly timed attacks"?

Have their been any "perfectly timed attacks" not on a thread espousing your conspiracy theory?

How paranoid are you?

35 posted on 01/02/2007 3:21:25 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: Kimberly GG

John O'Neill was a good spokesperson for the Vets for Truth, although one of the less politically known guys should have been used -- they had some really good apolitical guys who I heard speak who spoke very well and would have forced the media to look into "who they were", rather than being able to dismiss them like they did O'Neill.

The biggest liability to the Vets for Truth group was Jerome Corsi, who was easily linked to hateful and crazy ideas and speech, and through that the opponents were able to smear the Vets book by association. It left the supporters of the Vets for Truth having to explain that Corsi simply edited the book, and wasn't involved in actually writing what was in it. Not very helpful at all.


57 posted on 01/03/2007 9:00:19 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: Kimberly GG

And I seriously doubt there is a group of Freepers here who would SUPPORT the NAU, which is the real reason nobody is answering your claim. You are waiting for one of the supporters, and there are none.

Most of us don't denounce Corsi because he is attacking something we believe in, but because he is like The Boy who Cried Wolf, only there's never actually a Wolf.


58 posted on 01/03/2007 9:02:05 AM PST by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson