Posted on 01/05/2007 10:48:25 AM PST by jmc813
Conservative blogger John Hawkins of Right Wing News has now decided to join Michael Medved in a new ad hominem attack by using a disparaging adjective to call me a name (“kooky”) and placing me No. 3 in the list of the 20 “people on the right” he finds most annoying.
Hawkins places me between No. 2 Mark Foley, whom Hawkins characterizes as a “page-molesting pervert,” and No. 4 Duke Cunningham, the congressman Hawkins notes is “going to jail for 8 years after taking a bribe.” I am honored to be included on any list John Hawkins wishes to create. But, as far as I can determine, my offense to Hawkins involves writing with the scope of the 1st Amendment, an offense that Hawkins considers somewhat worse than taking bribes, but not quite as bad as making salacious approaches to underage male employees.
I first want to thank Hawkins for his continuing campaign to draw attention to my arguments.
Second, I wonder how much additional writing I will have to produce before Hawkins reduces himself to the “liar, liar” ranting stage Michael Medved exhibited in his recent emotional tirade published on Townhall.com. I guess I will have to read more of Hawkins’s writing to determine if I find his views annoying, but upon introspection I find I have no emotional reaction whatsoever, even to his characterization that I am somehow “annoying” to him. Perhaps President Bush drew solace that he was listed seven positions below me on Hawkins’s “most annoying” list. I apologize to President Bush that Hawkins could not find a better pejorative for him than “incompetent.” Clearly in Hawkins’s hierarchy to be “kooky” in writing a political commentary is much more annoying to him than to be merely “incompetent” in conducting the affairs of the nation’s highest elected post.
Arguing that my writings advance a “completely moronic North American conspiracy theory,” Hawkins linked to an old post he had written on his blog last summer. In an exchange published in July on HUMAN EVENTS’ Right Angle blog, I answered these and other objections raised by Hawkins. The exchange ended when Hawkins chose not to respond. Hawkins has never answered my last specific rebuttals published on the blog. Merely repeating his initial arguments would be considered “non responsive” in traditional debate theory.
Besides, I have never argued a “North American conspiracy.” The European Union and the Euro are realities today, not a conspiracy theory. So too, North American integration is proceeding rapidly right now, fully documented, as the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America attests if you reference the Department of Commerce website SPP.gov. Equally, the Trans-Texas Corridor is proceeding rapidly, as documented by the Texas Department of Commerce website. If either the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America or the Trans-Texas Corridor is a conspiracy, the conspiracy is being perpetrated by government officials on their public websites.
We will grant that the now public writings of those who advanced the European Union, such as the memoirs of EU intellectual architect Jean Monnet, confess after the fact that a stealth method was pursued to create the European Union. As Christopher Booker and Richard North, co-authors of the 2003 book, “The Great Deception: A Secret History of the European Union,” write that Jean Monnet “knew that only by operating in the shadows, behind a cloak of obscurity could he one day realize his dream.” Architects of North American integration, such as Robert Pastor of American University, breathe new life into stealth politics when suggesting openly that a new 9/11 crisis may be just the event needed to advance his agenda for creating the “North American Community” he openly professes.
At any rate, I invite Hawkins to resume his debate with me. To make the process easy, we will link to the exchange. Seeing that I wrote the last rejoinder there, the next move appears to be up to Hawkins. Is Hawkins up to calm, rational debate, or does he want to leave his comments at the level of calumny, an ad hominem attack which always belies an inability to win the argument any other way?
My writing has been aimed at making sure that North American integration does not advance to the point where a North American Union emerges after what may be a decades-long incremental process. I want to be sure that the United States does not follow the template set in place by how the European Union and the euro emerged over some fifty years, driven by an intellectual elite and evolving step-by-step from an initial, seemingly innocuous continental steel and coal agreement.
What is it exactly that Hawkins finds annoying—that a NAU and the Amero could be the end result of the North American integration currently happening, or that I might suggest the Bush Administration could be following the Jean Monnet path intentionally?
ping
Interesting. Thanks for posting.
thanks!
TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Click to Add Topic
KEYWORDS: Click to Add Keyword
Corsi is on game!
ping for later.
Ping. FYI.
Ping.
Hey, it's been over a half hour, where are all the anti-corsi people who show up immediately whenever something of his is posted?
Lunatics often win the battle because the sane people eventually tire of the battle and move on, while the insane person is, well, insane.
That's more of a general observation, not a direct link between the words "Corsi" and "insane" or "Lunatic".
If Corsi is panicked over a highway linking two countries, nobody should mention to him those big river-things that seem to run all over the place allowing people just to move right through the country by boat.
chuckling! He must brandish a clove of garlic whenever he hears reference to those "big river-things", and panics to himself... "Me, Mungo..sun god must be angry." ;>
Yo, Ben! Over here! Wouldn't want ya to miss an opportunity to sprinkle a little snake oil.
Ca-bing:
... "I apologize to President Bush that Hawkins could not find a better pejorative for him than 'incompetent.' Clearly in Hawkins’s hierarchy to be 'kooky' in writing a political commentary is much more annoying to him than to be merely 'incompetent' in conducting the affairs of the nation’s highest elected post."
Ca-bong:
... "The European Union and the Euro are realities today, not a conspiracy theory. So too, North American integration is proceeding rapidly right now, fully documented, as the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America attests if you reference the Department of Commerce website SPP.gov. Equally, the Trans-Texas Corridor is proceeding rapidly, as documented by the Texas Department of Commerce website. If either the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America or the Trans-Texas Corridor is a conspiracy, the conspiracy is being perpetrated by government officials on their public websites."
Ca-blam:
... "What is it exactly that Hawkins finds annoying—that a NAU and the Amero could be the end result of the North American integration currently happening, or that I might suggest the Bush Administration could be following the Jean Monnet path intentionally?"
Then Wes Vernon provided the missing link, Corsi's father organized the United Transportation Workers Union.
Well Jerome, believing that President Bush is going to abolish the Constitution and destroy our currency, the most respected currency in the world, by merging it with the meaningless Canadian dollar and the basket case peso thereby crushing our economy is, well, kooky. Do you also think he'll accomplish all this by January 2009? This has nothing to do with ad hominem attacks. Hawkins and Medved are just stating the obvious. If you're going to incite this kind of conspiratorial nonsense maybe you should grow thicker skin.
My writing has been aimed at making sure that North American integration does not advance to the point where a North American Union emerges...
Your writing has been aimed at selling books by appealing to the paranoid instincts of those who don't possess the critical thinking skills necessary to see you for the opportunist and demagogue you really are.
For example: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1762982/posts
These people are ruining our country. They are doing it in "plain sight." The problem is the sheeple don't realize how dangerous this is to their freedom.
Thanks for the post.
Even though we share the same initials, I'm not Jerome Corsi.
Seems as though everyone on both sides of the railroad tracks has a vested interest in this. What's yours?
"The problem is the sheeple don't realize how dangerous this is to their freedom."
Not sure anymore if the sheeple really want freedom.
I've come to the conclusion that feeling comfortable(with their heads in the sand)is more important to them.
It's amazing how easily they are lead around by their noses.
Perhaps there is more than a little truth to the saying, 'ignorance is bliss'.
Borders Language Culture "BLC" Savage Nation Ping
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.