interesting. legally, I don't know how this would go. but knowing how many on here feel about alimony in general, I thought this would be an interesting discussion on a new twist to it.
1 posted on
03/28/2007 9:20:03 AM PDT by
stompk
To: stompk
He should get all his money back.........with interest!......
2 posted on
03/28/2007 9:21:28 AM PDT by
Red Badger
(If it's consensus, it's not science. If it's science, there's no need for consensus......)
To: stompk
Julia Roach, 55, has had a sex change and legally changed her name to Julio Roberto Silverwolf.Oh my, an addadicktome.
To: stompk
This is a good try on the part of the ex-hubby, but I don't think it will hold water.
4 posted on
03/28/2007 9:22:02 AM PDT by
HitmanLV
("If at first you don't succeed, keep on sucking until you do suck seed." - Jerry 'Curly' Howard)
To: stompk
$1,250 a month? $15k a year?
5 posted on
03/28/2007 9:22:41 AM PDT by
mysterio
To: stompk
Interesting case, but I don't see it going to far.
To: stompk
If Florida - where crazy things keep happening - recognizes her as being a man, then obviously there should be no alimony and the marriage declared a fraud.
I saw a case on Court TV where the children were taken away from the biological mother and given to a woman who had a sex change operation and declared herself a man. They children were upset - that had to leave with that freaky looking person. Another sick decision made by Florida courts - they must be among the worst in the country.
10 posted on
03/28/2007 9:26:10 AM PDT by
Dante3
To: stompk
More legally unchartered shiite, in keeping with the gay/pervert agenda. A pox on all of them.
To: stompk
legally changed her name to Julio Roberto SilverwolfLegally changed name means Julia is legally a non-entity. Judgement was for her, not Julio.
12 posted on
03/28/2007 9:27:36 AM PDT by
N. Theknow
((Kennedys - Can't drive, can't fly, can't ski, can't skipper a boat - But they know what's best.))
To: stompk
Clearwater, Florida, is the new San Francisco.
14 posted on
03/28/2007 9:30:32 AM PDT by
madprof98
("moritur et ridet" - salvianus)
To: stompk
He agreed to pay
her alimony.
She is no longer a
"her", and the woman he agreed to pay alimony no longer exists as a legal, female, entity.
I'd say the income stream should dry up.
Besides, what guy would want to be paying alimony to a "guy"?
18 posted on
03/28/2007 9:35:24 AM PDT by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly.)
To: stompk
I wonder if the new "man" is now able to marry a women? Or does the state still view the "man" as a women, preventing it from marrying an actual women?
20 posted on
03/28/2007 9:40:27 AM PDT by
A Texan
(Oderint dum metuant)
To: stompk
Guys usually get screwed in a divorce. It looks like Julia had to get a sex change to learn that fact!
21 posted on
03/28/2007 9:40:29 AM PDT by
Cowboy Bob
(Liberalism is the most extreme form of dementia.)
To: stompk
Oh, puh-leeze. A name change or sex change doesn't wipe out debts.
Nice try, buddy. Now pay up.
23 posted on
03/28/2007 10:02:49 AM PDT by
steve-b
(It's hard to be religious when certain people don't get struck by lightning.)
To: stompk
When a guy gets divorced he usually ends up with at least three enemies,
His ex-wife, her attorney, and his own attorney.
Now he has an ex-husband instead of an ex-wife.
Weird!
27 posted on
03/28/2007 10:31:11 AM PDT by
FixitGuy
(By their fruits shall ye know them!)
30 posted on
03/28/2007 2:03:58 PM PDT by
little jeremiah
(Only those who thirst for truth can know truth.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson