Posted on 08/22/2007 7:28:41 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
MONTEBELLO, Quebec – President Bush today sidestepped a direct question about whether he'd be willing to categorically deny there is a plan to create the North American Union.
Instead, he ridiculed those who believe that is taking place as conspiracy theorists.
The exchange came at a news conference held by Bush, Mexico's President Felipe Calderon, and Canada's Prime Minister Stephen Harper, who met at a resort in the rural woods outside of Ottawa, Quebec, to discuss their latest work on the Security and Prosperity Partnership.
After the trio presented their prepared statement about the SPP, several reporters who had been selected in advance were allowed to ask questions.
When it came time for a question from a Fox News reporter, Bush was asked if he would be willing to categorically deny that there is a plan to create a North American Union, or that there are plans to create NAFTA Superhighways.
"As you three leaders meet here, there are a growing number of people in each of your countries who have expressed concern about the Security and Prosperity Partnership. This is addressed to all three of you. Can you say today that this is not a prelude to a North American Union, similar to a European Union? Are there plans to build some kind of superhighway connecting all three countries? And do you believe all of these theories about a possible erosion of national identity stem from a lack of transparency from this partnership?" was the question, according to a White House transcript.
Reporters at the news conference said he sidestepped, instead adopting the tactic that those who are arguing the European Union model of integrating nations into a larger continental union is being used in North America should be ridiculed.
(Excerpt) Read more at worldnetdaily.com ...
A straight answer would have been preferable to ridicule. Now the rumors won’t die.
“Now the rumors won’t die.”
Please point to ONE conspiracy theory that has EVER died.
oops. Thing = think
Conspiracy theories abound because conspiracies really happen. Not every theory turns out to be a real conspiracy, but some of them do.
OK, the World Nut Daily says he sidestepped the question. The Washington Times says he denied a union. Which one ya gonna believe?
They CAN'T die, because there are too many people behind them................
...and there are even conspiracies that don’t have rumors!!!
There is too much evidence that something is going on for it to die. A “North American Union”, maybe or maybe not. Certainly giant corporations are forming a “public private partnership” to loot the American (all three nations) people into spending on infrastructure and altering public policy (without the legislature’s involvement) that will benefit the giant companies first rather than the citizens first.
If they didn’t sneak around like cowards the conspiracy theorists would be proven wrong.
The aliens want to eventually have a one world union before the invasion. I fear for my great grand children.
‘’Racist Paranoids’’ - Jorge
I also noticed he didn’t deny that he’s the Anti-Christ.
So many pro-illegal, open borders Bushbots, so little time....
Timeline/Progress
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=VIV20061220&articleId=4216
Links to state legislative initiatives
OPPOSING THE NORTH AMERICAN UNION
As of 4/8/07
Alabama: Senate Resolution 30 - “Opposing any effort to implement a trinational political governmental entity among the United States, Canada, and Mexico; opposing the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America and initiatives pursued in conjunction with the partnership that threaten the sovereignty of the United States; opposing a North American Union; and opposing the North American Free Trade Agreement superhighway system.”
Go to the Alabama Legislative Information System Online
Arizona: Senate Concurrent Memorial 1002 - “Urging the Congress of the United States to withdraw the United States from the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America and any other bilateral or multilateral activity that seeks to create a North American Union.”
Bill status
Georgia: Senate Resolution 124 - “Urging the United States Congress to withdraw the United States from the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America and from any other bilateral or multilateral activity that seeks the economic merger of the United States with any other country; and for other purposes.”
Hawaii: Senate Resolution 60 and Senate Concurrent Resolution 96 - “Requesting the United States Congress and the Congressional Delegation from the state of Hawaii to us all their efforts, energies, and abilities to withdraw the United States from any further participation in the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America, and withdraw from and avoid participation in any other bilateral or multilateral activity that seeks to advance, authorize, fund, or in any way promote continental integration or the creation of a North American Union.”
Idaho: House Joint Memorial 5 - “Stating findings of the Legislature and urging Congress to use all efforts, energies and diligence to withdraw the United States from any further participation in the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America or any other bilateral or multilateral activity that seeks to advance, authorize, fund or in any way promote the creation of any structure to create any form of North American Union.”
Illinois:House Joint Resolution 29 - “Urges the U.S. Congress, and especially the legislative delegation to the U.S. Congress from the State of Illinois, to withdraw the U.S. from any further participation in the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America.”
Bill status
Missouri: Senate Concurrent Resolution 15 - “Urges Congress to withdraw the United States from any further participation in the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America and any other multilateral activity which seeks to advance the creation of the North America Union.”
House Concurrent Resolution 33 - “Urges Congress to use all of its efforts, energies, and diligence to withdraw the United States from any further participation in the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America.”
Montana:House Joint Resolution 25 - “A Joint Resolution of the Senate and the House of Representatives of the state of Montana opposing any effort to implement a trinational political, gvernmental entity among the United States, Canada, and Mexico; opposing the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America and initiatives prsued in conjunction with the partnership that threaten the sovereignty of the United States; opposing a North American Union; and opposing the North American Free Trade Agreement superhighway system”
Bill status
Oklahoma: Senate Concurrent Resolution 10 - “Urging the United States to withdraw from the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America and any other activity which seeks to create a North American Union; and directing distribution.”
Bill status: go to the Oklahoma Legislature “Bill Search Form” and enter “SCR 10” into the “Measure Number(s) window.
Oregon: Senate Joint Memorial 5 - “Urges Congress to withdraw United States from Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America and other activities that advance creation of North American Union.”
South Carolina: House Concurrent Resolution 3185 - “Requesting the Congress of the United States to withdraw the United States from the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America and any other activity that seeks to create a North American Union, and requesting the Congressional Delegation of South Carolina to work to withdraw the United States from the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America and any other activity that seeks to create a North American Union.”
If you have any problems with the above link, you can find bill at the SC legislature (enter search term “H 3185”)
South Dakota:Senate Concurrent Resolution 7 - “Urging that the United States withdraw from the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America and any other bilateral or multilateral activity that seeks to create a North American Union.”
Bill status
Tennessee: Senate Joint Resolution 0088 - “A Resolution relative to withdrawing the United States from the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America and from any other bilateral or multilateral activity that seeks the economic merger of the United States with any other country.”
Bill status: Go to the Tennessee Legislature website, click on “Legislation” and enter “SJR0088” into the “Bill Number to Look Up” window.
Utah: House Joint Resolution 7 - “Urging United States Withdrawal from Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America.”
Bill status
Virginia:Senate Joint Resolution 442 - “Memorializing the Congress to oppose implementation of the NAFTA Superhighway System and the creation of a North American Union. Calls on Congress to take such constitutional action as may be necessary to prevent the executive branch of the federal government from unilateral action in implementing the NAFTA Superhighway System and the creation of a North American Union.”
Also see: NAFTA Superhighway System and creation of North American Union; memorializing Congress to oppose implementation thereof. SJR 387
Washington: Senate Joint Memorial 8004 and House Joint Memorial 4018 - “Requesting the withdrawal of the United States from participation in the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America.”
H. CON. RES. 40
110th CONGRESS, 1st Session
Introduced January 22, 2007 in the House of Representatives
“Expressing the sense of Congress that the United States should not engage in the construction of a North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) Superhighway System or enter into a North American Union with Mexico and Canada.”
Bill sponsor:
Virgil H. Goode, Jr. [VA-5]
Co-sponsors:
Representatives:
Duncan, John J., Jr. [TN-2] - 1/22/07
Foxx, Virginia [NC-5] - 1/22/07
Jones, Walter B., Jr. [NC-3] - 1/22/07
Paul, Ron [TX-14] - 1/22/07
Stearns, Cliff [FL-6] - 1/22/07
Wamp, Zach [TN-3] - 1/22/07
Norwood, Charles W. [GA-10]-1/30/07
Saxton, Jim [NJ-3] - 2/8/07
Tiberi, Patrick J. [OH-12] - 2/8/07
Regula, Ralph [OH-16]-2/8/07
Cubin, Barbara [WY]-2/16/07
Tancredo, Thomas G. [CO-6]-2/16/07
Garrett, Scott [NJ-5] - 2/27/07
McCotter, Thaddeus G. [MI-11]-2/27/07
Davis, David [TN-1] - 3/1/07
Davis, Lincoln [TN-4] - 3/1/07
Bush’s answer was:
“We represent three great nations. We each respect each other’s sovereignty. You know, there are some who would like to frighten our fellow citizens into believing that relations between us are harmful for our respective peoples. I just believe they’re wrong. I believe it’s in our interest to trade; I believe it’s in our interest to dialogue; I believe it’s in our interest to work out common problems for the good of our people.
“And I’m amused by some of the speculation, some of the old – you can call them political scare tactics. If you’ve been in politics as long as I have, you get used to that kind of technique where you lay out a conspiracy and then force people to try to prove it doesn’t exist. That’s just the way some people operate. I’m here representing my nation. I feel strongly that the United States is a force for good, and I feel strongly that by working with our neighbors we can a stronger force for good.
“So I appreciate that question. I’m amused by the difference between what actually takes place in the meetings and what some are trying to say takes place. It’s quite comical, actually, when you realize the difference between reality and what some people are talking on TV about.”
So the answer is: “Maybe, maybe not. Wait to see what Clintoon II does”
Not so fast. Who would have thought a few years ago that Bush would have been pushing for a massive amnesty bill with open borders to Mexico?
One might recall how beginning in the 1960's, the John Birch Society was promoting the idea that a "master conspiracy" that included many of our top leaders was seeking to bring about a Communist world state. Long after the Soviet empire collapsed, the "Master conspiracy" theory lives on among true-believing Birchers.
“They CAN’T die, because there are too many people behind them...”
Well, you have a point there.
“So many pro-illegal, open borders Bushbots, so little time....”
Oh, and it doesn’t go without notice that many of those same freepers are also Fredheads.
I’d be a lot more comfortable if we reverted to English units. The rest of the world would have to retool.
“Conspiracy theories abound because conspiracies really happen. Not every theory turns out to be a real conspiracy, but some of them do.”
Well said. Thank you.
You go girl! It’s not a conspiracy, it’s a movement!
Now we’re in the mocking and ridicule stage. Down the line when it’s being implemented, the people who oppose it will be labeled as “traitors”.
It’s a CONSPIRACY, I tell ya!...............
Just like that amnesty bill.
Hilliary Care - that conspiracy was killed because it was exposed. Lawsuits were won against the participants, for failure to comply with the “sunshine” laws, I believe.
Nobody worries about it anymore - BTW the people who uncovered that conspiracy were ridiculed as well.
A few years ago bush mocked and ridiculed anyone who was concerned about
the invasion of this nation by Illegal Aliens calling them "vigilantes".Now bush mocks and ridicules anyone concerned about supranational unions
as conspiracy theorists.We know now that this country has been invaded by over ten million
members of AZTLAN, MEChA and MS-13 murdering more Americans than those lost in IraqWhat does that say about his statement about the destruction of this Republic
and the creation of the North American Union?
The Washington Times sees it differently:
http://washingtontimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070822/NATION/108220071/1001
I would put more stock on the Washington Times’ reporting that World Net Daily.
The President called it a conspiracy and seemed adamant as did the others, there are no such plans for the highway or any highway. I will be looking up to see who is behind the map and story which is old.
No, he’s pointing out the TRUTH...which is that conspiracy theorists need something to distract them from living in their mothers’ basements once in a while, so they invent conspiracies.
“Pay attention to who they’re supporting for president.”
No coincidence or surprise there!
Look at Hillary Clinton. She's made many commie statements in the past and still continues to do so.
Look up the word sophistry...you’ll find your arguement there.
I too can link a lot of semi related nonesense to try and prove a point...it’s a game the whole family can play.
The NAU is a conspiracy theory often sowed in this forum by individuals whose goals are more than just a tad bit questionable...so...hey...let’s drink more Kool Aid and distrust everyone.
Your ability to use sweeping generalizations and other rhetoricle devices is quite good.
Thanks,
Bushbot (for the record I am not pro-illegal, but pro-reasonable legal immigration. I differ with the POTUS on some issues....but I am not a one issue parrot like some.)
I noticed that no one asked him if he was. Tell me, why do you think he didn't just say no? 
I watched Bush last night on Fox. He’s pulling the same stunt as he did with the amnesty bill. When he starts to name call his base, you lnow he’s up to something.
I’ve stopped trusting Bush after that amnesty fiasco.
And the wizard said to Dorothy “Ignore the man behind the curtain”.
“...corporations are not doing this - the federal government is...”
Who is the federal government? Corporations have been the prime suspect in forcing the illegal immigration issue out of the public eye for so many years and otherwise the biggest lobby for non enforcement of our laws. The political correctness and multicultural movement of the left has been their handmaiden.
Bingo...and this thread is like bait to the right’s tinfoil crowd.
“I differ with the POTUS on some issues....but I am not a one issue parrot like some.”
If we lose the sovereignty and security of our country, there are no other issues.
Bingo...and this thread is like bait to the right’s tinfoil crowd
///////////
sounds like you
re ready to press 2 for english.
Please point to ONE conspiracy theory that has EVER died.
/////////////////
The very real problem here is that americans die every day at the hands of illegals.
If he had clearly denied it would you have believed him?
sounds like everyone speaks english in your neighborhood.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
