Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/23/2007 11:14:02 AM PST by llevrok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
To: llevrok
Cool!

Jesse Jackson as Secretary of State.

Al Sharpton Sectratary of the Treasury.

2 posted on 12/23/2007 11:15:57 AM PST by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: llevrok

I don’t care if they are pick or purple. Let’s focus on the idea being presented.


3 posted on 12/23/2007 11:21:33 AM PST by PeterPrinciple ( Seeking the truth here folks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: llevrok

It wouldn’t be the black part that bother me it would be the Muslim part..I guess there wpould be lots of Christians beheaded since I for one will not denounce God for the pervert Mohammad.. Maybe I should worry about the black part since the whole country will go like Washington with mayors on drugs and cities rioting all the time..


4 posted on 12/23/2007 11:22:01 AM PST by PLD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: llevrok
I personally don't care if a candidate is green, yellow, red, black, white, brown, purple, male, female, transgendered, or no gender.

Are they honorable? Are they patriotic? Are they a conservative? Do they hold true to their core values?

I would vote for a mohawk wearing, green-haired, nose ring sporting transgendered black person in a tutu if they have a solid history of supporting a pro-life, pro-gun, pro-military, small government, pro-American sovereignty (in all it's aspects), TRUE equality for all agenda.

In short, it is the content of one's character, not the color of their skin, that makes the difference.

6 posted on 12/23/2007 11:25:34 AM PST by TheWriterTX (Proud Retrosexual Wife of 14 Years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: llevrok

Yeah; we need more Alcee Hastings, William Jeffersons, Cynthia McKineys, Sheila Jackson Lees, etc. to clean up Washington.......


9 posted on 12/23/2007 11:33:52 AM PST by traditional1 (Thompson/Hunter '08 OR Hunter/Thompson '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: llevrok
Obama is a politician. If he gets elected he will do what he has to do to get reelected.

Jackson and Sharpton have not endorsed Obama and won’t until they are sure he will win the nomination.

10 posted on 12/23/2007 11:38:17 AM PST by Brad from Tennessee ("A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: llevrok

What you’re really saying is that between H. KKKlintler with 51% negatives and Obama, the rats really have their work cut out for them one way or other.


11 posted on 12/23/2007 11:47:20 AM PST by damondonion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: llevrok

Aside from this thread being racist, pure and simple, they will have to hire experience and that means by experience not race.


13 posted on 12/23/2007 11:50:26 AM PST by RightWhale (Dean Koonz is good, but my favorite authors are Dun and Bradstreet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: llevrok
America is already governed by a blaggard government thanks to the 2006 election cycle.

For all the Dimbulbs and folks from Rio Linda:

Blaggard: A person of dubious morals, sometimes with villainous intent and suspicious plots.

More often than not in cahoots with other shady characters.

Ding Harry and Her majesty Pelosi!

14 posted on 12/23/2007 11:52:09 AM PST by Young Werther (Julius Caesar (Quae Cum Ita Sunt. Since these things are so.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: llevrok

If Obama knows what’s good for him, he will wear his faux blackness and faux Chirstianity as a figleaf until the election and then do what his chief sponsor, George Soros, tells him to do afterward.


17 posted on 12/23/2007 11:58:23 AM PST by Vigilanteman (Are there any men left in Washington? Or are there only cowards? Ahmad Shah Massoud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: llevrok

Like Ray Nagins magnificent Chocolate City? Awesome! The large Robert Byrd wing of the democrat party will destroy Obama. They are going with Edwards.


18 posted on 12/23/2007 11:59:22 AM PST by Ron in Acreage (Thinking of new tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: llevrok
It’s not the color of Obama’s skin, its the color of his politics. If Mr. Steele won the nomination on the Republican side, I could care less who he put in his cabinet, because I trust his judgment, not his skin color.
19 posted on 12/23/2007 12:01:16 PM PST by HisKingdomWillAbolishSinDeath (Christ's Kingdom on Earth is the answer. What is your question?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: llevrok

I like Condi Rice. Why do you ask? You know it isn’t about the color of their skin....


25 posted on 12/23/2007 12:12:37 PM PST by Drango (A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: llevrok

George Clinton: National Endowment of the Arts director.


29 posted on 12/23/2007 12:22:02 PM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Congratulations Brett Favre! All-time NFL leader in career passing yards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: llevrok
We didn't get an Irish Catholic cabinet when Kennedy was elected.

Most of us would say that we didn't get an evangelical cabinet when Bush was elected, though some Democrats will disagree.

So why would we get an African-American cabinet if Obama is elected?

Probably some Clark Clifford or Harold Ickes type would help Obama pick out his cabinet.

Obama is pretty well in touch with his inner White guy, isn't he?

There probably will be some "backlash" against the administration. There always is, sooner or later. But will it really affect all African-Americans?

My first response was to say no.

If Barack turns out to be a ditherer you may see a bit fewer stereotypes of Blacks in the media -- fewer feisty black women judges, etc -- but that's about it.

But on reflection I don't know. Politics can be pretty brutal, and there's always a lunatic fringe out there.

30 posted on 12/23/2007 12:36:26 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: llevrok
Black government ... hmmmm maybe but doubtfully

Inexperienced airheaded STINKIN liberal pandering black man just because he is black ... what do you think? I know I know I'm a racist for saying it ... excuse me while I PUKE

31 posted on 12/23/2007 12:41:46 PM PST by clamper1797 (Fred Thompson - Duncan Hunter for POTUS and Vice Potus in either order)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: llevrok

What a racist remark....it would be a BLACK President....not a BLACK GOVERNMENT.


33 posted on 12/23/2007 12:49:41 PM PST by Ann Archy (Abortion: The Human Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: llevrok

Well, I think we could look to the large cities who have elected black mayor’s for that answer. Furthermore, we have a so called conservative candidate whose qualification is former Mayor. What will his government look like?


35 posted on 12/23/2007 12:52:39 PM PST by Snoopers-868th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: llevrok

The problem would be how would he deal with I Slam governments given that he’s a follower of the Religion of Pieces....regardless of any statements to the contrary.


36 posted on 12/23/2007 1:16:40 PM PST by Gay State Conservative (Wanna see how bad it can get? Elect Hillary and find out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: llevrok

I’ve been pondering that very question all day and have yet to come up with an answer. Yea, it’ll be entirely different but the real question, which you’ve honed in on is how is the Anglo/European-American population going to handle it. After a great deal of thougt, I’ve pretty much concluded that the vast majority, (60+%) won’t respond in any form because 1) most are too busy making/spending money having been propagandized into endless, pointless work/consumption cycle and because 2) they’ve had it beaten into their heads that to respond in any form, i.e. to open their mouths, is to be “racist”; they’ll never say much of anything.

Another way to look at this question is to ask how will the Blacks respond? I don’t think we’ll see anything outrageous there unless there’s an obvious and drastic drop in support for the gov’t on the part of the Anglo/European American population, which I don’t think we’ll see unless there’s dramatic and drastic change initiated by Obama.

There in lies the real heart of the matter, what will Obama do? If he goes radical anti-white with Reparations, etc., we’re going to see major problems. I have to believe that notwithstanding the awsome dead cat bounce response you get out of the white’s on most stuff, that if he comes after their money and property there will be problems.


38 posted on 12/23/2007 2:03:06 PM PST by glide625
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson