To: wendy1946
Ive seen several kinds of electric-gravity and expanding Earth theories to explain the larger dinosaurs. One thing I havent seen however is any sort of a theory to explain ancients building with stones too heavy for any technology, ancient or modern either one, to move. There are a couple of temple column stones like that in Baalbek Lebanon, and then what they call geoglyphs in Peru which amount to walls or something or other made with 200-ton fitted stones. Those things require reduced gravity as well? If attenuated gravity existed beyond the dinosaurs into human historic times, then yes, reduced gravity might help explain those monolithic stones. Mythology gives us some hints that it may have.
279 posted on
04/06/2008 9:33:38 PM PDT by
Swordmaker
(Remember, the proper pronunciation of IE is "AAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE!)
To: Swordmaker
There’s a guy building a full size replica of Stonehenge with his own muscle power. Exactly why is something as absurd as reduced gravity invoked to explain something that doesn’t require a remarkable explanation?
And why is Ted Holden back under a new user name?
281 posted on
04/07/2008 8:18:43 AM PDT by
js1138
To: Swordmaker
282 posted on
04/07/2008 11:21:07 AM PDT by
js1138
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson