No. It started out on this thread that the people at SciAm who wrote this piece on the Expelled movie, also have embraced gobul warming.
I find it odd that those who wish to treat a group of people, believers, as idiots and yet point to a magazine that is not scientific in the various positions it holds to.
To say that all evo’s are also environuts is not valid. But for those who wish to hold this article up, written by a recognized science magazine as some sort of proof of scientific validity, well, that’s sad.
It was more of a comparison.
I also find it odd that in general, the attitude of evo’s tends to be that the creationists are the problem when it comes to science education. I feel that the environuts are the real problem. There policies will kill people. The debate about origins does not. Nor does the debate about origins lead to policies that hurt our economy, or starve people. Gobul warming is a very dangerous creed that kills.
Evolution proponents generally don't have a quarrel with creationists. We only have a problem with ID proponents attempting to distort the methods of science in order to force it to accommodate something distinctly non-scientific. That’s explained pretty well in the Talk Design FAQ, starting with the 3rd one down.
I don’t know which is worse, global warming activists politicising scientific results or of ID activists distorting scientific methods, but one does not negate the effects of the other.