Smite the eco-blasphemers!
Yep - the message can’t be right if it comes from conservatives, dontcha know.
And 9 out of 10 pro-global warming books can be traced to think tanks sponsored by carbon traders, first by Enron in days of yore, now with the likes of Goldman Sachs.
Yup, I'm sure going to be swayed by a study from a 'team' made up of that group.
I'll run to the "Political scientists" (there's an oxymoron for you), and sociologists every time... Published in the esteemed "Journal of Environmental Politics" no less...
And the ones in the 1970s already have proven to be correct. Any bets on whether those numbers will change? Already we're seeing the Gorebots change their mantra of "Gore-bal Warming!" to one of "Climate Change!"
Coldest May in 16 Years; 4th Coldest of last 30 years
And this:
Wow - Snow forecast for Olympics, North Cascades (Global Warming Alert)
The mainstream experts agree on warming and that CO2 has a mild warming effect. The mainstream experts do not agree on catastrophic warming (with any scientific probability)
I see you are a man causing global warming believer from that socialist state of Maryland. Explain how the world has gone through numerous ice ages and warmings when there were no SUV’s or factories to blame on the warming and cooling. Also explain why this year was one of the coldest in 100 years for China if CO2 is the culprit. Given the increase in CO2 emmissions in China should it not have gotten warmer?
AGW ... even merely Catastrophic Climate Change (hot OR cold), if you wish ...
is a main socio-political battlefront, and must not be trivialized.
This “study” finds that Sceptics are birds of a feather. Whoop-de-doo!
As if Alarmists are not.
The point is NOT, who published your book ... the point must be,
Is Your Book True?
Explain why the hockey-stick chart is not a fraud !
Explain how the surface of the earth today measures cooler than it was 10 years ago !
Explain why anyone should believe a set of computer models
... whose projections are clearly out of line with observations ...
rather than act on the observations !