But it wasn’t his contention just that iron was present but that iron predominates and is the major source of the sun’s energy........obviously wrong.
Manuel also claimed that the sun was a past supernova but astronomers say supernovas do not become objects like our sun.
Manuel writes rubbish. He’s like someone writing about the exact floor plan of a flying saucer.
Manuel writes rubbish. He's like someone writing about the exact floor plan of a flying saucer.You really don't like him, obviously, that's (at least) the second ad hominem attack you've made on him.
Manuel also claimed that the sun was a past supernova but astronomers say supernovas do not become objects like our sun.Science is a method, not a body of knowledge. If everything were known with absolute certainty, if knowledge were complete, there would be no need to continue to find things out using the scientific method. Manuel et al have used data that others have ignored or been baffled by to construct a theory.
But it wasn't his contention just that iron was present but that iron predominates and is the major source of the sun's energy........obviously wrong.Why obviously wrong? Because you say so? You've also stated that iron can't be in the Sun because of the temperature. I guess the Earth can't have iron in its core, and all those old lava floes are entirely iron-free. And since hydrogen remains a gas until it gets near absolute zero, obviously conditions in the Sun are far too hot for hydrogen as well.