Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Karma At The Weekend B.O. (Another Spike Lee bomb?)
dirtyharrysplace.com ^ | September 28th, 2008 | Dirty Harry

Posted on 09/29/2008 8:01:07 AM PDT by Publius804

Karma At The Weekend B.O.

Posted by Dirty Harry on Sunday, September 28th, 2008

Spike Lee’s Miracle At St. Anna:

There have been few films I wanted to see flop more than Spike Lee’s Miracle At St. Anna, and flop it has taking in a humiliating $3.2 million. I’ll see and review it in the coming days, but regardless of how good or bad it is, race-baiting to promote a film needs to forever be rewarded just like this.

Tim Robbins’ The Lucky Ones:

Kyle Smith: “The Friday night box office figures are in and it appears that the latest Iraq War flop “The Lucky Ones” (seem my review below) is going to be distinguished by an even more gargantuan lack of interest than most films in this stillborn genre: the first estimates are that it sold $118 worth of ticket per screen on its opening day. At $10 a ticket, that’s 12 tickets per screen.”

The Christian based Fireproof:

Nikki Finke: “A surprise was the 4th place debut of Provident/Samuel Goldwyn’s Fireproof which debuted to a $2.3M Friday and $2.6M Saturday for a $6.4M weekend though released into only 839 dates. The reason why is that the studio targeted Christian audiences to push the PG-13 film starring the grown-up TV child star Kirk Cameron. “Just between you and me, keep your eye on the Fireproof per screen averages this weekend,” a Grace Hill Media source tipped me. “On Sunday, I think there will be some distribution execs around town who will be asking ‘What the hell is Fireproof?’”

Gotta love it.

(Excerpt) Read more at dirtyharrysplace.com ...


TOPICS: TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: fireproof; spikelee; theluckyones
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 09/29/2008 8:01:08 AM PDT by Publius804
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Publius804

Good to hear that and that Ebert’s review had no impact on the turnout. F’ em both....


2 posted on 09/29/2008 8:04:21 AM PDT by Doug TX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius804

I saw Fireproof this weekend and it is GREAT!!!

GO SEE FIREPROOF!!! You will not be disapointed.


3 posted on 09/29/2008 8:04:25 AM PDT by BobinIL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius804

No such thing as Karma. But it is good to see the “spike” Lee is worthless even to Hollywood.


4 posted on 09/29/2008 8:05:16 AM PDT by Porterville (Im no economist- getting a PHD in economics wasn't economical... it didn' make cents.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius804

There is still way too much money in our economy if Spike Lee and Oliver Stone can find continue to find investors for their flops.


5 posted on 09/29/2008 8:07:53 AM PDT by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doug TX

Yes.

Roger Ebert is a HUGE (literally AND figuratively) far-left SHILL.

The more he “likes” a movie the less likely I am to go see it.


6 posted on 09/29/2008 8:08:12 AM PDT by WayneS (Vote Obama bin Biden 2008 - "Because the world doesn't suck enough yet".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Publius804
Tim Robbins’ The Lucky Ones:

the first estimates are that it sold $118 worth of ticket per screen on its opening day. At $10 a ticket, that’s 12 tickets per screen

Heh heh.

7 posted on 09/29/2008 8:13:23 AM PDT by T. Buzzard Trueblood ("It would be disgrace and humiliation if Obama does not win." -Woody Allen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: T. Buzzard Trueblood

The sick thing is that Hollywood will continue funding these losers after batting 0 for 10 and losing millions for the studios.

These films will go straight to the Sundance Channel and fade off into obscurity.


8 posted on 09/29/2008 8:20:58 AM PDT by Moorka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Publius804
FIREPROOF cost $500K to produce and took in $6.5 million.

Spike's disaster cost $45 million to produce and took in $3 million.

Hollywood rule of thumb is that a picture must do 250% of production cost just to break even. Spike has a long way to go.

9 posted on 09/29/2008 8:25:43 AM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get back down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Moorka

You’re right, Hollywood will continue to fund these types of films. And the Hollywood crowd, rather than recogizing their mistakes will blame it on things such as; the bad economy where people can’t afford to go see movies, the average movie-goer isn’t sophisticated enough to “understand” their movie, they’re ahead of their time and the movies will end up being classics such as “Citizen Kane” ... etc.


10 posted on 09/29/2008 8:28:47 AM PDT by Jackson57
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: wtc911

Why the long face,Spike?


11 posted on 09/29/2008 8:41:04 AM PDT by Dr. Ursus (( commander of the simian host))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Publius804

3.2 mil, can you be series? LOL


12 posted on 09/29/2008 8:41:52 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Publius804

Good to know that Spike “the IRS Cheat” Lee is continuing to lose money on his race-based films.

Maybe that’s why there isn’t any audience for them, Spike! People want to see a good story, not pay for a lecture from a racist about racism.

Speaking of Hollywood losers, whatever became of Michael “I’m fatter than Roseanne Arnold” Moore?


13 posted on 09/29/2008 8:46:22 AM PDT by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kittymyrib
There is still way too much money in our economy if Spike Lee and Oliver Stone can find continue to find investors for their flops.

They must have hired Bialystock and Bloom.

14 posted on 09/29/2008 8:49:55 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Publius804

Spike Lee’s films never have made money. Nor gotten awards. But, this might be one of those films that nobody ever saw and still gets a few nods this coming awards season. Can’t stand the racist.


15 posted on 09/29/2008 8:54:39 AM PDT by My Favorite Headache (Forget the 3AM phone call. Obama can not even answer the phone at 3PM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My Favorite Headache

Just think of it as affirmative action in action.


16 posted on 09/29/2008 9:07:19 AM PDT by Noumenon (Time for Atlas to shrug - and to pick up a gun)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Publius804

Spike Lee is one of the most overrated directors in the history of filmmaking. Saying that Spike Lee is a great director is like saying that Jennifer Lopez (or Ben Affleck - take your pick) is a great actress.


17 posted on 09/29/2008 9:14:10 AM PDT by Sicon ("All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others." - G. Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wtc911
$45 million minus $3 million is $42 million. That's a lot of take out food, wages, etc. So what we have is investors with too much good money and bad taste transferring their wealth to the working class.
Bad part is it's being done to dig holes and refill them in imitation of productive work.
Next time maybe the investors can just send checks to the working stiffs and we all can be spared the dozens of ads for “SPIKES LEE'S GREATEST, MONUMENTAL...” all day long.
not gonna happen...siiigh.
18 posted on 09/29/2008 9:25:25 AM PDT by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: count-your-change
Lee's films are funded by studios who get their funding primarily from hedge funds which are now closing up shop.

DeutscheBank and Goldman have both shut down their film funds. That translates to significantly fewer films for the next few years.

19 posted on 09/29/2008 9:42:41 AM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get back down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Publius804
I guess Spike isn't listening to Louis Farrrakhan these days.

Wouldn't it have been BETTER to open this on september 19TH?

20 posted on 09/29/2008 10:31:09 AM PDT by weegee (Obama's a uniter?"I want you to argue with them (friends,neighbors,Republicans) & get in their face")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson