Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

This article only examines and compares work results of Dr. Walter C. McCrone and Dr John Heller and Dr. Alan Adler. He does not delve into the results of Raymond N. Rogers work invalidating the C14 tests of 1988 or Rogers work identifying the chemical composition of the image forming coating on the Shroud's fibers.

This is an excellent, well written and well researched presentation on those limited areas. Mostly it revolves around McCrone's claim that the image and blood stains are paint and Heller's and Adler's claims that the the image and blood stains are not paint, and specifically identifying the blood stains as the exudates of real blood.

1 posted on 10/06/2008 12:41:32 AM PDT by Swordmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Swordmaker

Thanks for the synopsis


2 posted on 10/06/2008 12:44:14 AM PDT by valkyry1 (McCain/Palin 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alamo-Girl; albee; AnalogReigns; AnAmericanMother; Angelas; AniGrrl; annyokie; Aquinasfan; ...
One of the scientific papers presented at August's Shroud conference in Ohio. It is an excellent comparison of the work of Walter McCrone and the team of John Heller and Alan Adler in analyzing the Shroud of Turin. PING!

If you want on or off the Shroud of Turin Ping List, Freepmail me.


3 posted on 10/06/2008 12:44:52 AM PDT by Swordmaker (Remember, the proper pronunciation of IE is "AAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson