Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Joint CHP-Marine Corps Checkpoint Raises Suspicions
KESQ ^ | Dec. 16, 2008 | Nathan Baca

Posted on 12/19/2008 2:10:53 PM PST by decimon

he California Highway Patrol in the High Desert and the Twentynine Palms Marine Base are receiving dozens of calls complaining about a controversial DUI checkpoint. Military Police joined the CHP for a recent checkpoint in Yucca Valley.

(Excerpt) Read more at kesq.com ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Military/Veterans
KEYWORDS: martiallaw; paranoid; possecomitatus; tinfoil; training
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: Blackhawk

>>>>>Only if it was in ‘77. Then maybe could be. Loved the watches at the Club carding and breaking up fights<<<<<

I was there in 75/76, at the A School barracks but made it to the enlisted club only once because I couldn’t stand to drink that so-called “beer”. Some Filipino or VN chick ran a bar over the hill at OB and so that’s where we’d go instead.

Loved SD, I was there almost 6 months and it rained maybe 3 times. Maybe 1. Amazingly there was a snow flurry for about 10 minutes one day.


41 posted on 12/19/2008 3:42:48 PM PST by angkor (Conservatism is not a religious movement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Blackhawk

BTW, NTC San Diego had a little sailing club with a bunch of small skiffs you could rent and sail out in the harbor (after you qualified). Very nice, I spent many an afternoon there.


42 posted on 12/19/2008 3:46:11 PM PST by angkor (Conservatism is not a religious movement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: 444Flyer
What's wrong with just using MP’s?

From your link: "Limitations on growing the active duty force have resulted in the hiring of civilians to provide Security and Law Enforcement services across the Department of Defense."

Looks like the are limits on numbers of enlisted personnel but not civilian hires.

43 posted on 12/19/2008 4:03:43 PM PST by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: 444Flyer
What happens when this “civilian force” is called off base and must deal with civilians rather than military personnel?

As employees of the DoD, I think they would have no authority over civilians.

44 posted on 12/19/2008 4:06:45 PM PST by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: SECURE AMERICA
Me as well...as an MP (5811 MOS in the Corps) I worked Town Patrol in wonderful Jacksonville, NC outside of Camp LeJeune along with local PD when Court Street was a big stripper hot spot (Tough Duty) and did a Fourth of July weekend assignment with the Myrtle Beach PD around 1984 or 85 I think.

Civilian cops would ID them and when the green Military ID was produced, we went hands on and arranged transport back to their unit. It did save the local PD alot of jail space and paperwork

I actually got my first Letter of Commendation from the Base Commander for that assignment...having girls in bikinis throwing hotel keys at me...should have gotten haz duty pay too, I guess.

45 posted on 12/19/2008 4:16:21 PM PST by IrishPennant (Patriotism is strongest when accompanied by bad politics, loyal FRiends and great whiskey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: ansel12
Back in the day I remember that; but it was clear that they had no authority over civilians.
46 posted on 12/19/2008 4:18:59 PM PST by mad_as_he$$ (Nemo me impune lacessit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: decimon

Yes its a detail for the Navy version of MP’s called Master at Arms.


47 posted on 12/19/2008 4:19:02 PM PST by Nebr FAL owner (.308 reach out & thump someone .50 cal.Browning Machine gun reach out & crush someone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 444Flyer
What's wrong with just using MP’s? They are bringing in civilians alongside the MP’s on base. Wouldn't there be a conflict of interests between those being the civilian force and the Marine’s own MPs? Whom answers to whom I wonder. What jurisdiction does the Civy force answer to? What happens when this “civilian force” is called off base and must deal with civilians rather than military personnel? What other purposes could a specialized force of 1200+ civilian officers who have been trained alongside the Marines serve outside of serving on bases? Lots of questions...(especially with Obama coming into play in a month).

Just over complicating it here - simply an agreement here b/n the local PD and base MP's to take military persons off their hands when identified. MP's do not go hands on with civilians unless they buck the cops and fight - and then they back them up as any passing civilian should do.

48 posted on 12/19/2008 4:24:45 PM PST by IrishPennant (Patriotism is strongest when accompanied by bad politics, loyal FRiends and great whiskey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: decimon

Military doing civilian police duty? Is that constitutional?


49 posted on 12/19/2008 4:35:39 PM PST by meyer (We are all John Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishPennant
...simply an agreement here b/n the local PD and base MP's...

In the link the Corps is hiring civilian cops to be employees of the Corps.

50 posted on 12/19/2008 4:35:50 PM PST by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: meyer
Military doing civilian police duty? Is that constitutional?

The MPs were apparently just observing but that was enough to alarm some civilians. I don't think I'd like it.

51 posted on 12/19/2008 4:37:57 PM PST by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: truth_seeker

Two issues usually arise which enforce the Posse Comitatus Act.

1) Jurisdiction of law enforcement.
2) Military Support to Civilian Authority and source funding.

If local law enforcement is supplemented by military personnel, enormous efforts must be made in the judicial side of the house to handle those who are improperly arrested or how to handle evidence obtained without due process. Additionally, even if some local law enforcement officer declares by his personal edict that military law is in place, the long arm of the law (judicial branch) has time on its side to deal with determining the legitimacy of the situation.

Unlike civilian law enforcement, during the Long War, many military personnel are being assigned military police functions without much more than a HS Diploma, physical training, and boot camp for training. They aren’t undergoing training such as a police academy or review of state law or even the traffic codes. They understand immediate obedience to orders and in some situations serve as manpower where presence is beneficial to the civilian authorities.

The second issue regarding MSCA in Military Operations Other Than War, has numerous constraints placed on local commanders regarding timely reporting and gaining appropriate authority from the local chain of command through the State, through the Governor to the Federal Government, then through to the DoD. Throughout that myriad of required reporting and requests for authority, there are numerous branch points where other public service and nongovernmental organizations might be better solutions than the military.

At the end of it all, somebody has to account for the defense expenditures for the operations conducted in support of civilian authority.

Despite Hollywood SciFi and Cold War rhetoric when Army Navy Surplus was more abundant, the US military is hardly equipped to either supplement or replace civilian mechanisms of operations, commerce, utilities, and infrastructure. At best, a major percentage of US military resources at the Division level might be able to sustain a relatively small town of 10,000-50,000 provided the rest of the nation was supporting it.

Generally speaking, the DoD frequently is at odds with local and state utility companies for operating the military utility infrastructure, even with civilian government service and outsourced skilled personnel. The Government basically got out of operating utility companies with deregulation, although they operate many of their own district plants supporting existing operations.

One of the easist ways to spot BS in military public affairs is when a battalion to divisional command makes extravagant claims of going into a war zone and is establishing infrastructure which never previously existed for city populations and country regions.

Those efforts took decades in the US when we had economic dominance and a large industrial base, consuming a major portion of our expendable income on those efforts, with widely decentralized parallel construction efforts in a free market economy.

FWIW, the military MPs frequently are so understaffed that WYSIWYG. They probably were simply observing during a training period prior to deployment or as temp personnel without sufficient funds for more extensive training in a documented training curriculum (ie OJT as observers). Since a lot of deployed Marines have developed driving habits in war zones, to not stop for anything, we’re probably having a larger number of drunk driving/sleepiness, and unsafe driving practices claim many more friendlies upon return stateside than overseas, not counting improvised munitions.


52 posted on 12/19/2008 4:38:01 PM PST by Cvengr (Adversity in life and death is inevitable. Thru faith in Christ, stress is optional.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: decimon
SmileyCentral.com
53 posted on 12/19/2008 4:40:00 PM PST by verity ("Lord, what fools we mortals be!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: verity

That was succinct.


54 posted on 12/19/2008 4:44:13 PM PST by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: decimon

Yeah - there are DoD cops now on many reservations to supplement law enforcement, as well as contract private security to do access control, etc. Internal security is being contracted out too...I have an Army buddy at JSOC HQ Fort Bragg who tells me their access control to this sensitive area has been contracted out to private security for years.


55 posted on 12/19/2008 4:45:48 PM PST by IrishPennant (Patriotism is strongest when accompanied by bad politics, loyal FRiends and great whiskey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: decimon
Now you'll have Erik Estrada all worked up.

That brings about a mental image that is NOT pleasant...

56 posted on 12/19/2008 4:46:53 PM PST by meyer (We are all John Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: meyer
Now you'll have Erik Estrada all worked up.

That brings about a mental image that is NOT pleasant...

Okay, Robert Blake.

57 posted on 12/19/2008 4:55:25 PM PST by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: decimon

I think it’s great, the check points are impounding about 40+ cars of illegals without drivers licenses every time the have one.

Now all we have to do is get the cops in these sanctuary cities to arrest and deport them.

They are going to have another ine in Oceanside tonight.


58 posted on 12/19/2008 5:01:09 PM PST by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: decimon
Okay, Robert Blake.

And you can take Dat to Da Bank...

59 posted on 12/19/2008 5:04:48 PM PST by meyer (We are all John Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: meyer

60 posted on 12/19/2008 5:16:24 PM PST by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson