Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SFR

At this stage of the game, I’d trust the professionalism of the Marines over the police when it comes to checkpoints.

That being said, I take a dim view of local police allowing Marines to observe a checkpoint. It’s fine line too easily crossed when it comes to Posse Comitatus and the military being directly involved with civilian law enforcement.

The cops say they invited the Marines. What I’d like to know is why the Marines didn’t invite the police on base to give them pointers when it comes to field sobriety tests?


8 posted on 12/19/2008 2:20:54 PM PST by stylin_geek (Liberalism: comparable to a chicken with its head cut off, but with more spastic motions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: stylin_geek
hat I’d like to know is why the Marines didn’t invite the police on base to give them pointers when it comes to field sobriety tests?

It is easy to just get pointers, what they are probably observing is how people react at checkpoints. You can't just describe nonverbal queues and many you really can't fake. It is a term we use a lot called 'Educhaos', learning through the 'chaos' of real life. People react in unexpected ways that you can't put in a book or just describe, but you need to physically observe.

12 posted on 12/19/2008 2:23:17 PM PST by mnehring (Happy Holy-Days!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: All

I can say from experience that MPs couldn’t arrest civilians even at the Pentagon. If attacked, they could noggin-knot them with nightsticks but not arrest them. US Marshals were there for that. This was in 1967.


14 posted on 12/19/2008 2:24:55 PM PST by decimon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson