Posted on 01/02/2009 1:16:10 PM PST by patriot08
Ed Hale of Plains Radio has secured a copy of the Dunham/Obama divorce decree as promised. He has registered this at the courthouse and has turned the document over to lawyers who are reported to be happy and enthused over the contents.
This is the first page. This is all that can be divulged at this time as those who have seen the decree are sworn to silence. You may hear information about it tonight on Ed's plainsradio show.
The flaw with that argument is that the black out is not on the original, it is on an image of the document. The original document is not altered. If the lawyer doesn't even address that, I would question his judgment. That is one of the most elementary mistakes some have had with the COLB conspiracy.
That's because no past president had his past so tightly sealed from public scrutiny. All past presidents had long-time family friends to vouch for the credibility of the family and candidate. Most presidential candidates had their family past very well documented, because they came from public families.
It's only Obama who has locked up all his childhood records, has no past friendships that he's willing to admit to, had no family that he allowed to talk to the press.
-PJ
Yeah, the attorney must have read FreeRepublic—what three months ago?
The P.I. should refund the money.
Do you know if it is standard to attach a copy of a birth certificate to divorce documents if one parent is filing for custody?
Maybe there was a copy attached
I am not sure of the process but what you say makes sense to me. I am interested in following up with this EdHale stuff but am keeping an equally skeptical take on it as well. No smoking gun as of yet.
You don't know how happy I would be if that happens, I will gladly eat crow but I am not looking up recipes. This whole thing just sounds so much like all the documents that have been “uncovered” about UFOs, Bush etc etc. Also, I still believe that the Clinton mafia would have uncovered this LONG AGO
The mere registering of the birth of a baby with the Dept. of Vital Stats, even if it was a home birth, would generate a birth announcement in both papers. The announcement appeared in “The Honolulu Advertiser” on Sunday, August 13,1961 and in “The Star Bulletin” on Wednesday, August 16, 1961. The problem with the announcement is the address which was used. The home at that address was owned by Orland Scott and Thelma Lefforge Young.
The attorney is basically reviewing all of the information that we already know about Obama’s life ...
You’re slamming some long-standing and upstanding conservative freepers.
This whole Ed Hale drama *does* sound much like the API “wait until next week”, “wait until next week” game.
How?
If she had NOT registered the child’s birth with nearest US Embassy would the Port of Entry register the birth?
Is it Mrs, Leading or Miss,Leading?
My, how defensive we are.
No, you don’t sound guilty of that.
He needs more money to find out.
How about the President who was born in Canada? Did he have to produce a birth certificate?
—
Oh..., I forgot to ask, “How come he was President?”
It has been debunked that Arthur was born in Canada
Hey pal, the ball is in your court, not mine.
Projecting again?
That’s because no past president had his past so tightly sealed from public scrutiny. All past presidents had long-time family friends to vouch for the credibility of the family and candidate. Most presidential candidates had their family past very well documented, because they came from public families.
It’s only Obama who has locked up all his childhood records, has no past friendships that he’s willing to admit to, had no family that he allowed to talk to the press.
-PJ
Precisely right!!!! Nothing ever adds up with Obama
That is me. Born overseas to U.S. parents who needed documentation from the embassy to get me into the U.S.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.