troll
Posted on 01/02/2009 10:10:12 PM PST by I can has Low Taxes?
You know something? I like Mitt. A hell of a lot more than McCain, who I voted for. And I like Palin. Neither were MY choice for candidate, but I didn’t BADMOUTH any candidate all over the forum about it.
You are getting too obvious.
...anyone checked to see if there are ties to Romney...?
he has a history
bttt
You can help, though, if you run across a troll infestation, hit the “Report Abuse” button, and let the professionals deal with it.
***We have run across a troll infestation and lj has a list. If the admin mod agrees with your statement then we can proceed to a solution. But lj has already tried to open a thread to that effect and it was pulled with the comment, “no thanks”.
It’s probably better to quitely report abuse, rather than to start a thread out in public where the disruptors could add innocent names to it.
It’s probably better to quitely report abuse, rather than to start a thread out in public where the disruptors could add innocent names to it.
***I have no information on that. I don’t know how many of us freepers have quietly reported abuse and gotten no action. I do know that we have openly tried it and gotten a thread pulled. If I had confidence in the process I would follow it.
Here’s a ferinstance. I saw keyword abuse on the certifigate threads, reported it and the admin mod zotted the troll “searchin”. Then a while later I saw some more keyword abuse, reported it and whoever was on admin mod duty at the time basically said they were not going to do anything about it. I cc’d JimRob and the admin mod said, “whatever floats your boat”. The keyword abuse continued.
Well, I just know the Mods have a huge job to do, and no two people see things in exactly the same way, so we should expect there to be some difference in the decisions they make.
Whatever the case, I would still be concerned about innocent people being reported on a public thread created to OUT the trolls.
Unfortunately, we do not live in a perfect world. Far from it.
no two people see things in exactly the same way, so we should expect there to be some difference in the decisions they make.
***All we need is a basic minimum standard. Ferinstance, I had a long post removed because there were 2 words that were “naughty” according to the admin mod: bull shiite and a$$#0/e. But I’ve seen much, much worse continue to pass under their noses. So if the mods are going to hang their hat on this, they need to hang their hat. The reality of the situation is that the mods have a lot of capricious leeway and they use it on posters and subjects on which they intend to affect discourse. But if there was a minimum standard POSTED, where a dutiful freeper could go and see, “oh, I can’t use bull shiite but I can use bull feces” then the mods would have an easier job and they wouldn’t lose the confidence of dutiful freepers who notice their capriciousness. Yes, I know they have a difficult job to do but they are acting like Moses before his father in law set him straight.
What do you mean “polarize Obama” and the part about living in the same fantasy land that Clinton lived in?
I don’t understand what you meant.
Very good critique. I accept. Thanks.
troll
I’ve got 26 on my list; some are noobs, some have old signup dates. Some I’ve run into in the past and always were on the “liberal” side, some are out and out trolls. Some seem sort of regular but just for some reason really extra snarky and nasty about the BC issue.
The short list you pinged me to last night posted by a noob - jetxnet, I think is the one - is a strange list, and has people on it who are not trolls at all. Weird. How can someone who’s been here a few weeks start posting lists of trolls - who are not trolls? Very suspect.
But definitely lefists of probably various groups are in the trolling business bigtime. If the Mods here would either help sniff them out - since they can see the IPs etc - and get rid of them, or at least take a look when abuse button is hit, a lot of them would get cleaned out.
And regarding someone’s comment above - napscoordinator - the difference between a troll and someone honestly debating is pretty easy to detect. In honest debate both parties will agree to learn - read up - find out things. A troll just repeats the same damn crap over and over again, with duplicitous intent.
They never have anything positive to say about anything and just like to stir up trouble and disagreement.
Your explanation is fair. I am not going to get on Sarah threads until she announces she is running for President. They are a waste of time and resources. However, I wish her the best in her endeavors.
There are different kinds of trolls. Sounds like the kind hassling the Sarah site are the kind you describe.
Here’s another aspect of trolls that probably most would agree with (and also that there are different kinds of trolls) - an honest member just avoids the threads that don’t interest him. A troll will glom all over threads that supposedly don’t interest him/her, make cyncial, snide, snarky and belittling comments again and again. If not a bona fide troll, at least a maladjusted person who just likes making a stink and aggravating people.
Sometimes an honest non-troll might make comments of disagreement of course, but the disagreement will be on-topic, not throwing crap into the punchbowl!
Just a couple of thoughts about the matter in general...
The UAW?
I’ve got 26 on my list; some are noobs, some have old signup dates.
***What would you suggest be done to cleanse FR of these trolls, Granny? You know the mods have a tough job to do. Are they willing to do it?
I think this photo fits well why the people from DU, 4-chan, etc. attacked. Plus it's from Team Sarah (where I am a member, recommend joining)
Team Sarah has had to dump troll galore after they decided that it would be fun to go over and post malicous and racist comments. They have Zotted almost 90 already. According to I can has Low Taxes (great name btw) It was from 4chan.org ( I would assume /b, which means it would be every 12-16 year old who you never want your kid to hang out with, but is probably their best friend; there is a reason 4-chan is called the sewer of the internet) somethingaweful.com, and DU, which would account for any one from 16-20.
Next we have an article from the Washington Post (here is an article from Fox with the misinformation, but still a good one), where we have Palin defending her family from all the mis-information that has been passed around their family when it comes to Bristol and her fiancee. They had both been reported to have dropped out of school. What the truth is that Bristol is starting her last semester online Levi is also taking classes, while also working as a electrical apprentice.
Palin is also to meet with foreign diplomats from Europe, Asia, and Russia for Alaska's 50th anniversary. Damn if you'll get this kind of exposure in Congress for years. Why I want her to stay governor of Alaska.
Palin is the frontrunner in Odds for 2012. What more can I say, other than to keep this will be hard. Who though that McCain or Obama (well other than the MSM who started campaigning for Obama the second he hit office). Just being realistic, though she'll have the advantage of already been shredded by the press.
Lastly we have an article on how Palin was named GOOF by Robert Roeper in Chicago, and based it on two different liberal lies. /bashes head into wall
Alright, I've been gone for a reason (other than sucky doctor appointments) See:
It's almost done, couple more changes, but tell me what you think? (I'd put it in for the header)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.