Skip to comments.Why Obama has already lost in Supreme Court v Barack Obama aka Barry Soetoro et al
Posted on 01/11/2009 9:18:59 AM PST by FreeManN
Im smiling so much now because all this time Barack Obama has hired teams of lawyers to go to court and ask to dismiss all these lawsuits that have one similar themeshow proof you were born in the United States.
But now because just one of these nuisance cases (as Obama sees it) has made it to the Supreme Court, the Justices have already out manoeuvred Obama and his team of high priced attorneys.
First, theyve cornered Obama with a move of check by setting a conference date of January 9th (24 hours after congress counts the Electoral Colleges votes) to discuss Bergs writ of certiorari; the case cant be dismissedBerg will have legal standing!
And finally the Supreme Court has made its devastating move of checkmate by allowing a conference on January 16th to discuss Bergs injunction to stop congress in counting the Electoral Colleges votes!
Theres no more wriggle room left for Obama because essentially its a fait accompli by January 9th for him to hand over his evidence to the Justices otherwise, if he doesnt comply by January 16th, the Justices will have it within their power to retroactively cancel the results from the January 8th Electoral Colleges vote count!
So Obama tried to play a game of legal chess against the Supreme Courtwell guess what? Obamayouve already lost! Checkmate!
I believe it when I see it. But I pray that you are right.
This sounds like another API fantasy. Scotus is never gonna do anything.
What you say may be true, and I may live to see the day when your viewpoint is vindicated (for the record, I hope you are right).
But something tells me that Obama is going to be sworn on January 20 and he will be your President for the next four years: Constitution, facts, logic and the Law notwithstanding.
Note that if just one SC justice is in fear of his life, he may set aside his scruples and shut down the case. We'll see....
Has anyone seen or posted any documents, brief, or response filed in any court by Obama’s attorneys?
The fact that it’s gone as far as it has is noteworthy.
Is that you, Pollyanna?
It would be sweet and it would be wonderful to see the Constitution upheld. But I think you’re dreaming. This whole thing is going to quietly pass right on by without even a whimper.
On Friday the SCOTUS did not engage in a move of check. Rather, they moved an out of the way pawn and yielded control of the center of the board. This is poor chess and poor political maneuvering.
He hasn’t had to because none of the cases have been able to establish standing. Without standing there is no case. Until standing can be shown they are frivilous cases.
And in the real world, John Roberts, Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court will administer the Oath of Office to Barack Hussein Obama on January 20th, 2009.
It'll be on TV if you want to watch it live.
My guess as a non-lawyer is that as long as the SCOTUS members do not issue a ruling, no precedent is set that could affect future court cases of this type. Because of the sensitivity of this particular election, and the ramifications of ruling that Obama would not be eligible to be president, the SCOTUS members may not want to rock the boat at this time, but want to leave the door open for future challenges of future presidents to be.
This is just my uneducated opinion.
I’m not terribly interested in this issue because it will not be allowed to unseat the Messiah.
Still, he could end all this by simply providing it. He won’t, and that puzzles me.
Doing so would make the right wing look foolish.
Not doing so makes him seem foolish.
I wonder how much money Berg has been able to generate with this charade? I’d wager a guess that at least 1000 people have sent in the $50 he is requesting. Nice little moonlighting gig.
"The justices are considering your petition."
They why does every thread say that OB has spent hundreds of thousands in attorney fees fighting the cases?
How is Obama “checkmated” just because the court ssets a couple hearing dates?
Decisions are announced the Monday following the conferences, around 10am, IIRC. Whatever they decided on Friday the 9th will be announced on Monday the 12th.
Perhaps not, be he could put an end to this.
For whatever reason, he’s chosen not to.
I will be pleased if I am wrong, but I’m not.
Think about it.
If you were a Supreme what would be your greater fear?
1) An incompetent illegal alien hires a hit man to kill me or;
2) An radical-islam-supporting-illegitimate POTUS allows terrorists to bomb the Supreme Court.
Isn’t it a no-brainer? bo’s buddy ayers already bombed the Capitol. If the SC allows bo to be POTUS, they must know that the SC will be bombed within days by bo allies, since the SC is our last Civil Defense against bo.
Because it makes the need to raise money for this “fight” an easier sell. As best I can tell so far all this is about is extracting money from as many conservative’s pockets as they can sell on the validity of their “case”. I would file it under “scam”.
From what I can tell he feels he has already put an end to it from the earlier release of the BC on the web. As a practical matter most attorney’s would say that once you start reposnding to these types of frivilous suits you just invite more.
Just like every thread claims he traveled to Pakistan when it was prohibited for Americans to travel there (travel was not prohibited). If you repeat something so many times people will accept it as the truth and say "it must be true because I've read about it so many times on the internet!"
In this case, the argument goes something like this: Routine motions to dismiss have been filed on Obama's behalf. Lawyers are expensive. Therefore, Obama must have spent hundreds of thousands (sometimes millions) of dollars fighting to keep his birth certificate sealed (something the State of Hawaii does for free in accordance with state law).
At this point, that's probably the best guess.
After The One gets impeached, or moves home to a thatched hut in Kenya, perhaps measures to prevent such a problem again will be quietly implemented....like asking for a damn birth certificate at the state level when running for the nomination.
The cost to Berg so far would be at a max $500 and his time.
Ahh the paid obamabot rears its head right on cue.
Pure fantasy. You’ve lost it dude.
Don't wanna miss out on all the fun!
You must be a masochist.
Sums up Bambi in total.
Obama has already lost because of other facets.
On November 13, allegations surface that the Selective Service System registration form showing that Obama registered for the draft is a forgery. The forms document location number (DLN), 0897080632, indicates a 2008 entry into the federal system, because the first two digits (08) indicate the year. (Had Obama registered in 1980, the first two digits of the DLN would have been 80, rather than 08.) Obamas document also appears to be a 1990 form, modified to look like a 1980 form. The date the form was signed is July 30, 1980, yet the form has a date stamp of July 29. The date stamp reflects the letters USPO for United States Post Office, but in 1980 the letters would have been USPS, for United States Postal Service. A retired federal agent had requested the Obama form via the Freedom of Information Act; it took almost a full year for the document to be found. Note that Obamas story about registering for the draft has changed more than once. He originally said he registered for the draft on 1979, when he turned age 18, but there was no requirement to register at that time. Note that failure to register with the Selective Service is punishable by a fine of up to $250,000 and/or up to five years in prison; it also renders the individual ineligible for any job in the Executive Branch of government or the U.S. Postal Service [483,493]
An Obama campaign spokeswoman tells reporters that lawsuits attempting to force the candidate to prove he is eligible to serve as President are garbage. At the same time, Obama continues to refuse to produce his birth certificate, and has sheriff’s deputies stationed at two hospitals in Honolulu, where they are preventing press inquiries and attempts to request copies of records. 
How are they frivolous? He produced a forged CoLB document towards a straightforward constitutional requirement. Frivolous cases do not get forwarded for conference in SCOTUS 5 times. Note that most of the trolls operating on these threads do not answer these contentions. We’ll see if that doesn’t apply to you.
I hope the attorneys continue to tell him not to respond if the SCOTUS requests a copy of the long form BC.
Wondered how fast you would show up here. So how much do you get paid to monitor these bc posts and report back to Axelrod?
This is just my uneducated opinion.
Let's try to get inside the mind of the SCOTUS as it's operating right now. What's grabbing their attention?
SCOTUSblog.com has decided to hear Crawford v. Marion County Election Board and Indiana Democratic Party v. Rokita as consolidated cases. These cases concern voter ID guidelines and voting rights.
Take a look at how the Justices are split on this issue.
I'll post this as a separate article ("The Partisan Elephant in the Room") because I think it has a bearing on the fortunes of the BO natural-born qualification cases currently before SCOTUS.
But if the sheriff’s deputies are in Honolulu, what’s the problem? Presumably they are protecting HAWAIIAN birth records...
I think a better word would be asshole.
So Drew68 and DE88 are the same person?
Nah. The real masochists are the ones waiting every Friday for the Great Pumpkin to appear with a writ of certiorari in its hand, only to be disappointed again and again and again and again...
Lots of noise, but just that. This Obama corrupt political machine will not allow the SC to have any power. We are in the first stages of Communism and very little can be done. The vast liberal followers believed this nitwit.
I bet you have pictures of zer0 on the ceiling above your bed so you can go to sleep and wake up adoring your master.
How is it frivilous? It has been ruled that he has no standing to bring the issue forth. All he has to do is make an application with the Supreme Court to have his Writ to request a conference. It is not referred or forwarded by any other court.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.