http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2005/29jul_planetx.htm
“planet X” is not a theory. NASA announced its discovery in 2005, 20 years after it was located. And 10 years after building an observatory in Anatarctica capable of watching it.
If this 10th planet is “planet X”, the orbit it is on is elliptical, not circular, around our sun. Hence the calamity when its elliptical orbit swings from beyind the solar systemn and through our solar system, between planets if we are somewhat lucky. However, the forces exerted on earth by this planet (or possibly a binary system of a planet orbiting its own brown dwarf star), will be devastating, as will be the aftermath of comet-like debris
If nothing else, Planet X (aka, Eris, or Nibiru or God Planet etc) explains a lot of ancient lore that is strikingly similar in cultures all over the globe.
Time should tell fairly soon (later this year or next) if this is “Planet X” and if the effects will be a physical threat to life as we know it - or not.
http://www.december212012.com/articles/PlanetX_Nibiru/NASA_AND_PLANET_X.htm
Wrong.
The discovery of 2003 UB313 Eris, the 10th planet largest known dwarf planet
by Michael Brown
http://www.gps.caltech.edu/~mbrown/planetlila/
[snip] ...The orbit of the new dwarf planet is even more eccentric than that of Pluto. Pluto moves from 30 to 50 times the sun-earth distance over its 250 year orbit, while the new planet moves from 38 to 97 times the sun-earth distance over its 560 year orbit. [end]
Do you know what this would mean from NASA’s SOHO
taken on 3/27/09
http://sohodata.nascom.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/data_query_search_movie
SOHO Nasa image can be found at:
http://sohodata.nascom.nasa.gov/cgi-b...
Select LASCO C3 and enter start and end dates 2009/03/27
scroll through images until you reach the time stamp 3:18