Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Roush Propane F-150
Fox News ^ | Wednesday, March 18, 2009 | Gary Gastelu

Posted on 03/19/2009 8:15:34 PM PDT by nickcarraway

When people talk about alternative fuels, propane isn't usually the first topic that comes up. This is because they’ve probably never driven in a propane-powered vehicle, and for the past few decades have been bombarded with all kinds of talk about ethanol (E85), hydrogen and flux capacitors being the saviors of the human race.

So you may be surprised to hear that propane is actually the third most commonly used motor vehicle fuel, ahead of all of those, compressed natural gas (CNG), and eye of newt. According to the U.S. Department of Energy there are even more places to buy propane than E85. Maybe the reason it doesn't come up too often, then, is because it's not really all that alternative.

A quick primer. Propane is a byproduct of both petroleum refining and the processing of natural gas, so it's a fossil fuel and a non-renewable resource. However, more than 85 percent of the propane sold in the United States comes from U.S. soil, literally, and pretty much all of the rest of it is imported from Canada and Mexico, which makes it appealing to energy security types. Although it is widely used as a heating fuel, much of what is recovered is burned off as waste during oil refining, as anyone who has driven down the New Jersey Turnpike at night can attest to.

A gas in its natural form, propane is easily compressed into a liquid, making it less cumbersome to transport and store than CNG or Hydrogen. It’s also very pure and clean-burning, with the added benefit of being non toxic to the environment, which is why you can install a tank of it just about anywhere and use it to barbecue brisket. The combustion process also produces less carbon dioxide than gasoline or diesel.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Hobbies; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: oil; propane; trucks

1 posted on 03/19/2009 8:15:34 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

In my experience, which is limited to a pair of Kohler engines for a back-up power supply, propane engines can be difficult to start in cold weather.


2 posted on 03/19/2009 8:21:18 PM PDT by PUGACHEV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I bought one from Hank Hill at Strickland Propane and Propane Accessories.


3 posted on 03/19/2009 8:22:41 PM PDT by NavVet ( If you don't defend Conservatism in the Primaries, you won't have it to defend in November)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I bought one from Hank Hill at Strickland Propane and Propane Accessories.


4 posted on 03/19/2009 8:23:17 PM PDT by NavVet ( If you don't defend Conservatism in the Primaries, you won't have it to defend in November)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Burn-wise, propane is similar to methane (natural gas) but I believe it yields more energy (BTUs) since more (3x more) chemical bonds are being broken when it combusts.

Propane can be a tad dicey because it is heavier than air (methane is not) so, propane is bad to use on boats, for example, where the vapor can sink into nooks and crannies in the hull & form an explosive misture....over long periods of time.

Otherwise, it burns clean and hot.


5 posted on 03/19/2009 8:46:18 PM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (Mr. Bernanke, have you started working on your book about the second GREATER depression?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Image and video hosting by TinyPic
6 posted on 03/19/2009 8:56:17 PM PDT by Cyber Ninja (His legacy is a stain OnTheDress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Attention Surplus Disorder

Methane is horribly corrosive. You don’t wan’t it in your engine.


7 posted on 03/19/2009 9:47:48 PM PDT by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Attention Surplus Disorder

And propane is dangerous...compared to other fuels.

Natural gas seems the logical choice.


8 posted on 03/19/2009 9:49:20 PM PDT by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre

“Methane is horribly corrosive”

Do you have a source for that statement?


9 posted on 03/19/2009 9:53:25 PM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (Mr. Bernanke, have you started working on your book about the second GREATER depression?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Attention Surplus Disorder

Personal experience.

It leaves green crappy crusty fuzz on all metalic surfaces it comes in contact with...or I should say the combustion products given off by the burning of methane do so. I don’t know what that green junk is, but it eats holes in non stainless steels real fast.


10 posted on 03/19/2009 9:58:40 PM PDT by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Attention Surplus Disorder

Technically, the gas I am referring to isn’t pure methane, but a gas that is referred to as “bio-gas”. It is supposedly a mixture of methane and carbon dioxide and it reclaimed at sewage treatment plants and landfills, for the most part. They burn the gas for heat and for generating process steam.

It’s very nasty stuff. The excessive maintenance expenses eat up the fuel savings and then some.


11 posted on 03/19/2009 10:03:08 PM PDT by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre

Nope, by far natural gas is more dangerous as a vehicle fuel in that the tanks are required to hold approx. 3,000 PSI. Propane is somewhere around 180 PSI.

The numbers are approximate but I do not want to be driving around with a couple of tanks in my trunk with 3,000 pounds pressure.

That idiot T Boone Pickens is pushing this idea really hard, including having 18 wheelers running around on our interstates powered with this stuff. We all know what an 18 wheeler wreck looks like with very stable diesel fuel. Now imagine that same wreck with 1,000 gallons of LNG pressurized to 3,000 psi will look like.


12 posted on 03/19/2009 10:43:06 PM PDT by biff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: PUGACHEV

That is why back in the day we used butane which vaporizes better in colder weather. Hard to come by nowdays.

As a side note, mountain climbers, when going high and extremely cold will use butane fuel for their cook stoves. Propane will pour like water and not vaporize when it gets much below 0 degrees F.


13 posted on 03/19/2009 10:48:57 PM PDT by biff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: biff
True dat regarding mountaineering and backpacking stoves.

When I was a yoot and trying to climb a mountain, I found that my fuel did not work in my stove at altitude. I was at about 11K ft. I ate cold granola bars that night.

14 posted on 03/20/2009 6:14:36 AM PDT by I Buried My Guns (I just hope CW2 comes before my creaky knees give out completely!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: biff
Propane will pour like water and not vaporize when it gets much below 0 degrees F.

I'm not so sure. I lived in Montana for 5 years and fried turkeys outdoors when it was below zero plenty of times.

15 posted on 03/20/2009 6:18:26 AM PDT by CholeraJoe (I'm not exceptionally intelligent, I'm just old. Y'know like Yoda.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre

Aha, yes, if you’re talking about raw “swamp gas” collected au naturel and not commecially purified, no question about it, you’ll have some sulfur gases in there. Those will stink up the joint and make sulfuric/sulfurous acid which will corrode the hell out of many metal parts. Could get some nitrogen oxides in there too, probably less, but still makes nitric/nitrous acids on combustion. Yeah. The gas itself would run an engine OK, but the pollutants would eat the insides.

Normally, commercial nat gas would be purified, probably by liquifying it, and those pollutants would be separated pretty easily. So you’d have pretty clean methane with a little ethane & propane as “pollutants”.


16 posted on 03/20/2009 6:27:28 AM PDT by Attention Surplus Disorder (Mr. Bernanke, have you started working on your book about the second GREATER depression?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: NavVet
You know of course that this is the last season for "King of the Hill."

I don't know about Little Tommy Daschle, but I'm deeply saddened.

17 posted on 03/20/2009 7:19:26 AM PDT by A_Tradition_Continues (formerly known as Politicalwit ...05/28/98...Ain't no Newbie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson