Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: allmendream

Good for you. This is not about what you gave up for your clearances, nor is it about convicted felons. Average Joe citizen might value his privacy both medically and legally, but then by your reasoning it would not be a stretch to put him in the database because there’s always the possibility he might be a felon in the future.


53 posted on 03/26/2009 5:58:49 PM PDT by valkyry1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: valkyry1

I have already said I am against collection of DNA without probable cause.

I think being a convicted felon is probable cause.

You may disagree, but the citizens of Virginia agree that it is and voted for it.

Do you disagree?


54 posted on 03/26/2009 6:06:30 PM PDT by allmendream ("Wealth is EARNED not distributed, so how could it be redistributed?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

To: valkyry1
by your reasoning it would not be a stretch to put him in the database because there’s always the possibility he might be a felon in the future.

Since that's a typical eugenic way of thinking, it's not surprising to see a Darwinian (allmendream) advocating it.

99 posted on 04/14/2009 7:14:55 PM PDT by Ethan Clive Osgoode (<<== Click here to learn about Darwinism!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson