Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hiring Joe Legal versus Hiring Jose Illegal!!!
6/22/9 | e-mail

Posted on 06/22/2009 7:55:52 AM PDT by ignorancerunsrampant

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: wrhssaxensemble
But that has absolutely nothing to do with the inequalities between Jose and Joe.

It does though. Jose will spend it on a car that Joe can't afford. Jose will by more tequila that Joe can't afford. Clearly Jose's money will go back into both economies: Black market and real. Joe, unfortunately, has been compromised into subsidizing the man who is doing everything illegal.

21 posted on 06/22/2009 9:12:02 AM PDT by raybbr (It's going to get a lot worse now that the anchor babies are voting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: DoctorTomorrow
And don’t forget, Jose Illegal’s employer gets to keep an extra $20,800. That’s why, from his perspective, it’s not a bad idea.

With that amount, or more, per employee, I'd guess the employer also wouldn't be too concerned about a measly $5000 fine once every five or ten years.

22 posted on 06/22/2009 9:17:47 AM PDT by meadsjn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ignorancerunsrampant

Verify range to target. One ping only.


23 posted on 06/22/2009 9:26:55 AM PDT by TheCause ("that these United Colonies are, and of right ought to be, free and independent States")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

Right but my point is that the government stealing from Joe to give to Jose does not have any net benefit on the US economy; if anything it is a loss in favor of Jose’s home country


24 posted on 06/22/2009 9:36:31 AM PDT by wrhssaxensemble (Piyush "Bobby" Jindal in 2012 after Obama makes an even bigger mess of everything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: wrhssaxensemble
Right but my point is that the government stealing from Joe to give to Jose does not have any net benefit on the US economy; if anything it is a loss in favor of Jose’s home country

Without a doubt. But you can't say that Jose's money/earnings is a total loss to the U.S. economy which this article/letter implies.

25 posted on 06/22/2009 9:38:27 AM PDT by raybbr (It's going to get a lot worse now that the anchor babies are voting!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ignorancerunsrampant

“Jose Illegal receives a $500 per month Federal rent subsidy. Jose Illegal pays rent. $500.00 per month (section 8 housing). $6,000.00 per year.”

More likely his monthly payment would be less than $50.

I do work on a condo that rents for $1,850/mo. and section 8 pays all but $50 of it.


26 posted on 06/22/2009 9:43:01 AM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Bump


27 posted on 06/22/2009 10:53:17 AM PDT by MissNomer (Proud member of FR's "Final 300")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

no. That is true. But it is certainly less of a gain than if Joe did not have to prop up Jose. Further, it is much more of a gain for Mexico or whatever Jose’s home country is than for the US


28 posted on 06/22/2009 10:55:24 AM PDT by wrhssaxensemble (Piyush "Bobby" Jindal in 2012 after Obama makes an even bigger mess of everything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ignorancerunsrampant

“Don’t vote for any politician that supports illegal aliens.”

Well, everyone who voted for McShamnesty & Palin did.

How about we learn from our mistakes.


29 posted on 06/22/2009 5:54:49 PM PDT by Kimberly GG (PALIN - Supports a "path to citizenship" for ILLEGAL ALIENS.........../.......... Sanford '12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raybbr

Your post and defense of Jose make a case for a fair tax or national sales tax. Even drug dealers spend money, even ILLEGALS spend money.


30 posted on 06/23/2009 5:35:44 AM PDT by Tspud1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Kimberly GG

McCain was so the wrong guy for the job. I LOVE the Republican party, but we have to move away from the ... “it’s his turn bullshnit”. Anyone could have beaten Clinton one-on-one in his second term run, only Bob Dole could lose in a three way race. But it was his turn. Me thinks Romney would have done a much better job than McCain. Romney/Jindahl, Romney/Palin, Pawlenty/Jindahl, Pawlenty/Palin. Hopefully we find the right candidate for the job and ask the guy who thinks it is his turn to step aside in 2012.


31 posted on 06/23/2009 7:59:02 AM PDT by ignorancerunsrampant (Where is the Court of Common Sense?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson