To: real_patriotic_american
I suggest that you watch fast. As you are no doubt aware, the Supreme Court has unanimously voted not to hear further cases of this nature, based as they are on nothing but inflammatory rhetoric. Since the President has already provided proof of citizenship to the courts, and the Supreme Court has affirmed that certification, this is nothing more than a nuisance lawsuit.Whatever decision this particular judge makes is moot, the question is settled.
To: KMar20009
Are you one of Obama’s public relations crew? I don’t believe a word of what you said.
To: KMar20009
72 posted on
07/14/2009 9:15:46 AM PDT by
Fresh Wind
(When the going gets tough, the tough go out for ice cream.)
To: KMar20009
As you are no doubt aware, the Supreme Court has unanimously voted not to hear further cases of this nature, based as they are on nothing but inflammatory rhetoric. That was not the reason SCOTUS hasn't heard one of the cases.
Since the President has already provided proof of citizenship to the courts, and the Supreme Court has affirmed that certification
Oh? When did that happen and where is your proof?
93 posted on
07/14/2009 10:30:58 AM PDT by
YellowRoseofTx
(Evil is not the opposite of God; it's the absence of God)
To: KMar20009
Ah, a professional liar now comes to play obamanoid sycophant. Would you care to substantiate just how it is that you claim this affirmative action liar has shown proof to the court and the SCOTUS has affirmed that proof?
It is interesting to note that this bastard in the Oval Office has to have professional liars slug sliming on the internet, to protect his fraudulency. But then again, this is what rule by a criminal enterprise is all about, voters.
100 posted on
07/14/2009 11:24:20 AM PDT by
MHGinTN
(Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
To: KMar20009
124 posted on
07/15/2009 5:04:21 PM PDT by
PA Engineer
(Liberate America from the occupation media.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson