[Political Junkie Too]

All techniques aside, even a child can see that there is no way that the heavily embossed Seal and pronounced second fold line in the document object shown in the photos would NOT show up in a scan of it. As you know, the "scan image" -- the one and only image to which all people refer -- had a barely visible Seal impression, and absolutely and unequivocally, NO 2nd FOLD LINE.

I've been following all your reports, but I have to ask this question regarding the folds. Pardon my own made-up terminology.

How would an "inside fold" differ from an "outside fold" when scanned? The COLB in the fold had an accordian-fold, the top fold being an "outside fold" and the bottom fold being an "inside fold." The top fold's crease would be raised towards the scanner, while the bottom fold's crease would be on the back side of the document, showing the concave side towards the scanner.

I'm not a detractor, you know, but I wonder how the different folds would show up (or not) on scans.

-PJ

[Danae]

I suppose it would all depend on how it was folded, by the persons handling it. Mine has lots of folds LOL