I want to know something. Back in 2000, the election results were held up for quite a while over hanging chads. If I remember right, it was something like three weeks. How come, first, on election night, the press called the election exactly at 11 PM EST just in time for the late local news. And second, why was this guy innagurated when there were several lawsuits over his eligibility swirling around. Just seems to me that eligibility is a much more important issue than pregnant chads and they would have wanted to settle this issue to put it to bed. Just asking. Still doesn’t make sense.
Correct! And this violation of the Constitution is far worse than Watergate, Clinton/Llewsinsky and Andrew Jackson.
You wrote-
“I want to know something. Back in 2000, the election results were held up for quite a while over hanging chads. If I remember right, it was something like three weeks. How come, first, on election night, the press called the election exactly at 11 PM EST just in time for the late local news. And second, why was this guy innagurated when there were several lawsuits over his eligibility swirling around. Just seems to me that eligibility is a much more important issue than pregnant chads and they would have wanted to settle this issue to put it to bed. Just asking. Still doesn’t make sense.”