Astrology, like evolution, is believed by those who desperately want to believe it. Astronomy is scientific, as far as I know. Maybe there are some debates. Evolution is purely speculative, much like astology, in my view.
Before I believe any of the macro-evolutionary tale, I want someone to describe, step by step, how amoebas became human over “billions and billions” of years. Until then, I cast my lot with God and ID. Blessings, Bob
>>Astrology, like evolution, is believed by those who desperately want to believe it. Astronomy is scientific, as far as I know. Maybe there are some debates. Evolution is purely speculative, much like astology, in my view.<<
We need go no further. Your view is not based in science. And my point is that ID is the same as astrology and is NOT by any possible real definition an “alternative theory” since it meets exactly zero criteria for a Scientific Theory.