Signed Certificate of Live Birth for BO

[BP2]

I guess now you know it's not reputable.

Gosh, mlo, do you mean like the reputability of these nice folks that conspire against you & your family on a daily basis?

[rocco55]

AMEN ! Couldn’t have said it better myself ! Thx !

[Typelouder]

That’s the one I received....It must be ‘Offishal’ then.

[mlo]

Stop trolling.

[IntolerantOfTreason]

Could you please forward this on to Orly Taitz (dr_taitz@yahoo.com) ? She is the attorney going to trial against Zero in January next year, and could benefit from additional evidence. Thanks for your patriotism.

[Seizethecarp]

Obamafile says this BC doesn't look like the “control copy” but they link to a 1978 document, so that is not comparable.

On that 1978 document the form field corresponding to the 1961 document field containing “378-18.8” has been used to make a typed entry six months after the birth was recorded proving that this field is used by officials to type in updating information long after the birth.

This raises the possibility that “378-18.8” may have been typed onto the 1961 document long after the birth, even years after the birth to note reclassification of the document under updated statutes. A new 378-18.8 statute might have required a review and reclassification that would have been typed onto the document on review.

Note how the line of type with “378-18.8” doesn't align with the typing at the beginning the field indicating that the document was reinserted into a typewriter before the statute was typed indicating a different time frame for that typing, and “per grandmother” doesn't align either indicating a third insertion and a possible third time frame for that comment.

At a minimum, an image of this document was obtained after passage of 378-18.8, but who knows what alterations could have been made based on further testimony to amend this document to reflect a Honolulu birth. (Wild aside: maybe Stanley Ann “confessed” to her mother that she only “pretended” to go to Kenya, called in the birth and Grandma reports it to HI vital statistics, but she had “actually” never left Honolulu? Then new BC is put in vital records that we don't have that corrects the improperly reported Kenya birth?)

There are two signatures in addition to Dunham's that could be tied to actual persons and validated if it came to that.

[TankerKC]

At least I got a new tag line out of this thread.

[TankerKC]

I did receive from a reputable source, but looks like it is inaccurate.

Define "reputable source" then...

[Pan_Yan]

I did receive from a reputable source, but looks like it is inaccurate.

So instead of

'Fake but Accurate'

your source is

'Reputable but Inaccurate?'

[thecraw]

[GregNH]

It looks like the signatures were from the same hand. Even the dates are from the same hand. They made the “8’s” look different but the slashes are identical IMHO

[LucyT]

. . . to article and #66.

.

[BP2]

Always treat stuff like this as a hoax.

However ... do we have a copy of Ann’s signature anywhere for comparison?

[MHGinTN]

BINGO!

[Vendome]

you’re too much.

[Genoa]

It purports to be the signature of the grandmother, which here looks like “Madlyn Payne Dunham.” Spelling??

[Seizethecarp]

The first two signatures do not look remotely similar to me. Look at the M’s just to start with. The M’s start in a different place and are constucted entirely differently, although the same pen seems to have been used, which one would expect if signed at the same time. The third signature is with a different thicker ink and is unintelligible to me, unlike the previous two.

[danamco]

Sorry, your latest freep-mail shows nothing!!!

[Vendome]

Probably something about his cousin in Lesotho.

Where do these guys come from?

I am going through this post just for laughs.

Too much!

[GregNH]

I agree that the beginning letters are different but if you are forging then the beginning is foremost on your mind. If you look into the body of each signature the angles look like they all fall into the same slant.