Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Craigslist Prostitution Case Dismissed
AVVO.COM ^ | 24 OCTOBER 2009 | AVVO.COM

Posted on 10/24/2009 10:48:13 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist

The court case filed by an Illinois County Sheriff alleging the Craigslist website abets prostitution was thrown out by a federal judge this week.

Cook County Sheriff Tom Dart contended that the erotic services portion of the website constituted a "horrific" breach of U.S. law, alleging that the site had facilitated the largest source of prostitution in the country. He also said Craigslist aids underage pimping and human trafficking, ABC News reports.

Federal Judge John Grady, however, ruled that the intermediary website cannot be held liable for assisting customers who misuse their service to break the law. "If users routinely flout Craigslist guidelines it is not because Craigslist has caused them to do so," Grady wrote in his decision.

After Dart filed the lawsuit in July, Craigslist changed the section name from "erotic services" to "adult services" and added new precautions to pre-screen advertisements posted in the category. The website has always had regulations barring prostitutes from soliciting business on the site.

"We're very interested in pursuing this to the next level as far as an appeal," Dart told the news source.

The Craigslist website collects more than 20 billion page views each month.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS: craigslist; prostitution

1 posted on 10/24/2009 10:48:14 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
I think it is the correct decision.
2 posted on 10/24/2009 10:52:02 AM PDT by Perdogg (Sarah Palin-Jim DeMint 2012 - Liz Cheney for Sec of State - Duncan Hunter SecDef)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
He also said Craigslist aids underage pimping and human trafficking, ABC News reports. Federal Judge John Grady, however, ruled that the intermediary website cannot be held liable for assisting customers who misuse their service to break the law.

Does that mean the Digital Millennium Copyright Act is unconstitutional? Can I set up a Bittorrent site without fear now?

3 posted on 10/24/2009 10:52:50 AM PDT by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeeSharp

I guess I figure that if prostitution is illegal everywhere in America, except parts of Nevada, aren’t ads for illegal activity also illegal?

Could you have Craiglist ads to hire a hitman to kill somebody, for example?

Could you have Craiglist ads with the drug gangs openly selling their drugs?

I guess I wonder exactly where lines are drawn with advertising for illegal things.


4 posted on 10/24/2009 10:58:37 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

Place your ad and take your chances.


5 posted on 10/24/2009 11:00:41 AM PDT by Concho
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

They advertised in newspaper classifieds for years.

This is no different.


6 posted on 10/24/2009 11:14:20 AM PDT by Erik Latranyi (Too many conservatives urge retreat when the war of politics doesn't go their way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

But that’s not exactly the question. You can’t advertise illegal things. But if you do then why is anyone but you guilty? The Illinois sheriff wants to make the website guilty as well.


7 posted on 10/24/2009 11:26:17 AM PDT by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
While I'll concede that crackhead street walkers are a public nuisance, don't the police have better things to occupy their time with besides using craigslist to engage in sting operations all to bust consenting adults engaging in sex with other consenting adults in private settings?

I'm sorry but these laws never made much sense to me. If a guy wants to go over to a woman's home, engage in consensual sex and then he leaves a couple hundred bucks on the nightstand, who really cares? Not me. Really, how different is this from the countless beautiful young women looking specifically for a rich older man? How different is it really from getting paid to have sex in a porno film? No difference as far as I can see. Just a silly misuse of valuable police resources.

8 posted on 10/24/2009 11:29:24 AM PDT by Drew68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego
That raises a question in that since prostitution IS legal in Nevada, any ads for service within Nevada are most likely legal also no matter where they are accessed from.

The website operator has no control of where the web site is accessed from and he probably could not be held liable for not preventing access from outside of Nevada.

I personally do not approve of prostitution or promiscuous sex and/or adultery and I also do not encourage any of those activities. I am simply commenting based upon previous law suits that I have seen.

9 posted on 10/24/2009 1:18:23 PM PDT by dglang
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Erik Latranyi

True. Also in the Phone Book in the Yellow Pages.


10 posted on 10/24/2009 5:31:55 PM PDT by gusty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson