Posted on 11/04/2009 10:04:09 AM PST by OldDeckHand
Why is it that so many women of let’s call it extreme beauty, who want to be in the public eye; succumb to this?
So perhaps she’s not extremely intelligent but Dr. Laura is; and even she has photographic baggage.
Arrg!
and... if you do make a sex tape NEVER... NEVER believe for a moment it will not appear at the most inopportune time. Why folks never learn is beyond me.
Thanks. It’s nice to see when people can own up and correct there own path. Cool!
And to think that David Letterman was able to get the authorities to prosecute the man who blackmailed him over a sex scandal.
The pageant had a sex tape but still paid her $100,000? Yeah, right. If there was a sex tape, it would be released and they wouldn’t have paid a dime. $100,000 is not walking away with nothing.
I believe the contract she signed when entering the pageant specifically required the contestants to disclose any nude or semi-nude photos or videos they had “modeled” for. She signed a statement that there were no such photos/videos of her.
That would make the video relevant to her case, as it would show the breached the contract. The fact that she lied on the application would also impeach her credibility as a witness in the case.
If the tape actually exists (and I trust TMZ a lot more than NBC, CNN or the NY Times) it would completely destroy her case.
It's ALREADY been distributed to TMZ. The cat is out of the bag and you can bet that there are copies floating around.
The media is overrun with the Lavender Mafia.
And thank you very much!
Remember when they said a modelling photo of underwear was “partially nude” even though her back was to the camera?
There are times when DESCRIBING a situation makes the reader create his or her own picture in the mind. Sounds like TMZ viewers are dirty minded folk.
If that’s what made her happy, who are we to judge her?
<><><><><><><><><
Well if that’s the standard we are now working from, JimRob may as well shut this place down, doncha think?
If all posts of judgement were deleted from the archives of FR, we could fit the remainder on a single sided floppy disk in my old IBM PC 5150, circa 1981.
ping
Not a lawyer, but it seems to me that this would not be admissible, and in fact any attorney on her side should have been able to get an injunction against her opponents preventing them from distributing it or even making claims about its existence.
<><><><><><><
In doing so, she pretty much admits the tape exists, and it would be personally embarrassing for it to be released. Catch 22 if you will.
It didn’t hurt Vanessa Williams...
bless me father for I have sinned...
next time just release the sex tapes and spare us the pagent.
and can carrie carry a tune?
the one thing carrie has against her is the full force of the gay lobby. hollywood might not touch her even if she can sing or act.
Gulfbreeze actually got the answer correct. Christians are to settle disputs among themselves whenever possible. But it is a Christian vs Christian rule. Best to repeat it as close as possible in the future because when you add to the truth, you are subtracting from it.
it is extortion.
they say they will not release the tape but the tape will be released anyways.
Well, yes the Hollywood homos will do anything to win. However, that doesn’t change the fact that Carrie is a skank and an attention whore. Or, just a whore. Anybody who makes a sex tape is not exactly the “queen of morality.”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.