To: Gomez
This must have been paid for by Symantec since the article completely avoided where Norton really loses: resources used, stability, and ability to uninstall cleanly.
8 posted on
11/06/2009 8:12:16 AM PST by
discostu
(The Bluebird of Happiness long absent from his life, Ned is visited by the Chicken of Depression)
To: discostu
I had to reformat and reinstall everything to clean up the mess Norton 2004 made.
10 posted on
11/06/2009 8:15:30 AM PST by
steve-b
(Intelligent Design -- "A Wizard Did It")
To: discostu
This must have been paid for by Symantec since the article completely avoided where Norton really loses: resources used, stability, and ability to uninstall cleanly.Not to mention Symantec's absolutely abysmal technical support and customer service.
15 posted on
11/06/2009 8:20:14 AM PST by
Fresh Wind
("Prosperity is just around the corner." VP Charles Curtis, 1932)
To: discostu; Gomez
This must have been paid for by Symantec since the article completely avoided where Norton really loses: resources used, stability, and ability to uninstall cleanly. McAfee is a resource hog - when starting worst of all, then it gets better.
19 posted on
11/06/2009 8:22:32 AM PST by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson