Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MortMan

But State constitutions cannot run afoul of the US Constitution.

It would make for an interesting case.


13 posted on 11/13/2009 8:56:09 AM PST by Yo-Yo (Joe Wilson speaks for me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Yo-Yo

State Constitutions cannot CONTRADICT the federal constitution — i.e they cannot remove rights granted by the feds. State Constitutions are permitted to add rights and responsibilities not addressed by the feds.

SnakeDoc


17 posted on 11/13/2009 9:06:28 AM PST by SnakeDoctor ("Talk low, talk slow, and don't say too much." -- John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Yo-Yo

The Vermont state constitution doesn’t run afoul of the U.S. Constitution.

The right to keep and bear arms is not abridged in the Vermont constitution.

It is the “privelege” of NOT keeping and bearing arms that is subject to additional tax.

It’s kind of elegant, IMO.


19 posted on 11/13/2009 9:14:22 AM PST by MortMan (Stubbing one's toes is a valid (if painful) way of locating furniture in the dark.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: Yo-Yo
But State constitutions cannot run afoul of the US Constitution.

But it doesn't. It supports it, but has additional conditions that are not addressed, one way or the other, in the 2nd.

34 posted on 11/13/2009 2:38:17 PM PST by AFreeBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson