Where are you getting these numbers from?
Posted on 11/14/2009 2:27:23 PM PST by SeekAndFind
The FDA's website lists the Swine Flu H1n1 vaccines ingredients which include mercury, squalene and formaldehyde. Research the ingredients for yourself.
Click here to find out what scientists have discovered about damaging effects of mercury on the brain: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KSKvDQ9OkNM
Although Dystonia is a less prevalant disorder, autism rates in America's children have skyrocketed. 1 in 150 children in America are diagnosed with autism. Mercury has been proven to cause nonsocial and uncontrollable behavior in primates. Scientific studies has proven mercury poisoning causes neurological damage...
Dystonia is a neurological movement disorder in which sustained muscle contractions cause twisting and repetitive movements or abnormal postures.
The disorder may be caused by other factors such as infection, poisoning (e.g. lead poisoning) or reaction to drugs, particularly neuroleptics. or can be hereditary.
There is a program preventing all lawsuits due to vaccine injury. Anyone who has been injured cannot sue. There has been no long term testing for the side effects of the H1N1/ Swine Flu vaccine. The h1n1/ swine flu vaccine is being given out freely in schools in America.
That would seem to be a remarkably stupid thing to do. We know absolutely nothing about possible interactions of this type.
The suspicions might turn out to be remarkaly unhealthy.
FWIW, I've never had a flu shot and don't plan on getting this one.
There is a very long list of diseases that have been essentially wiped out by vaccination, from polio to smallpox. Every one of those vaccinations had a small number of bad reactions, with everything from people paralyzed for life to dead.
But out of 1M people vaccinated, isn't 100 to 500 people with bad reactions preferable to 10,000 to 100,000 dead?
It has been credibly proposed that a contributing factor in the success of the American Revolution was that Washington innoculated the American Army with smallpox. This isn't a vaccination. Innoculation gave the person smallpox, but generally a milder case. The mortality rate was around 2% instead of at least 15% to 20%.
The British Army did not vaccinate and had several major outbreaks of virulent smallpox, especially among slaves who fled their plantations to join up for the promise of freedom.
The differential rate for vaccination is much greater.
It's alot worse than your statements suggest. That ingrained ignorance affects all aspects of their lives, as well as everyone else's.
The are totally lacking or seriously deficient in all the sciences.
They believe climate should be constant with no extremes, bluebirds and flowers year-round.They are unable to grasp that the only planet with a constant climate is a dead planet.
The functional idiots all vote.
They elect other idiots like themselves.
Over and over.
Individual human being are each unique; responding to illnesses and vaccines, allergies and cancinogens differently. There is no medication treatment or therapy that wiil affect them all the same; or even predictably.
Those people may, if hammered enough times, realize that. What they may never accept is the rational judgement that because 0.50% of the genetic deficients react badly to a vaccine, the other 99.50% of humanity should not be denied its benefits.
Remember Star Wars? It was 'only' 80% effective, so everyone loses...
The only semi-rational explanation that I can think of is the admission that the best place to spread any kind of infection is a hospital.
But that's a stretch.
A more human and humane response would be special precautions and isolation for those most vulnerable.
But real thinking is not a hallmark of our present society. Ignorance and "expediency" prevail.
Don't get me started...
That will happen forever if the exploiters are allowed to keep defining the threshold down.
Follow the money.
We are the most overmedicated culture in history. The main cause?
...television...
She took your advice. Are you happy now?
You better stay away from Vegas if you are going to use hypothetical numbers when gambling.
More than 150,000 people die every day.
It’s the end of the world as we know it....
And I feel fine.
I am a diabetic and figure the opposite. Everyone needs to get informed and use their best judgment about their health.
Smallpox.
The mortality rate is 30% to 35%.
Serious side effects to vaccination affect about 1000 out of 1M people. Life-threatening side effects <50 out of 1M. Actual deaths some lower number.
http://www.bt.cdc.gov/agent/smallpox/vaccination/reactions-vacc-public.asp
Let’s assume a 30% infection rate and nobody vaccinated. Out of 1M people that’s 300,000 that contract the disease. Of that number we can expect about 30% to die, or roughly 100,000. A large percentage of the survivors will be crippled and/or horribly scarred. Up to date medical care in an ICU would probably significantly reduce both numbers. However, in a major epidemic these available resources will be utterly swamped and can provide treatment to only a tiny fraction of those who need them, especially since the medical staff themselves are as affected as anybody else, perhaps more due to a greater likelihood of exposure.
So that’s perhaps 150,000 or more out of 1M either dead or severely affected with no vaccination.
With the 1M vaccinated there will be about 1000 severely affected.
My posts have been about vaccination in general, not about the “swine flu” vaccination in general. It is entirely possible that scientists and doctors are attempting to apply the smallpox vaccination experience to diseases where it is not appropriate.
It is also a fact that roughly 50,000 people die each year in USA from the “regular” flu. I saw a newspaper yesterday that claimed ~500 deaths from April thru October for the “swine flu.” Didn’t read the article, but the headline implied that this death rate was unprecedented.
I suspect a headline reading, “So Far Swine Flu No Big Deal” would not sell many papers. This may have played a role in the editor’s decision on how to word the headline. :)
Since vaccination works by stimulating the immune system, this doesn't necessarily make a great deal of sense to me. Someone with a severely damaged immune system would presumably find it more difficult to respond "normally" to the stimulus of the vaccine.
I would challenge you on this terminology. Someone whose genetic code reacts badly to a vaccine is not necessarily "genetically deficient," just "genetically different."
Those same genes might be an advantage in other circumstances. As carrying the gene for sickle-cell anemia apparently provides significant resistance to malaria.
I appear to have been born without the gambling gene. Spent a half hour at the slots in Vegas once. Would have had more fun playing the coke machines.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.