Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Buck W.; Grunthor
I notice how you failed to mention the fact that Grunthor made it clear he would not support John McCain if by some chance he was the nominee again.

Would a no vote for McCain be a the same as a No vote for Romney or any other GOPer in 2012? Why not point that out, why not call Grunthor on that as you have numerous others on many other threads when they say they won't support Romney.

Typical Romney/GOP hack boilerplate.

The reason we even have this conversation is because people like you as well as the RNC (perhaps you are working with them who knows) have your own “litmus” test, one the expects Conservatives to roll simply because you put up a candidate. It is the conceit that gives you and other Republicans the gall to put up people like Scozzafava in NY 23 and expect everyone to salivate like Pavlov's dog because there is an “R” after their name.

We saw how well that worked didn't we.

That path, the one the RNC has been on for over a decade is the only LOSER around here.

Here is an idea for you as well as the rest of the Republicans out there. A vote is a personal and precious commodity, the one thing we own out right that gives us a say as to what future we may have. Instead of expecting or demanding the conservative vote try EARNING IT. If you are indeed a “true conservative” and not just another in a line of RNC/Whatever RINO hacks that seem to pop up here like weeds, fight FOR conservative ideas, argue AGAINST the weak sister wannbes while we are 2 years out.

The time to surrender is not now, the time to “make do”, accept the inevitable, the time to compromise is many months from now, in the final days in October before the election. That is when conservatives will have to look deep and decide how much they are will to compromise once again.

Even then the only vote FOR Obama is an actual lever pull next to his name. The failure to win the votes of those who would otherwise vote republican is the failure of the RNC only, a failure on their part to respect and value the vote of the people whose support they should have EARNED not EXPECTED.

Of course we can avoid all of that by actually nominating a conservative. Radical idea ain't it.

Or is that scary, is that not part of the plan for you and yours?

I will assume you will meet my expectations with some wonderful quip, some “loser” comment, some charge that I am not towing the party line.

Well the last one is true, and I do that with pride...

However many of us have heard it before and will hear it again. we know from whence it comes and why so mundane and predicable comments and retorts are made. Nothing new under the sun on that.

Standing on principle has a price, fortunately there are still many of us willing to pay it...

255 posted on 11/26/2009 1:26:21 PM PST by ejonesie22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies ]


To: ejonesie22

Spoken like a true Hope & Change groupie!


256 posted on 11/26/2009 1:37:46 PM PST by Buck W. (The President of the United States IS named Schickelgruber...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies ]

To: ejonesie22; Grunthor; Jim Robinson
We wouldn't want any showboating, phony, conservatives around here that won't get on the Mitt Romney bandwagon.

Jim Robinson: "But Romney is a NO go. And I don't care who this socialist, abortionist, homosexualist, constitution trampling bastard picks for running mate. If Romney's in I'm out!
G.O.P., R.I.P!"

If Mitt Romney is in, I'm Out

262 posted on 11/26/2009 3:31:54 PM PST by ansel12 (Scozzafava/Romney 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson