Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

South Korea Builds A Better IFV
Strategy Page ^ | December 12, 2009

Posted on 12/13/2009 10:15:10 PM PST by myknowledge

The South Korean Army has received its first (of about a thousand) production model K-21 Infantry Fighting Vehicle (IFV). The 26 ton vehicle is similar to the 33 ton U.S. M-2. The K-21 has a crew of three and carries nine infantry in the back. The two man turret carries a 40mm autocannon, with 200 rounds, as well as two ATGM (Anti-Tank Guided Missile) launchers and a coaxial (with the 40mm) 7.62mm machine-gun. Top speed is 70 kilometers an hour.

The big difference between the K-21 and M-2 is weight, and that is mainly because the chassis of the K-21 is made of fiberglass. This material is as strong as metal, but much lighter. Armor protection of the two vehicles is equal. The K-21 armor can stop 14.5mm bullets and most artillery fragments (it is vulnerable to 152mm shells exploding closer than 10 meters, but at that distance, the blast effect would do serious damage).

The 40mm autocannon fires up to 300 rounds per minute, at speeds of 1,000 meters per second (3,100 fps). The anti-tank round can penetrate up to 220mm of armor. The 40mm can also fire a multipurpose shell, where the gunner can select proximity (exploding close to a target), air burst (exploding above the ground), as well as armor-piercing or fragmentation effect.

Like the M-2, the K-21 carries an extensive load of electronics, for fire control, navigation and diagnostics. The K-21 designers learned from other recent IFV designs and attempted to improve on their best characteristics. The K-21 costs less than $3 million each. This is a competitive price, and South Korea hopes to obtain export customers.


TOPICS: Military/Veterans; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: ifv; k21; rok; southkorea

K21 Infantry fighting vehicle.

1 posted on 12/13/2009 10:15:10 PM PST by myknowledge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: myknowledge
thanks, for the information / thread / post.

2 posted on 12/13/2009 11:38:44 PM PST by skinkinthegrass (Zer0 to the voter: "Welcome to 'MY' DeathCARE ® Plan"...Sucker! ...now just die. :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skinkinthegrass

I’m certainly no expert but I find it very hard to believe that fiberglass is as strong as metal.


3 posted on 12/13/2009 11:47:10 PM PST by JMS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JMS
it very hard to believe that fiberglass is as strong as metal.

true...esp. on the battlefield..."OH! Sh!t too late."
given a high temp, metal Aluminum will burn.


4 posted on 12/13/2009 11:54:22 PM PST by skinkinthegrass (Zer0 to the voter: "Welcome to 'MY' DeathCARE ® Plan"...Sucker! ...now just die. :^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: myknowledge

I’ll take 2.

Traffic really p*sses me off sometimes.


5 posted on 12/14/2009 12:36:41 AM PST by Tainan (Cogito, ergo conservatus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JMS

Depends on what type of strength you’re measuring. Still a pretty interesting idea. Except for the armor itself, nonmetal materials could be used in alot of armored vehicles for the chassis, treads, etc, to reduce weight.


6 posted on 12/14/2009 5:09:49 AM PST by SeminoleSoldier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson