Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Can Manly Men Expect of Women?
The Art of Manliness ^ | 12/20/2009 | Brett McCay

Posted on 12/22/2009 9:14:21 AM PST by SnakeDoctor

Awhile back, Leo posted these delightfully nostalgic and funny “Marital Rating Scales” from 1939 in the Community:

[See linked article]

After having a good laugh, what Kate and I both noticed after reading through these charts was that while we could imagine a modern day woman expecting her husband to live up to most of the standards on the Husband’s Chart, if a man expected a woman to adhere to the Wife’s Chart, he’d probably be met with the look of death.

Now obviously some of the expectations on both charts are just silly, and part of the reason that the Wife’s Chart seem even sillier is that a woman’s place in society has changed far more than a man’s during the last 70 years.

But it’s also indicative of a new double standard that has emerged in our modern age. Women are still free to flog men for their shortcomings and expect a lot from them, but if a man has any expectations for women, the conversation is bound to go something like this:

[See linked article]

It seems like men are catching onto to this movement to recover some of the good things of the past, while holding onto the progress we’ve made. I was just reading this interesting article in the NYT about how 20-something men are rejecting the whole casual, let it all hang out Baby Boomer vibe that’s dominated society for the last few decades and are starting to want to dress up and look sharp. This quote, from a college professor, particularly stood out to me:

“But the younger generation is looking at getting dressed up and making their mark,” Mr. Cohen continued. “It’s a real generation gap here. I teach at three different colleges, and I am amazed how dressed up some of the students are. Girls still come in their hoodies and pajamas, but boys come in their suits.”

In some ways, the new movement towards a return to traditional manliness needs women to be on board to be successful. After all, if you have men opening doors and asking women on real dates, and they’re just laughing in your face, that’s clearly not going to work out too well. And if you have men striving to be their best, but they feel like women aren’t even trying, you’ve got a recipe for creating strained relations between the sexes and bitter and disillusioned men who think all women are an unappealing mess who are not worth the trouble of dealing with (something you already see in certain online communities).

We often get emails from women who praise us up and down for the mission of the Art of Manliness. “This is just what men need!” they say. “I love the idea of bringing back traditional manliness!” they tell us. We love that women are on board with the movement, but it makes us wonder, “Okay, if men are manning up, what are women going to do to follow suit?”

After all, if women say they’re not in favor of a genderless society, and they want men to be men, then they have to be prepared for the flip side of that equation. A world where women are women.

Now don’t get me wrong. A man’s desire to man up should really have little to do with women and their opinion of him. Basing their lives around the opinions of women is exactly where men have gone wrong these last few decades. A man should want to seek true manliness out of his desire for confidence, honor, and self-respect.

But it’s also wrong-headed to think that womanliness has nothing to do with manliness. It would be hard to define manliness unless it was juxtaposed beside femininity, the way we wouldn’t be able to define dark, without the experience of light.

And it’s also indisputable that men used to be motivated to be honorable men because they felt they got something in return from the women in their lives. Manning up involves some sacrifice, but men didn’t feel like they were the only ones making an effort. Men dressed up, took women on dates and paid, brought home the bacon, took care of their wives, and acted as the rock in the family. In return, they could count on women to look classy and attractive, be charming, cook dinner, take care of the house and kids, and make her man feel like king of the castle.

But these days a new double standard has emerged where it’s okay to celebrate men manning up, but telling women they need to recover some of their femininity is offensive. To wit:

A woman telling a man to stop looking like a slob and dress up. Awesome!

A man telling a woman to stop looking like a slob and take care of herself. Sexist!

Saying that men should stop hooking up with women. Awesome!

Saying that women should stop sleeping around. Sexist!

Saying that men should get off the couch and go to work. Awesome!

Saying that a woman should be nurturing with kids. Sexist!

Saying that men should take the initiative in relationships. Awesome!

Saying that a woman should let the man lead (ever!). Sexist!

Well, you get the idea. The are a few reasons for the disparity. The first is that men spent most of world history in a position of privilege (although there were real downsides to being a man during this time, too). Then the women’s movement happened and they lost that position. So when it comes to recovering aspects of traditional manliness, men are excited to get on board (not because they want the exact same position back, but simply because they see the past fondly). Women, on the other hand, fought for the last few decades for the position that they now find themselves in. So even if they aren’t totally happy with it, looking back to recover what was good about the past makes them feel like they’re betraying what their sisters fought for. And if anyone suggests that bringing back some old school femininity might be a good idea, it’s been ingrained in them that they should be offended.

Second, women have historically been put on a pedestal, as the protectors of morality, while men have been disparaged as being baser in their nature. So it’s always been socially acceptable to castigate men but not women, because of the implicit understanding that women were just naturally pure and didn’t need much external encouragement to be “good.” Some feminists still seem to hold to this idea-that men and women are equal, but really-wink, wink- we all know that men are actually pigs. A real head scratcher to be sure.

But these days women say they don’t want to be on a pedestal, that putting them there is sexist! So now that we’re on equal footing, can we admit that today’s women need some work too?

Could we perhaps say that equality shouldn’t mean embracing and outdoing men in things that were traditionally considered masculine? That making out with other chicks for attention and lifting your shirt for beads and getting smashed and burping the alphabet and dressing in sweatsuits really has very little to do with being “liberated?”

That if men are going to know their way around a kitchen, that maybe women could, too? (I know lots of women my age who couldn’t cook to save their life.)

That you can’t insist on both being treated like a princess while also being a totally “independent woman?” (And that these dual impulses are driving men nuts?) And that a lot of relationships are falling apart not because there aren’t any good men to be found, but because women are so paranoid about “losing their identity” that they can’t settle down and give themselves over to being with a man? (Did you know that 2/3 of divorces are initiated by women?)

Now don’t get me wrong. We’re certainly not advocating a “Get back in the kitchen!” movement. Just like traditional manliness, recovering traditional womanliness will require sorting through which is the baby and which is the bathwater. And that sorting seems like an even more difficult task than it is for men. A veritable minefield where PC-ness, reality, history and progress collide.


TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: feminism; genderwars
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: ottbmare
since when is working with dignity been insufficient?

As a current dating middle-age male I have never expected a woman to have a "high-powered career"... dignified employment is certainly enough. Unless a woman of dignified employment is trying to advance their socio-economic standing by only dating men with high-powered careers...which is the standard in American culture.

21 posted on 12/22/2009 8:11:43 PM PST by Niteflyr ("Just because something is free doesn't mean it's good for you".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: chae
being a man is in someone’s actions. And there are not alot of guys out there willing to step up and be men

Female translation: Being a man = you pay for everything

:o)

22 posted on 12/22/2009 8:14:22 PM PST by Niteflyr ("Just because something is free doesn't mean it's good for you".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ottbmare
Well duh...

I'm a man...I didn't notice that!!

Ha!!

23 posted on 12/23/2009 9:00:13 AM PST by Osage Orange (Obama's a self-made man who worships his own creator...............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Osage Orange

Quarter Horses are wonderful, I love them, have owned a number of them. In some ways they are the best horses in the world. But most of them can’t keep up on a hunt unless they’re Appendix and have a big dose of Thoroughbred blood in them, so for the moment I’m doing TBs.


24 posted on 12/23/2009 9:19:50 AM PST by ottbmare (I could agree wth you, but then we'd both be wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ottbmare
I'm in Q horse country....

Where cowboy's actually ride them when they work.......

Have a very nice Christmas!!

FRegards,

25 posted on 12/23/2009 10:11:17 AM PST by Osage Orange (“Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Anyone Who Threatens It”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Osage Orange

Quarter Horses can do anything, and do it without spooking and dumping you for some stupid reason, and do it on a handful of grain a day. My fantasy is to train a registered quarter horse to do upper-level dressage, not letting on to anyone what his breeding is, and then announce it after I have blown the warmbloods right out of the water at some Grand Prix competition. Some guy is already doing this in South Carolina with an AQHA mare, but he’s not doing it secretly.

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to you, too. Off to feed and re-blanket, now.


26 posted on 12/23/2009 5:37:11 PM PST by ottbmare (I could agree wth you, but then we'd both be wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ottbmare

Sounds like you are doing great at everything you do. Better to wait for that special person who sees your true qualities than to get stuck with a superficial Joe who thinks you have a cool job/career.

Patience, grasshopper.


27 posted on 12/23/2009 5:43:11 PM PST by Canedawg (Merry Christmas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Niteflyr
which is the standard in American culture

Dang Niteflyr, you still having dating problems??? Those who don't learn from their past, are destine to repeat it. Perhaps 2010 will be a better year, but then again.... Just wanted to say hello. I haven't seen a post of yours in a while.

28 posted on 12/23/2009 5:48:47 PM PST by LuvFreeRepublic (Support our military or leave. I will help you pack BO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: LuvFreeRepublic
Dang Niteflyr, you still having dating problems??? Those who don't learn from their past, are destine to repeat it. Perhaps 2010 will be a better year, but then again.... Just wanted to say hello. I haven't seen a post of yours in a while.

Hee hee no problems here....just the needle in the haystack search...and as the song goes...."loving the one I'm with if you can't find the one you love" in the meantime. I have always been speaking "as a rule" on these topics...but there are always exceptions to every rule. Even if I personally luck out and find that elusive exception ...it doesn't and won't change the way things generally are..:o)

29 posted on 12/23/2009 7:07:10 PM PST by Niteflyr ("Just because something is free doesn't mean it's good for you".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: LuvFreeRepublic
I haven't seen a post of yours in a while.

I post almost every day....I am very passionate about other topics besides the "war" between men and women...:Oo

30 posted on 12/23/2009 7:10:36 PM PST by Niteflyr ("Just because something is free doesn't mean it's good for you".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Niteflyr

I am sure you post on other topics, just haven’t noticed. Have a Merry Christmas!


31 posted on 12/23/2009 7:44:06 PM PST by LuvFreeRepublic (Support our military or leave. I will help you pack BO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: ottbmare
Merry Christmas to you and yours....

And a happy New Year also....

I wish you were my neighbor.....

Best FRegards,

32 posted on 12/23/2009 8:12:45 PM PST by Osage Orange (“Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Anyone Who Threatens It”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson